* [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement
@ 2025-10-31 17:29 Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops Paolo Abeni
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-10-31 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
This series collects a few follow-up for the backlog refactor, with some
of them posing as fixes just to confuse the enemy (or feel the season
mood)
Targeting net-next as the issues addressed are very old, the change
is quite invasive and, as mentioned, based on the BL refactor.
Only patch 1/4 could be considered for net, but still included because
somewhat related to the others and to keep my life easy.
Paolo Abeni (4):
mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops.
mptcp: fix receive space time initialization.
mptcp: better mptcp-level rtt estimator
mptcp: add receive queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()
net/mptcp/options.c | 31 ++++++++
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 15 +++-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 -
4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops.
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-10-31 17:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: fix receive space time initialization Paolo Abeni
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-10-31 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
The rcv window is shared among all the subflows. Currently, MPTCP sync
the TCP-level rcv window with the MPTCP one at tcp_transmit_skb() time.
The above means that incoming data may sporadically observe outdated
TCP-level rcv window and being wrongly dropped by TCP.
Address the issue checking for the edge condition before queuing the data
at TCP level, and eventually syncing the rcv window as needed.
Note that the issue is actually present from the very first MPTCP
implementation, but backports older than the blamed commit below will range
from impossible to useless.
Before:
nstat >/dev/null ;sleep 1; nstat -z TcpExtBeyondWindow
TcpExtBeyondWindow 14 0.0
After:
nstat >/dev/null ;sleep 1; nstat -z TcpExtBeyondWindow
TcpExtBeyondWindow 0 0.0
Fixes: fa3fe2b15031 ("mptcp: track window announced to peer")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/options.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index cf531f2d815c..9e2516193e21 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -1042,6 +1042,31 @@ static void __mptcp_snd_una_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u64 new_snd_una)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_una, new_snd_una);
}
+static void rwin_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
+ u64 mptcp_rcv_wnd;
+
+ /* Avoid touching extra cachelines if TCP is going to accept this
+ * skb without filling the TCP-level window even with a possibly
+ * outdated mptcp-level rwin.
+ */
+ if (!skb->len || skb->len < tcp_receive_window(tp))
+ return;
+
+ mptcp_rcv_wnd = atomic64_read(&msk->rcv_wnd_sent);
+ if (!after64(mptcp_rcv_wnd, subflow->rcv_wnd_sent))
+ return;
+
+ /* Some other subflow grew the mptcp-level rwin since rcv_wup,
+ * resync.
+ */
+ tp->rcv_wnd += mptcp_rcv_wnd - subflow->rcv_wnd_sent;
+ subflow->rcv_wnd_sent = mptcp_rcv_wnd;
+}
+
static void ack_update_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
struct sock *ssk,
struct mptcp_options_received *mp_opt)
@@ -1209,6 +1234,7 @@ bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
if (mp_opt.use_ack)
ack_update_msk(msk, sk, &mp_opt);
+ rwin_update(msk, sk, skb);
/* Zero-data-length packets are dropped by the caller and not
* propagated to the MPTCP layer, so the skb extension does not
@@ -1295,6 +1321,10 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th)
if (rcv_wnd_new != rcv_wnd_old) {
raise_win:
+ /* the msk-level rcv wnd is after the tcp level one,
+ * sync the latter
+ */
+ rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old;
win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq;
tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX);
new_win = tp->rcv_wnd;
@@ -1318,6 +1348,7 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th)
update_wspace:
WRITE_ONCE(msk->old_wspace, tp->rcv_wnd);
+ subflow->rcv_wnd_sent = rcv_wnd_new;
}
__sum16 __mptcp_make_csum(u64 data_seq, u32 subflow_seq, u16 data_len, __wsum sum)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 8e0f780e9210..84f2c51d776c 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
u64 remote_key;
u64 idsn;
u64 map_seq;
+ u64 rcv_wnd_sent;
u32 snd_isn;
u32 token;
u32 rel_write_seq;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: fix receive space time initialization.
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-10-31 17:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/4] mptcp: better mptcp-level rtt estimator Paolo Abeni
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-10-31 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
MPTCP initialize the receive buffer stamp in mptcp_rcv_space_init(),
using the provided subflow stamp. Such helper is invoked in several
places, with a catch-up call in mptcp_rcv_space_adjust().
For passive sockets, MPTCP ends-up accesses the subflow stamp before
its initialization, leading to quite randomic timing for the first
receive buffer auto-tune event.
Fix the issue using a fresh stamp.
Drop the all the mptcp_rcv_space_init() invocations except the catch-up
one: they add unneeded complexity for no good reason.
As a side effect, this avoid using a zero value for imsk->rcvq_space.time,
that made the first receive buffer auto-tune even quite randomic.
This will also make the next patch cleaner.
Fixes: 013e3179dbd2 ("mptcp: fix rcv space initialization")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 6 +++++-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index d16ad1a85411..e17abab7bab6 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2047,6 +2047,21 @@ static int __mptcp_recvmsg_mskq(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
return copied;
}
+static void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
+{
+ const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
+
+ msk->rcvspace_init = 1;
+ msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
+ msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us = 0;
+
+ /* initial rcv_space offering made to peer */
+ msk->rcvq_space.space = min_t(u32, tp->rcv_wnd,
+ TCP_INIT_CWND * tp->advmss);
+ if (msk->rcvq_space.space == 0)
+ msk->rcvq_space.space = TCP_INIT_CWND * TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
+}
+
/* receive buffer autotuning. See tcp_rcv_space_adjust for more information.
*
* Only difference: Use highest rtt estimate of the subflows in use.
@@ -2069,8 +2084,8 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
msk->rcvq_space.copied += copied;
- mstamp = div_u64(tcp_clock_ns(), NSEC_PER_USEC);
- time = tcp_stamp_us_delta(mstamp, msk->rcvq_space.time);
+ mstamp = mptcp_stamp();
+ time = tcp_stamp_us_delta(mstamp, READ_ONCE(msk->rcvq_space.time));
rtt_us = msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us;
if (rtt_us && time < (rtt_us >> 3))
@@ -3487,7 +3502,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone_init(const struct sock *sk,
mptcp_copy_inaddrs(nsk, ssk);
__mptcp_propagate_sndbuf(nsk, ssk);
- mptcp_rcv_space_init(msk, ssk);
+ msk->rcvq_space.time = mptcp_stamp();
if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_ACK)
__mptcp_subflow_fully_established(msk, subflow, mp_opt);
@@ -3497,23 +3512,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone_init(const struct sock *sk,
return nsk;
}
-void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
-{
- const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
-
- msk->rcvspace_init = 1;
- msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
- msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us = 0;
-
- msk->rcvq_space.time = tp->tcp_mstamp;
-
- /* initial rcv_space offering made to peer */
- msk->rcvq_space.space = min_t(u32, tp->rcv_wnd,
- TCP_INIT_CWND * tp->advmss);
- if (msk->rcvq_space.space == 0)
- msk->rcvq_space.space = TCP_INIT_CWND * TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
-}
-
static void mptcp_destroy(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
@@ -3703,6 +3701,8 @@ void mptcp_finish_connect(struct sock *ssk)
*/
WRITE_ONCE(msk->local_key, subflow->local_key);
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->rcvq_space.time, mptcp_stamp());
+
mptcp_pm_new_connection(msk, ssk, 0);
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 84f2c51d776c..1f67d8468dfb 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -908,7 +908,11 @@ static inline bool mptcp_is_fully_established(struct sock *sk)
READ_ONCE(mptcp_sk(sk)->fully_established);
}
-void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk);
+static inline u64 mptcp_stamp(void)
+{
+ return div_u64(tcp_clock_ns(), NSEC_PER_USEC);
+}
+
void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk);
bool mptcp_finish_join(struct sock *sk);
bool mptcp_schedule_work(struct sock *sk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index ac8616e7521e..b64ab7649908 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -462,8 +462,6 @@ void __mptcp_sync_state(struct sock *sk, int state)
subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
__mptcp_propagate_sndbuf(sk, ssk);
- if (!msk->rcvspace_init)
- mptcp_rcv_space_init(msk, ssk);
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT) {
/* subflow->idsn is always available is TCP_SYN_SENT state,
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 3/4] mptcp: better mptcp-level rtt estimator
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: fix receive space time initialization Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-10-31 17:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 4/4] mptcp: add receive queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() Paolo Abeni
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-10-31 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
On high speed links, the MPTCP-level receive buffer auto-tuning
happens with a frequency well above the TCP-level's one. That in
turn can cause excessive/unneeded receive buffer increase.
On such links, the initial rtt_us value is considerably higher
than the actual delay, but the current mptcp_rcv_space_adjust() logic
prevents msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us from decreasing.
Address the issue with a more accurate RTT estimation strategy: the
MPTCP-level RTT is set to the minimum of all the subflow feeding data into
the MPTCP-receive buffer.
Some complexity is due to try to avoid frequent updates of MPTCP-level
fields and to allow subflow feeding data via the backlog to still perform
the update under the msk socket lock.
Fixes: a6b118febbab ("mptcp: add receive buffer auto-tuning")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index e17abab7bab6..4fc1519baab6 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -865,10 +865,52 @@ static bool move_skbs_to_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
return moved;
}
+static void mptcp_rcv_rtt_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u32 rtt_us, u8 sr)
+{
+ /* Similar to plain TCP, only consider samples with empty RX queue */
+ if (mptcp_data_avail(msk))
+ return;
+
+ if (msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset) {
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us = rtt_us;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset = false;
+ msk->scaling_ratio = sr;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (rtt_us < msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us)
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us = rtt_us;
+ if (sr < msk->scaling_ratio)
+ msk->scaling_ratio = sr;
+}
+
+static void mptcp_rcv_rtt_update_from_backlog(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ mptcp_rcv_rtt_update(msk, msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us,
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio);
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset_bl)) {
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us = U32_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset_bl = false;
+ }
+}
+
+static void mptcp_backlog_rcv_rtt_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u32 rtt_us,
+ u8 sr)
+{
+ if (rtt_us < msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us)
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us = rtt_us;
+ if (sr < msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio)
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio = sr;
+}
+
void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ u32 rtt_us = tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us;
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ u8 sr = tcp_sk(ssk)->scaling_ratio;
/* The peer can send data while we are shutting down this
* subflow at subflow destruction time, but we must avoid enqueuing
@@ -879,10 +921,12 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
+ mptcp_rcv_rtt_update(msk, rtt_us, sr);
/* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
if (move_skbs_to_msk(msk, ssk) && mptcp_epollin_ready(sk))
sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
} else {
+ mptcp_backlog_rcv_rtt_update(msk, rtt_us, sr);
__mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, false);
}
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
@@ -2053,7 +2097,6 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
msk->rcvspace_init = 1;
msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
- msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us = 0;
/* initial rcv_space offering made to peer */
msk->rcvq_space.space = min_t(u32, tp->rcv_wnd,
@@ -2070,16 +2113,15 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
- u8 scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
- u32 time, advmss = 1;
- u64 rtt_us, mstamp;
+ u32 rtt_us, time;
+ u64 mstamp;
msk_owned_by_me(msk);
if (copied <= 0)
return;
- if (!msk->rcvspace_init)
+ if (unlikely(!msk->rcvspace_init))
mptcp_rcv_space_init(msk, msk->first);
msk->rcvq_space.copied += copied;
@@ -2087,29 +2129,8 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
mstamp = mptcp_stamp();
time = tcp_stamp_us_delta(mstamp, READ_ONCE(msk->rcvq_space.time));
- rtt_us = msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us;
- if (rtt_us && time < (rtt_us >> 3))
- return;
-
- rtt_us = 0;
- mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
- const struct tcp_sock *tp;
- u64 sf_rtt_us;
- u32 sf_advmss;
-
- tp = tcp_sk(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow));
-
- sf_rtt_us = READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us);
- sf_advmss = READ_ONCE(tp->advmss);
-
- rtt_us = max(sf_rtt_us, rtt_us);
- advmss = max(sf_advmss, advmss);
- scaling_ratio = min(tp->scaling_ratio, scaling_ratio);
- }
-
- msk->rcvq_space.rtt_us = rtt_us;
- msk->scaling_ratio = scaling_ratio;
- if (time < (rtt_us >> 3) || rtt_us == 0)
+ rtt_us = msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us;
+ if (rtt_us == U32_MAX || time < (rtt_us >> 3))
return;
if (msk->rcvq_space.copied <= msk->rcvq_space.space)
@@ -2137,6 +2158,8 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
new_measure:
msk->rcvq_space.copied = 0;
msk->rcvq_space.time = mstamp;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset = true;
+ WRITE_ONCE(msk->rcv_rtt_est.reset_bl, true);
}
static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *skbs, u32 *delta)
@@ -2198,6 +2221,7 @@ static bool mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
u32 moved;
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
+ mptcp_rcv_rtt_update_from_backlog(mptcp_sk(sk));
while (mptcp_can_spool_backlog(sk, &skbs)) {
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
enqueued |= __mptcp_move_skbs(sk, &skbs, &moved);
@@ -2933,6 +2957,10 @@ static void __mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
msk->timer_ival = TCP_RTO_MIN;
msk->scaling_ratio = TCP_DEFAULT_SCALING_RATIO;
msk->backlog_len = 0;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us = U32_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us = U32_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
+ msk->scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->first, NULL);
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_sync_mss = mptcp_sync_mss;
@@ -3375,6 +3403,10 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
msk->bytes_sent = 0;
msk->bytes_retrans = 0;
msk->rcvspace_init = 0;
+ msk->scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.rtt_us = U32_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_rtt_us = U32_MAX;
+ msk->rcv_rtt_est.bl_scaling_ratio = U8_MAX;
/* for fallback's sake */
WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_seq, 0);
@@ -3560,6 +3592,7 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&join_list);
list_splice_init(&msk->join_list, &join_list);
+ mptcp_rcv_rtt_update_from_backlog(msk);
/* the following actions acquire the subflow socket lock
*
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 1f67d8468dfb..d38a455f8f5b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -340,11 +340,17 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
*/
struct mptcp_pm_data pm;
struct mptcp_sched_ops *sched;
+ struct {
+ u32 rtt_us; /* Minimum rtt of subflows */
+ u32 bl_rtt_us; /* Min rtt if subflows using the bl */
+ u8 bl_scaling_ratio;
+ bool reset;
+ bool reset_bl; /* Protected by data lock */
+ } rcv_rtt_est;
struct {
int space; /* bytes copied in last measurement window */
int copied; /* bytes copied in this measurement window */
u64 time; /* start time of measurement window */
- u64 rtt_us; /* last maximum rtt of subflows */
} rcvq_space;
u8 scaling_ratio;
bool allow_subflows;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next 4/4] mptcp: add receive queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/4] mptcp: better mptcp-level rtt estimator Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-10-31 17:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-11-01 9:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-01 11:20 ` MPTCP CI
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2025-10-31 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
This is the mptcp counter-part of commit ea33537d8292 ("tcp: add receive
queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()").
Prior to this commit:
ESTAB 33165568 0 192.168.255.2:5201 192.168.255.1:53380 \
skmem:(r33076416,rb33554432,t0,tb91136,f448,w0,o0,bl0,d0)
After:
ESTAB 3279168 0 192.168.255.2:5201 192.168.255.1]:53042 \
skmem:(r3190912,rb3719956,t0,tb91136,f1536,w0,o0,bl0,d0)
(same tput)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 4fc1519baab6..37a90d644e7b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2105,6 +2105,27 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
msk->rcvq_space.space = TCP_INIT_CWND * TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
}
+static unsigned int mptcp_inq_hint(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ const struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ const struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+ if (skb) {
+ u64 hint_val = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq) - MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
+
+ if (hint_val >= INT_MAX)
+ return INT_MAX;
+
+ return (unsigned int)hint_val;
+ }
+
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE || (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* receive buffer autotuning. See tcp_rcv_space_adjust for more information.
*
* Only difference: Use highest rtt estimate of the subflows in use.
@@ -2133,10 +2154,12 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
if (rtt_us == U32_MAX || time < (rtt_us >> 3))
return;
- if (msk->rcvq_space.copied <= msk->rcvq_space.space)
+ copied = msk->rcvq_space.copied;
+ copied -= mptcp_inq_hint(sk);
+ if (copied <= msk->rcvq_space.space)
goto new_measure;
- if (mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk, msk->rcvq_space.copied)) {
+ if (mptcp_rcvbuf_grow(sk, copied)) {
/* Make subflows follow along. If we do not do this, we
* get drops at subflow level if skbs can't be moved to
@@ -2150,7 +2173,7 @@ static void mptcp_rcv_space_adjust(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int copied)
ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
if (tcp_sk(ssk)->rcvq_space.space)
- tcp_rcvbuf_grow(ssk, msk->rcvq_space.copied);
+ tcp_rcvbuf_grow(ssk, copied);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
}
}
@@ -2233,27 +2256,6 @@ static bool mptcp_move_skbs(struct sock *sk)
return enqueued;
}
-static unsigned int mptcp_inq_hint(const struct sock *sk)
-{
- const struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
- const struct sk_buff *skb;
-
- skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
- if (skb) {
- u64 hint_val = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq) - MPTCP_SKB_CB(skb)->map_seq;
-
- if (hint_val >= INT_MAX)
- return INT_MAX;
-
- return (unsigned int)hint_val;
- }
-
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE || (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN))
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
int flags, int *addr_len)
{
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 4/4] mptcp: add receive queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() Paolo Abeni
@ 2025-11-01 9:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-01 11:20 ` MPTCP CI
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2025-11-01 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Paolo,
On 31/10/2025 18:29, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> This series collects a few follow-up for the backlog refactor, with some
> of them posing as fixes just to confuse the enemy (or feel the season
> mood)
:)
> Targeting net-next as the issues addressed are very old, the change
> is quite invasive and, as mentioned, based on the BL refactor.
>
> Only patch 1/4 could be considered for net, but still included because
> somewhat related to the others and to keep my life easy.
It makes sense!
Thank you for the fixes and improvements!
Note: this is not a review. Just to let you know I manually applied this
series on top of the "mptcp: introduce backlog processing" series to
avoid conflicts. I guess that was the intension. If you want this to be
automated to get results quicker, you can add a line like this one in
the cover-letter:
Based-on: <cover.1761576117.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
While at it, I also rebased the above series on top of the export
branch, and I had a small conflict with Eric's latest series: "tcp: fix
receive autotune again". That's because I removed an extra line in the
v3 that got applied.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-11-01 9:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Matthieu Baerts
@ 2025-11-01 11:20 ` MPTCP CI
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2025-11-01 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_connect_sendfile - Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) - Critical: Global Timeout ❌
- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) - Critical: Global Timeout ❌
- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/18994741164
Initiator: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/7e6786f6a20f
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1018332
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-01 11:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-31 17:29 [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 1/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded subflow-level drops Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: fix receive space time initialization Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 3/4] mptcp: better mptcp-level rtt estimator Paolo Abeni
2025-10-31 17:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 4/4] mptcp: add receive queue awareness in tcp_rcv_space_adjust() Paolo Abeni
2025-11-01 9:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: autotune related improvement Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-01 11:20 ` MPTCP CI
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.