From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 18:53:50 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1779412152.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[CHANGELOG]
RFC->v1:
- Remove unused btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members
To make space for the new member.
- Fix a duplicated bg->flags assignment in fill_dummy_bgs()
Just exposed by the last patch which also touches that code.
- Use a dedicated member to record the on-disk chunk type
So it's less fragile than the RFC patch.
The single-data-RAID56 (2 disks raid5 or 3 disks raid6) is not a feature
that should be supported in the first place, thus raid56 is going to
remove such support.
Meanwhile rejecting single-data-RAID56 will cause existing btrfs users
unable to mount their fs, even if there is only a single
empty chunk with that flag, mostly caused by some degraded mount.
So to avoid impacting existing users, implement an internal
single-data-RAID56 to RAID1/RAID1C3 mapping, to co-operate with the
upstream raid56 lib changes.
Qu Wenruo (3):
btrfs: remove btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members
btrfs: remove duplicated block group type assignment
btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 3 +--
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 10 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 9:23 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: remove btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members Qu Wenruo
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: remove duplicated block group type assignment Qu Wenruo
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3 Qu Wenruo
2026-05-23 14:23 ` David Sterba
2026-05-23 22:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-24 4:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-25 10:12 ` David Sterba
2026-05-25 10:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-25 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-25 10:17 ` David Sterba
2026-05-25 10:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-26 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-26 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1779412152.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.