All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support
@ 2026-06-12 14:01 Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrea della Porta @ 2026-06-12 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrea della Porta,
	devicetree, linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
	Naushir Patuck, Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger

This patchset adds support for the PWM controller found on the
Raspberry Pi RP1 southbridge. This is necessary to operate the
cooling fan connected to one of the PWM channels.

The tachometer pin for the fan speed is managed by the firmware 
running on the RP1's M-core. It uses the PHASE2 register
to report the RPM, which is then exported by this driver via
syscon registers. A subsequent patch will add a new device
and driver to read the RPM and export this value via hwmon.
 
Subsequent patches will also add the CPU thermal zone, which
acts as a consumer of the PWM device.

Best regards,
Andrea

CHANGES in V5:

- period_tick is now capped to U32_MAX to avoid breaking
  monotonicity
- period_ticks less than 2 are set to 2
- fixed two casts in fromhw() that could led to an incorrect
  truncation/underflow
- when disabling a pwm channel, first set the polarity to
  avoid unintended quiescent level
- in probe function, fixed and error path that could leak
  an invalid pwm_chip struct


Naushir Patuck (2):
  dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
  pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver

Stanimir Varbanov (1):
  arm64: dts: broadcom: rpi-5: Add RP1 PWM node

 .../bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml     |  54 +++
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts     |  12 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi  |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c                         | 424 ++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 509 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c

-- 
2.35.3



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
  2026-06-12 14:01 [PATCH v5 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support Andrea della Porta
@ 2026-06-12 14:01 ` Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
  2026-06-12 15:24   ` Stanimir Varbanov
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: dts: broadcom: rpi-5: Add RP1 PWM node Andrea della Porta
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrea della Porta @ 2026-06-12 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrea della Porta,
	devicetree, linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
	Naushir Patuck, Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger
  Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski

From: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>

Add the devicetree binding documentation for the PWM
controller found in the Raspberry Pi RP1 chipset.

Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Co-developed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 .../bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml     | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6f8461d0454f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
+
+description: |
+  The PWM peripheral is a flexible waveform generator with a
+  variety of operational modes. It has the following features:
+   - four independent output channels
+   - 32-bit counter widths
+   - Seven output generation modes
+   - Optional per-channel output inversion
+   - Optional duty-cycle data FIFO with DMA support
+   - Optional sigma-delta noise shaping engine
+  Serves as a fan speed provider to other nodes for a PWM-connected
+  fan using shared registers (syscon).
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: raspberrypi,rp1-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 3
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    pwm@98000 {
+      compatible = "raspberrypi,rp1-pwm";
+      reg = <0x98000 0x100>;
+      clocks = <&rp1_clocks 17>;
+      #pwm-cells = <3>;
+    };
-- 
2.35.3



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver
  2026-06-12 14:01 [PATCH v5 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
@ 2026-06-12 14:01 ` Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
  2026-06-12 14:29   ` Sean Young
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: dts: broadcom: rpi-5: Add RP1 PWM node Andrea della Porta
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrea della Porta @ 2026-06-12 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrea della Porta,
	devicetree, linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
	Naushir Patuck, Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger

From: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>

The Raspberry Pi RP1 southbridge features an embedded PWM
controller with 4 output channels, alongside an RPM interface
to read the fan speed on the Raspberry Pi 5.

Add the supporting driver.

Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Co-developed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig   |   9 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile  |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c | 424 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 434 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 6f3147518376a..c3ddc0eb4774f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -625,6 +625,15 @@ config PWM_ROCKCHIP
 	  Generic PWM framework driver for the PWM controller found on
 	  Rockchip SoCs.
 
+config PWM_RASPBERRYPI_RP1
+	tristate "RP1 PWM support"
+	depends on MISC_RP1 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on HAS_IOMEM
+	select REGMAP_MMIO
+	select MFD_SYSCON
+	help
+	  PWM framework driver for Raspberry Pi RP1 controller.
+
 config PWM_SAMSUNG
 	tristate "Samsung PWM support"
 	depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 0dc0d2b69025d..59f29f60f9123 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_RZG2L_GPT)	+= pwm-rzg2l-gpt.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_RZ_MTU3)	+= pwm-rz-mtu3.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU)	+= pwm-renesas-tpu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP)	+= pwm-rockchip.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RASPBERRYPI_RP1)	+= pwm-rp1.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG)	+= pwm-samsung.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE)	+= pwm-sifive.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SL28CPLD)	+= pwm-sl28cpld.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6382a81a5ea0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,424 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * pwm-rp1.c
+ *
+ * Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM.
+ *
+ * Copyright © 2026 Raspberry Pi Ltd.
+ *
+ * Author: Naushir Patuck (naush@raspberrypi.com)
+ *
+ * Based on the pwm-bcm2835 driver by:
+ * Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be>
+ *
+ * Datasheet: https://pip-assets.raspberrypi.com/categories/892-raspberry-pi-5/documents/RP-008370-DS-1-rp1-peripherals.pdf?disposition=inline
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - Channels can be enabled/disabled through a global update flag, while the
+ *   period and duty per-channel registers are independently updatable, and
+ *   they are latched on the end of (specific channel) period strobe.
+ *   This means that period and duty changes might result in glitches if the
+ *   period/duty is changed exactly during an end of period strobe.
+ * - Since the duty/period registers are freely updatable (do not depend on
+ *   the global update flag), setting one of them close to the period end and
+ *   the other right afterwards results in a mixed output for that cycle because
+ *   the write ops are not atomic.
+ * - The global update flag prevents mis-sampling of multi-bit bus signals in
+ *   the PWM clock domain. This ensures that all PWM channel settings update
+ *   on the same PWM clock cycle. Channels start in sync only if they share the
+ *   same period.
+ * - If both duty and period are set to 0, the output is a constant low signal
+ *   if polarity is normal or a constant high signal if polarity is inversed.
+ * - When disabled the output is driven to 0 if polarity is normal, or to 1
+ *   if polarity is inversed.
+ * - Disabling the PWM stops the output immediately, without waiting for current
+ *   period to complete first.
+ * - Channels are phase-capable, but on RPi5, the firmware can use a channel
+ *   phase register to report the RPM of the fan connected to that PWM
+ *   channel. As a result, phase control will be ignored for now.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
+
+#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL			0x000
+#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(chan)	BIT(chan)
+#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_SET_UPDATE		BIT(31)
+
+#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(chan)			(0x014 + ((chan) * 0x10))
+#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY		BIT(3)
+#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_FIFO_POP_MASK		BIT(8)
+#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE			GENMASK(2, 0)
+enum rp1_pwm_ctrl_mode {
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_ZERO,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_TE_MS,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PC_MS,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PD_ENC,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_MSB_SER,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PPM,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_LE_MS,
+	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_LSB_SER,
+};
+
+#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_DEFAULT		(RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_FIFO_POP_MASK +  \
+						FIELD_PREP(RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE, \
+						RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_TE_MS))
+
+#define RP1_PWM_RANGE(chan)			(0x018 + ((chan) * 0x10))
+#define RP1_PWM_PHASE(chan)			(0x01C + ((chan) * 0x10))
+#define RP1_PWM_DUTY(chan)			(0x020 + ((chan) * 0x10))
+
+#define RP1_PWM_NUM_PWMS			4
+
+struct rp1_pwm {
+	struct regmap *regmap;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
+	bool clk_enabled;
+};
+
+struct rp1_pwm_waveform {
+	u32 period_ticks;
+	u32 duty_ticks;
+	bool enabled;
+	bool inverted_polarity;
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config rp1_pwm_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits = 32,
+	.val_bits = 32,
+	.reg_stride = 4,
+	.max_register = 0x60,
+};
+
+static void rp1_pwm_apply_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	u32 value;
+
+	/* update the changed registers on the next strobe to avoid glitches */
+	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &value);
+	value |= RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_SET_UPDATE;
+	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, value);
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	/* init channel to reset defaults, preserving the polarity bit */
+	regmap_update_bits(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm),
+			   ~(u32)RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_DEFAULT);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_tohw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+				       struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				       const struct pwm_waveform *wf,
+				       void *_wfhw)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	u64 period_ticks, duty_ticks, offset_ticks;
+	struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
+	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!wf->period_length_ns) {
+		wfhw->enabled = false;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	period_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->period_length_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+
+	/*
+	 * The period is limited to U32_MAX, and it will be decremented by one later
+	 * to allow 100% duty cycle.
+	 */
+	if (period_ticks > U32_MAX) {
+		period_ticks = U32_MAX;
+	} else if (period_ticks < 2) {
+		period_ticks = 2;
+		ret = 1;
+	}
+
+	duty_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_length_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+	duty_ticks = min(duty_ticks, period_ticks);
+	offset_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_offset_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+	if (offset_ticks >= period_ticks)
+		offset_ticks %= period_ticks;
+	if (duty_ticks && offset_ticks &&
+	    duty_ticks + offset_ticks >= period_ticks) {
+		wfhw->duty_ticks = period_ticks - duty_ticks;
+		wfhw->inverted_polarity = true;
+	} else {
+		wfhw->duty_ticks = duty_ticks;
+		wfhw->inverted_polarity = false;
+	}
+	/* Account for the extra tick at the end of the period */
+	wfhw->period_ticks = period_ticks - 1;
+
+	wfhw->enabled = true;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_fromhw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+					 struct pwm_device *pwm,
+					 const void *_wfhw,
+					 struct pwm_waveform *wf)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
+	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
+	u64 ticks;
+
+	*wf = (struct pwm_waveform){ };
+
+	if (!wfhw->enabled)
+		return 0;
+
+	wf->period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(((u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1) * NSEC_PER_SEC,
+						clk_rate);
+
+	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity) {
+		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)wfhw->duty_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC,
+						      clk_rate);
+	} else {
+		ticks = (u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1 - wfhw->duty_ticks;
+		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
+		wf->duty_offset_ns = wf->period_length_ns - wf->duty_length_ns;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_write_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+				  struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				  const void *_wfhw)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
+	u32 value, ctrl;
+
+	/* set polarity */
+	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), &value);
+	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity)
+		value &= ~RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
+	else
+		value |= RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
+	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), value);
+
+	/* early exit if disabled */
+	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &ctrl);
+	if (!wfhw->enabled) {
+		ctrl &= ~RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm);
+		goto exit_disable;
+	}
+
+	/* set period and duty cycle */
+	regmap_write(rp1->regmap,
+		     RP1_PWM_RANGE(pwm->hwpwm), wfhw->period_ticks);
+	regmap_write(rp1->regmap,
+		     RP1_PWM_DUTY(pwm->hwpwm), wfhw->duty_ticks);
+
+	/* enable the channel */
+	ctrl |= RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm);
+exit_disable:
+	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, ctrl);
+
+	rp1_pwm_apply_config(chip, pwm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_read_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+				 struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				 void *_wfhw)
+{
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
+	u32 value;
+
+	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &value);
+	wfhw->enabled = !!(value & RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), &value);
+	wfhw->inverted_polarity = !!(value & RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY);
+
+	if (wfhw->enabled) {
+		regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_RANGE(pwm->hwpwm), &wfhw->period_ticks);
+		regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_DUTY(pwm->hwpwm), &wfhw->duty_ticks);
+	} else {
+		wfhw->period_ticks = 0;
+		wfhw->duty_ticks = 0;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops rp1_pwm_ops = {
+	.sizeof_wfhw = sizeof(struct rp1_pwm_waveform),
+	.request = rp1_pwm_request,
+	.round_waveform_tohw = rp1_pwm_round_waveform_tohw,
+	.round_waveform_fromhw = rp1_pwm_round_waveform_fromhw,
+	.read_waveform = rp1_pwm_read_waveform,
+	.write_waveform = rp1_pwm_write_waveform,
+};
+
+static int rp1_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
+	struct pwm_chip *chip;
+	void __iomem	*base;
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1;
+	int ret;
+
+	chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(dev, RP1_PWM_NUM_PWMS, sizeof(*rp1));
+	if (IS_ERR(chip))
+		return PTR_ERR(chip);
+
+	rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(base))
+		return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+	rp1->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &rp1_pwm_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(rp1->regmap))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rp1->regmap), "Cannot initialize regmap\n");
+
+	rp1->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(rp1->clk))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rp1->clk), "Clock not found\n");
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to enable clock\n");
+	rp1->clk_enabled = true;
+
+	ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, rp1->clk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get exclusive rate\n");
+		goto err_disable_clk;
+	}
+
+	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(rp1->clk);
+	if (!clk_rate) {
+		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to get clock rate\n");
+		goto err_disable_clk;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * To prevent u64 overflow in period calculations:
+	 * mul_u64_u64_div_u64(period_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC)
+	 * If clk_rate > 1 GHz, the result can overflow.
+	 */
+	if (clk_rate > HZ_PER_GHZ) {
+		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Clock rate > 1 GHz is not supported\n");
+		goto err_disable_clk;
+	}
+	rp1->clk_rate = clk_rate;
+
+	chip->ops = &rp1_pwm_ops;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
+
+	ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
+		goto err_disable_clk;
+	}
+
+	ret = of_syscon_register_regmap(np, rp1->regmap);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register syscon\n");
+		goto err_remove_chip;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_remove_chip:
+	pwmchip_remove(chip);
+err_disable_clk:
+	clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void rp1_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	pwmchip_remove(chip);
+
+	if (rp1->clk_enabled) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
+		rp1->clk_enabled = false;
+	}
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	if (rp1->clk_enabled) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
+		rp1->clk_enabled = false;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rp1_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clock on resume: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rp1->clk_enabled = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rp1_pwm_pm_ops, rp1_pwm_suspend, rp1_pwm_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id rp1_pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "raspberrypi,rp1-pwm" },
+	{ /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rp1_pwm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver rp1_pwm_driver = {
+	.probe = rp1_pwm_probe,
+	.remove = rp1_pwm_remove,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "rp1-pwm",
+		.of_match_table = rp1_pwm_of_match,
+		.pm = pm_ptr(&rp1_pwm_pm_ops),
+		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
+	},
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(rp1_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RP1 PWM driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.35.3



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: dts: broadcom: rpi-5: Add RP1 PWM node
  2026-06-12 14:01 [PATCH v5 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
@ 2026-06-12 14:01 ` Andrea della Porta
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrea della Porta @ 2026-06-12 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrea della Porta,
	devicetree, linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
	Naushir Patuck, Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger

From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>

The RP1 chipset used on the Raspberry Pi 5 features an integrated
PWM controller to drive the cooling fan.

Add the corresponding DT node for this PWM controller.

Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Co-developed-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi     |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts
index 0fc57e72632ed..748be8f1ee9e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
 };
 
 &rp1_gpio {
+	fan_pwm_default_state: fan-pwm-default-state {
+		function = "pwm1";
+		pins = "gpio45";
+		bias-pull-down;
+	};
+
 	usb_vbus_default_state: usb-vbus-default-state {
 		function = "vbus1";
 		groups = "vbus1";
@@ -94,6 +100,12 @@ &rp1_i2c6 {
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 };
 
+&rp1_pwm1 {
+	pinctrl-0 = <&fan_pwm_default_state>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
 &rp1_usb0 {
 	pinctrl-0 = <&usb_vbus_default_state>;
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi
index 16f5359395835..df4c2d09c8d34 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/rp1-common.dtsi
@@ -99,7 +99,16 @@ rp1_i2c6: i2c@40088000 {
 		clocks = <&rp1_clocks RP1_CLK_SYS>;
 		i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <65>;
 		i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <100>;
+		status = "disabled";
+	};
 
+	rp1_pwm1: pwm@4009c000 {
+		compatible = "raspberrypi,rp1-pwm";
+		reg = <0x00 0x4009c000  0x0 0x100>;
+		clocks = <&rp1_clocks RP1_CLK_PWM1>;
+		assigned-clocks = <&rp1_clocks RP1_CLK_PWM1>;
+		assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
+		#pwm-cells = <3>;
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-- 
2.35.3



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
@ 2026-06-12 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
  2026-06-12 15:24   ` Stanimir Varbanov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-12 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea della Porta; +Cc: conor+dt, devicetree, robh

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The binding advertises optional DMA support but omits the required `dmas` and `dma-names` properties, causing schema validation to fail for fully-described hardware.
--

commit e8a66b347923785d0769453c48739036bf8237d0
Author: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>

dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller

This commit adds the devicetree binding documentation for the PWM controller
found in the Raspberry Pi RP1 chipset.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6f8461d0454f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml

[ ... ]

> +description: |
> +  The PWM peripheral is a flexible waveform generator with a
> +  variety of operational modes. It has the following features:
> +   - four independent output channels
> +   - 32-bit counter widths
> +   - Seven output generation modes
> +   - Optional per-channel output inversion
> +   - Optional duty-cycle data FIFO with DMA support
> +   - Optional sigma-delta noise shaping engine
> +  Serves as a fan speed provider to other nodes for a PWM-connected
> +  fan using shared registers (syscon).
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: raspberrypi,rp1-pwm
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#pwm-cells":
> +    const: 3
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false

[Severity: Low]
Since the description advertises optional DMA support, should the properties
block also define dmas and dma-names?

With unevaluatedProperties set to false, any device tree node that tries to
describe the hardware's DMA channels will fail schema validation. Even if the
OS driver does not yet implement DMA support, shouldn't the binding fully
describe the hardware capabilities so fully-described nodes aren't rejected?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1780670224.git.andrea.porta@suse.com?part=1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
@ 2026-06-12 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
  2026-06-12 14:29   ` Sean Young
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-12 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea della Porta; +Cc: devicetree, conor+dt, robh

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 6 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Registering a devm-managed regmap with the syscon subsystem leads to a Use-After-Free.
- [High] The `wfhw->inverted_polarity` field is left uninitialized when disabling the PWM channel, leading to random inactive pin states.
- [Medium] Underflow in duty cycle calculation when hardware DUTY register exceeds RANGE + 1.
- [Medium] Non-atomic read-modify-write sequences on shared global registers race with syscon consumers.
- [Medium] Hardware configuration registers are not restored during system resume.
- [Low] 64-bit modulo and division operations cause link errors on 32-bit platforms.
--

commit b70ebe40d042bfe1fa3353e46fc0881fdfa5686f
Author: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>

pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver

The Raspberry Pi RP1 southbridge features an embedded PWM
controller with 4 output channels, alongside an RPM interface
to read the fan speed on the Raspberry Pi 5.

> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6382a81a5ea0f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c

[ ... ]

> +static void rp1_pwm_apply_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	u32 value;
> +
> +	/* update the changed registers on the next strobe to avoid glitches */
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &value);
> +	value |= RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_SET_UPDATE;
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, value);
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Will this read-modify-write sequence race with syscon consumers?

Since this driver exposes its regmap via syscon to allow other drivers to
access it concurrently, a separate regmap_read() and regmap_write()
releases the internal lock in between.

If a syscon consumer modifies RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL simultaneously, will its
changes be silently overwritten? Should this use regmap_update_bits()
instead?

[ ... ]

> +static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_tohw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +				       struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				       const struct pwm_waveform *wf,
> +				       void *_wfhw)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	u64 period_ticks, duty_ticks, offset_ticks;
> +	struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!wf->period_length_ns) {
> +		wfhw->enabled = false;
> +		return 0;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
Does this early return leave wfhw->inverted_polarity uninitialized?

If the PWM core passes uninitialized memory for _wfhw, returning here
without setting inverted_polarity means rp1_pwm_write_waveform() will later
read uninitialized memory to configure the RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY bit.

Because the hardware drives the pin to 0 or 1 based on polarity when disabled,
could this cause the disabled state to unpredictably flip between high and low?

[ ... ]

> +	duty_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_length_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	duty_ticks = min(duty_ticks, period_ticks);
> +	offset_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_offset_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	if (offset_ticks >= period_ticks)
> +		offset_ticks %= period_ticks;

[Severity: Low]
Will this 64-bit modulo operation cause link errors on 32-bit builds?

Since both offset_ticks and period_ticks are u64, using the modulo
operator directly will emit a call to __umoddi3. Since Kconfig allows
COMPILE_TEST, will this break the build on 32-bit architectures?

[ ... ]

> +static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_fromhw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +					 struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +					 const void *_wfhw,
> +					 struct pwm_waveform *wf)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
> +	u64 ticks;
> +
> +	*wf = (struct pwm_waveform){ };
> +
> +	if (!wfhw->enabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	wf->period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(((u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1) * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +						clk_rate);
> +
> +	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity) {
> +		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)wfhw->duty_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +						      clk_rate);

[Severity: Low]
Is it safe to pass clk_rate as a u64 divisor to DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL()?

DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL uses do_div() internally which expects a 32-bit divisor.
Will this cause division helpers to be missing during 32-bit builds?

> +	} else {
> +		ticks = (u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1 - wfhw->duty_ticks;

[Severity: Medium]
Can this calculation underflow if the hardware DUTY register exceeds RANGE + 1?

rp1_pwm_read_waveform() fetches period_ticks and duty_ticks directly from
the hardware registers without clamping. If the bootloader configures a
duty cycle greater than the period (to force a continuous 100% output),
would this undergo an unsigned underflow?

Could this result in an astronomically large u64 value for ticks, corrupting
the reported duty_length_ns?

> +		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
> +		wf->duty_offset_ns = wf->period_length_ns - wf->duty_length_ns;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_write_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +				  struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				  const void *_wfhw)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u32 value, ctrl;
> +
> +	/* set polarity */
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), &value);
> +	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity)
> +		value &= ~RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
> +	else
> +		value |= RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), value);

[Severity: Medium]
Is this another non-atomic read-modify-write susceptible to data races?

Similar to rp1_pwm_apply_config(), will syscon consumer modifications to
RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL be lost if they occur between the read and write?

[ ... ]

> +static int rp1_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[ ... ]
> +	rp1->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &rp1_pwm_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rp1->regmap))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rp1->regmap), "Cannot initialize regmap\n");
[ ... ]
> +	ret = of_syscon_register_regmap(np, rp1->regmap);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register syscon\n");
> +		goto err_remove_chip;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_remove_chip:
> +	pwmchip_remove(chip);
> +err_disable_clk:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rp1_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> +	pwmchip_remove(chip);
> +
> +	if (rp1->clk_enabled) {
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
> +		rp1->clk_enabled = false;
> +	}
> +}

[Severity: High]
Will registering a devm-managed regmap with the syscon subsystem lead to a
use-after-free on device unbind?

The syscon subsystem stores this regmap pointer in a global, permanent list
and provides no API to unregister it. If the RP1 device is unbound, devres
will automatically free the regmap memory.

Would any subsequent syscon lookup by consumers return this freed memory,
triggering a use-after-free?

[ ... ]

> +static int rp1_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clock on resume: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	rp1->clk_enabled = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Does the resume handler need to restore the hardware register state?

The PM operations only toggle the clock, but do not save and restore the
PWM configuration registers (such as RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, CHAN_CTRL, RANGE,
DUTY), and the regmap lacks a cache configuration to do this automatically.

If the hardware loses its state during S3 suspend, will the controller
wake up in its default reset state (stopped), breaking consumer devices
that expect the PWM signal to be maintained?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1780670224.git.andrea.porta@suse.com?part=2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-06-12 14:29   ` Sean Young
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sean Young @ 2026-06-12 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea della Porta
  Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, devicetree,
	linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Naushir Patuck,
	Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger

On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 04:01:27PM +0200, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> From: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
> 
> The Raspberry Pi RP1 southbridge features an embedded PWM
> controller with 4 output channels, alongside an RPM interface
> to read the fan speed on the Raspberry Pi 5.
> 
> Add the supporting driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
> Co-developed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/Kconfig   |   9 +
>  drivers/pwm/Makefile  |   1 +
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c | 424 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 434 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 6f3147518376a..c3ddc0eb4774f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -625,6 +625,15 @@ config PWM_ROCKCHIP
>  	  Generic PWM framework driver for the PWM controller found on
>  	  Rockchip SoCs.
>  
> +config PWM_RASPBERRYPI_RP1
> +	tristate "RP1 PWM support"
> +	depends on MISC_RP1 || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on HAS_IOMEM
> +	select REGMAP_MMIO
> +	select MFD_SYSCON
> +	help
> +	  PWM framework driver for Raspberry Pi RP1 controller.
> +
>  config PWM_SAMSUNG
>  	tristate "Samsung PWM support"
>  	depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index 0dc0d2b69025d..59f29f60f9123 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_RZG2L_GPT)	+= pwm-rzg2l-gpt.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_RZ_MTU3)	+= pwm-rz-mtu3.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU)	+= pwm-renesas-tpu.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP)	+= pwm-rockchip.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RASPBERRYPI_RP1)	+= pwm-rp1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG)	+= pwm-samsung.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE)	+= pwm-sifive.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SL28CPLD)	+= pwm-sl28cpld.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6382a81a5ea0f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rp1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * pwm-rp1.c
> + *
> + * Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM.
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2026 Raspberry Pi Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Naushir Patuck (naush@raspberrypi.com)
> + *
> + * Based on the pwm-bcm2835 driver by:
> + * Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be>
> + *
> + * Datasheet: https://pip-assets.raspberrypi.com/categories/892-raspberry-pi-5/documents/RP-008370-DS-1-rp1-peripherals.pdf?disposition=inline
> + *
> + * Limitations:
> + * - Channels can be enabled/disabled through a global update flag, while the
> + *   period and duty per-channel registers are independently updatable, and
> + *   they are latched on the end of (specific channel) period strobe.
> + *   This means that period and duty changes might result in glitches if the
> + *   period/duty is changed exactly during an end of period strobe.
> + * - Since the duty/period registers are freely updatable (do not depend on
> + *   the global update flag), setting one of them close to the period end and
> + *   the other right afterwards results in a mixed output for that cycle because
> + *   the write ops are not atomic.
> + * - The global update flag prevents mis-sampling of multi-bit bus signals in
> + *   the PWM clock domain. This ensures that all PWM channel settings update
> + *   on the same PWM clock cycle. Channels start in sync only if they share the
> + *   same period.
> + * - If both duty and period are set to 0, the output is a constant low signal
> + *   if polarity is normal or a constant high signal if polarity is inversed.
> + * - When disabled the output is driven to 0 if polarity is normal, or to 1
> + *   if polarity is inversed.
> + * - Disabling the PWM stops the output immediately, without waiting for current
> + *   period to complete first.
> + * - Channels are phase-capable, but on RPi5, the firmware can use a channel
> + *   phase register to report the RPM of the fan connected to that PWM
> + *   channel. As a result, phase control will be ignored for now.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/units.h>
> +
> +#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL			0x000
> +#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(chan)	BIT(chan)
> +#define RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_SET_UPDATE		BIT(31)
> +
> +#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(chan)			(0x014 + ((chan) * 0x10))
> +#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY		BIT(3)
> +#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_FIFO_POP_MASK		BIT(8)
> +#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE			GENMASK(2, 0)
> +enum rp1_pwm_ctrl_mode {
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_ZERO,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_TE_MS,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PC_MS,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PD_ENC,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_MSB_SER,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_PPM,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_LE_MS,
> +	RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_LSB_SER,
> +};
> +
> +#define RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_DEFAULT		(RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_FIFO_POP_MASK +  \
> +						FIELD_PREP(RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE, \
> +						RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_MODE_TE_MS))
> +
> +#define RP1_PWM_RANGE(chan)			(0x018 + ((chan) * 0x10))
> +#define RP1_PWM_PHASE(chan)			(0x01C + ((chan) * 0x10))
> +#define RP1_PWM_DUTY(chan)			(0x020 + ((chan) * 0x10))
> +
> +#define RP1_PWM_NUM_PWMS			4
> +
> +struct rp1_pwm {
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	bool clk_enabled;

I don't understand the point of the clk_enabled field. If the probe
function succeeds, then clk_enabled = true. It is set to false during
suspend, but after suspend the only thing which can follow is resume,
I think. In resume, we set it in to true again unconditionally. So
it is always true, no?

> +};
> +
> +struct rp1_pwm_waveform {
> +	u32 period_ticks;
> +	u32 duty_ticks;
> +	bool enabled;
> +	bool inverted_polarity;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config rp1_pwm_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits = 32,
> +	.val_bits = 32,
> +	.reg_stride = 4,
> +	.max_register = 0x60,
> +};
> +
> +static void rp1_pwm_apply_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	u32 value;
> +
> +	/* update the changed registers on the next strobe to avoid glitches */
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &value);
> +	value |= RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_SET_UPDATE;
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, value);
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> +	/* init channel to reset defaults, preserving the polarity bit */
> +	regmap_update_bits(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm),
> +			   ~(u32)RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_DEFAULT);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_tohw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +				       struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				       const struct pwm_waveform *wf,
> +				       void *_wfhw)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	u64 period_ticks, duty_ticks, offset_ticks;
> +	struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!wf->period_length_ns) {
> +		wfhw->enabled = false;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	period_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->period_length_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The period is limited to U32_MAX, and it will be decremented by one later
> +	 * to allow 100% duty cycle.
> +	 */
> +	if (period_ticks > U32_MAX) {
> +		period_ticks = U32_MAX;
> +	} else if (period_ticks < 2) {
> +		period_ticks = 2;
> +		ret = 1;
> +	}

period_ticks = clamp(period_ticks, 2, U32_MAX);

Although that misses out the `ret = 1;` which I am not sure about anyway.

> +
> +	duty_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_length_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	duty_ticks = min(duty_ticks, period_ticks);
> +	offset_ticks = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->duty_offset_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	if (offset_ticks >= period_ticks)
> +		offset_ticks %= period_ticks;
> +	if (duty_ticks && offset_ticks &&
> +	    duty_ticks + offset_ticks >= period_ticks) {
> +		wfhw->duty_ticks = period_ticks - duty_ticks;
> +		wfhw->inverted_polarity = true;
> +	} else {
> +		wfhw->duty_ticks = duty_ticks;
> +		wfhw->inverted_polarity = false;
> +	}
> +	/* Account for the extra tick at the end of the period */
> +	wfhw->period_ticks = period_ticks - 1;
> +
> +	wfhw->enabled = true;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_round_waveform_fromhw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +					 struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +					 const void *_wfhw,
> +					 struct pwm_waveform *wf)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u64 clk_rate = rp1->clk_rate;
> +	u64 ticks;
> +
> +	*wf = (struct pwm_waveform){ };
> +
> +	if (!wfhw->enabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	wf->period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(((u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1) * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +						clk_rate);
> +
> +	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity) {
> +		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)wfhw->duty_ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC,
> +						      clk_rate);
> +	} else {
> +		ticks = (u64)wfhw->period_ticks + 1 - wfhw->duty_ticks;
> +		wf->duty_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ticks * NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
> +		wf->duty_offset_ns = wf->period_length_ns - wf->duty_length_ns;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_write_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +				  struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				  const void *_wfhw)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	const struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u32 value, ctrl;
> +
> +	/* set polarity */
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), &value);
> +	if (!wfhw->inverted_polarity)
> +		value &= ~RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
> +	else
> +		value |= RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY;
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), value);
> +
> +	/* early exit if disabled */
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &ctrl);
> +	if (!wfhw->enabled) {
> +		ctrl &= ~RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm);
> +		goto exit_disable;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* set period and duty cycle */
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap,
> +		     RP1_PWM_RANGE(pwm->hwpwm), wfhw->period_ticks);
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap,
> +		     RP1_PWM_DUTY(pwm->hwpwm), wfhw->duty_ticks);
> +
> +	/* enable the channel */
> +	ctrl |= RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm);
> +exit_disable:
> +	regmap_write(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, ctrl);
> +
> +	rp1_pwm_apply_config(chip, pwm);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_read_waveform(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> +				 struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +				 void *_wfhw)
> +{
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	struct rp1_pwm_waveform *wfhw = _wfhw;
> +	u32 value;
> +
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL, &value);
> +	wfhw->enabled = !!(value & RP1_PWM_GLB_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> +	regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm), &value);
> +	wfhw->inverted_polarity = !!(value & RP1_PWM_CHAN_CTRL_POLARITY);
> +
> +	if (wfhw->enabled) {
> +		regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_RANGE(pwm->hwpwm), &wfhw->period_ticks);
> +		regmap_read(rp1->regmap, RP1_PWM_DUTY(pwm->hwpwm), &wfhw->duty_ticks);
> +	} else {
> +		wfhw->period_ticks = 0;
> +		wfhw->duty_ticks = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops rp1_pwm_ops = {
> +	.sizeof_wfhw = sizeof(struct rp1_pwm_waveform),
> +	.request = rp1_pwm_request,
> +	.round_waveform_tohw = rp1_pwm_round_waveform_tohw,
> +	.round_waveform_fromhw = rp1_pwm_round_waveform_fromhw,
> +	.read_waveform = rp1_pwm_read_waveform,
> +	.write_waveform = rp1_pwm_write_waveform,
> +};
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip;
> +	void __iomem	*base;
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(dev, RP1_PWM_NUM_PWMS, sizeof(*rp1));
> +	if (IS_ERR(chip))
> +		return PTR_ERR(chip);
> +
> +	rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> +	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> +	rp1->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &rp1_pwm_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rp1->regmap))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rp1->regmap), "Cannot initialize regmap\n");
> +
> +	rp1->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rp1->clk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rp1->clk), "Clock not found\n");
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to enable clock\n");
> +	rp1->clk_enabled = true;
> +
> +	ret = devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get(dev, rp1->clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get exclusive rate\n");
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +	}
> +
> +	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(rp1->clk);
> +	if (!clk_rate) {
> +		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to get clock rate\n");
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * To prevent u64 overflow in period calculations:
> +	 * mul_u64_u64_div_u64(period_ns, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC)
> +	 * If clk_rate > 1 GHz, the result can overflow.
> +	 */
> +	if (clk_rate > HZ_PER_GHZ) {
> +		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Clock rate > 1 GHz is not supported\n");
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +	}
> +	rp1->clk_rate = clk_rate;
> +
> +	chip->ops = &rp1_pwm_ops;

Can we add the following please:

	 chip->atomic = true; 

This means that the pwm can be controlled from atomic context (not process
context) using pwm_apply_atomic(). This is very helpful for the pwm-ir-tx
driver, which produces a much more faithful IR signal in atomic context.

Using pwm for infrared tx is much nicer than using gpio which bit bangs
the IR signal and holds the CPU with interrupts disabled for upto one second.

As far as I can see there is no sleeping code in these code paths, so we
should be fine.

Thanks,

Sean

> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
> +
> +	ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = of_syscon_register_regmap(np, rp1->regmap);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register syscon\n");
> +		goto err_remove_chip;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_remove_chip:
> +	pwmchip_remove(chip);
> +err_disable_clk:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rp1_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> +	pwmchip_remove(chip);
> +
> +	if (rp1->clk_enabled) {
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
> +		rp1->clk_enabled = false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +
> +	if (rp1->clk_enabled) {
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(rp1->clk);
> +		rp1->clk_enabled = false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rp1_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct rp1_pwm *rp1 = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rp1->clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clock on resume: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	rp1->clk_enabled = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rp1_pwm_pm_ops, rp1_pwm_suspend, rp1_pwm_resume);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rp1_pwm_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "raspberrypi,rp1-pwm" },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rp1_pwm_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rp1_pwm_driver = {
> +	.probe = rp1_pwm_probe,
> +	.remove = rp1_pwm_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "rp1-pwm",
> +		.of_match_table = rp1_pwm_of_match,
> +		.pm = pm_ptr(&rp1_pwm_pm_ops),
> +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +	},
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(rp1_pwm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RP1 PWM driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
  2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
  2026-06-12 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-06-12 15:24   ` Stanimir Varbanov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stanimir Varbanov @ 2026-06-12 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea della Porta, Uwe Kleine-König, linux-pwm, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Florian Fainelli,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, devicetree,
	linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Naushir Patuck,
	Stanimir Varbanov, mbrugger
  Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski



On 6/12/26 5:01 PM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> From: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
> 
> Add the devicetree binding documentation for the PWM
> controller found in the Raspberry Pi RP1 chipset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
> Co-developed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml     | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6f8461d0454f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/raspberrypi,rp1-pwm.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>

Could you add you or me as a maintainer as well. I'm not sure Naushir
had agreed to maintain the bindings in mainline.

~Stan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-12 19:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-12 14:01 [PATCH v5 0/3] Add RP1 PWM controller support Andrea della Porta
2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add Raspberry Pi RP1 PWM controller Andrea della Porta
2026-06-12 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 15:24   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pwm: rp1: Add RP1 PWM controller driver Andrea della Porta
2026-06-12 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 14:29   ` Sean Young
2026-06-12 14:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: dts: broadcom: rpi-5: Add RP1 PWM node Andrea della Porta

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.