* [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries
2026-10-15 11:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf/x86: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Sandipan Das
@ 2026-10-15 11:46 ` Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " Sandipan Das
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sandipan Das @ 2026-10-15 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, James Clark, Thomas Gleixner,
Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H . Peter Anvin, Dapeng Mi,
Andrii Nakryiko, Song Liu, Ravi Bangoria, Ananth Narayan,
Sandipan Das
The branch snapshot callback used by bpf_get_branch_snapshot() copies
up to x86_pmu.lbr_nr entries from cpuc->lbr_entries[], even when the
last LBR read kept fewer branches. The entries past lbr_stack.nr are
invalid, but they end up reaching BPF programs.
Limit copying to lbr_stack.nr entries and also reset lbr_stack.nr when
amd_pmu_lbr_read() skips reading the registers, so that a stale count
is never reused.
Fixes: a4d18112e531 ("perf/x86/amd: Support capturing LBR from software events")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-163130@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
index 49b6b8fce566..bf631f60757c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int amd_pmu_v2_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries, u
cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
amd_pmu_lbr_read();
- cnt = min(cnt, x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
+ cnt = min(cnt, cpuc->lbr_stack.nr);
memcpy(entries, cpuc->lbr_entries, sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) * cnt);
amd_pmu_v2_enable_all(0);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
index 1e1b2f08cb51..a00d3850c4a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
@@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ void amd_pmu_lbr_read(void)
struct branch_entry entry;
int out = 0, idx, i;
- if (!cpuc->lbr_users)
+ if (!cpuc->lbr_users) {
+ cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = 0;
return;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
entry.from.full = amd_pmu_lbr_get_from(i);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries
2026-10-15 11:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf/x86: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: " Sandipan Das
@ 2026-10-15 11:46 ` Sandipan Das
2026-10-15 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sandipan Das @ 2026-10-15 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, bpf
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, James Clark, Thomas Gleixner,
Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86, H . Peter Anvin, Dapeng Mi,
Andrii Nakryiko, Song Liu, Ravi Bangoria, Ananth Narayan,
Sandipan Das
The branch snapshot callback used by bpf_get_branch_snapshot() always
copies x86_pmu.lbr_nr entries from cpuc->lbr_entries[], even when the
last LBR read kept fewer branches. The entries past lbr_stack.nr hold
invalid branches which end up reaching BPF programs.
Limit copying to lbr_stack.nr entries and also reset lbr_stack.nr when
intel_pmu_lbr_read() skips reading the registers so that a stale count
is never reused.
Fixes: c22ac2a3d4bd ("perf: Enable branch record for software events")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-163130@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 0a34d674df59..5dfb9e9156e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ __intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries,
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
intel_pmu_lbr_read();
- cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
+ cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, cpuc->lbr_stack.nr);
memcpy(entries, cpuc->lbr_entries, sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) * cnt);
intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 0b446d8912e4..6b070490f461 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1026,8 +1026,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
* but this simple approach seems to work for now.
*/
if (!cpuc->lbr_users || vlbr_exclude_host() ||
- cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users)
+ cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users) {
+ cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = 0;
return;
+ }
x86_pmu.lbr_read(cpuc);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread