From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"John Crispin" <john@phrozen.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: add compatible for MT7988
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:34:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4391868-ddcd-4f66-b539-28d245fa83df@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213-resource-evaluator-0754cfd5882d@spud>
On 13.02.2024 19:18, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> MT7988 has on-SoC controller that can control up to 8 PWMs.
>
> I see a binding and a dts patch, but no driver patch, how come?
I believe that to avoid cross-trees patchsets (which are sometimes
tricky for maintainers) there are two ways of submiting such changes:
1. dt-binding + driver; then (separately) DTS
2. dt-binding + DTS; then (separately) driver
I chose later in this case as my personal priority right now is to deal
with all MediaTek DTS files.
Is that wrong or unacceptable?
> Also, what makes this incompatibly different with the other devices in
> the binding, like the 8183?
It can control 8 PWMs unlike any other SoC block except for MT2712.
It uses different registers than MT2712 thought.
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> index 0fbe8a6469eb..a5c308801619 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>> - mediatek,mt7629-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7981-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7986-pwm
>> + - mediatek,mt7988-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8183-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8365-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8516-pwm
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"John Crispin" <john@phrozen.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: add compatible for MT7988
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:34:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4391868-ddcd-4f66-b539-28d245fa83df@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213-resource-evaluator-0754cfd5882d@spud>
On 13.02.2024 19:18, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> MT7988 has on-SoC controller that can control up to 8 PWMs.
>
> I see a binding and a dts patch, but no driver patch, how come?
I believe that to avoid cross-trees patchsets (which are sometimes
tricky for maintainers) there are two ways of submiting such changes:
1. dt-binding + driver; then (separately) DTS
2. dt-binding + DTS; then (separately) driver
I chose later in this case as my personal priority right now is to deal
with all MediaTek DTS files.
Is that wrong or unacceptable?
> Also, what makes this incompatibly different with the other devices in
> the binding, like the 8183?
It can control 8 PWMs unlike any other SoC block except for MT2712.
It uses different registers than MT2712 thought.
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> index 0fbe8a6469eb..a5c308801619 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>> - mediatek,mt7629-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7981-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7986-pwm
>> + - mediatek,mt7988-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8183-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8365-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8516-pwm
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 16:46 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: add compatible for MT7988 Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-13 16:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7988: add PWM controller Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-13 16:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-14 9:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-14 9:09 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-14 9:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-14 9:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-14 9:33 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-14 9:33 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-13 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: add compatible for MT7988 Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-13 17:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-14 9:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-14 9:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-16 13:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-16 13:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-13 18:18 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-13 18:18 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-14 6:34 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2024-02-14 6:34 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-14 9:27 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-14 9:27 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-02-14 10:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-14 10:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-14 10:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-14 10:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2024-02-16 8:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-16 8:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-02-16 9:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-16 9:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4391868-ddcd-4f66-b539-28d245fa83df@gmail.com \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.