* [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
@ 2026-08-14 12:58 Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-14 17:18 ` Eric Farman
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2026-08-14 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Eric Farman, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne,
Ilya Leoshkevich, Matthew Rosato, Christian Borntraeger
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
"necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index 3c8cb164888..b452f2ce54d 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
out_write:
s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,
- be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length));
+ be16_to_cpu(header.length));
sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR);
return 0;
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
2026-08-14 12:58 [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer Christian Borntraeger
@ 2026-08-14 17:18 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-18 21:07 ` Matthew Rosato
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Farman @ 2026-08-14 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger, Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne, Ilya Leoshkevich,
Matthew Rosato, Christian Borntraeger
On 8/14/26 8:58 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>
> With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
> change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
> length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
> buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
> Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
> "necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
> tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
>
> Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
> and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
> the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
>
> Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
2026-08-14 12:58 [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-14 17:18 ` Eric Farman
@ 2026-08-18 21:07 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-19 11:06 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-27 5:52 ` Michael Tokarev
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Rosato @ 2026-08-18 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger, Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Eric Farman, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne,
Ilya Leoshkevich, Christian Borntraeger
On 8/14/26 8:58 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>
> With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
> change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
> length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
> buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
> Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
> "necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
> tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
>
> Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
> and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
> the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
>
> Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
2026-08-14 12:58 [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-14 17:18 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-18 21:07 ` Matthew Rosato
@ 2026-08-19 11:06 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-20 6:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-08-27 5:52 ` Michael Tokarev
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Farman @ 2026-08-19 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger, Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne, Ilya Leoshkevich,
Matthew Rosato, Christian Borntraeger
On 8/14/26 8:58 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>
> With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
> change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
> length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
> buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
> Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
> "necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
> tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
>
> Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
> and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
> the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
>
> Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks! Applied for 11.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
2026-08-19 11:06 ` Eric Farman
@ 2026-08-20 6:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2026-08-20 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Farman, Christian Borntraeger, Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne, Ilya Leoshkevich,
Matthew Rosato, Christian Borntraeger
On 19/8/26 13:06, Eric Farman wrote:
>
>
> On 8/14/26 8:58 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
>> change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
>> length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
>> buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
>> Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
>> "necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
>> tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
>>
>> Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
>> and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
>> the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
>>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Thanks! Applied for 11.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer
2026-08-14 12:58 [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer Christian Borntraeger
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-19 11:06 ` Eric Farman
@ 2026-08-27 5:52 ` Michael Tokarev
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2026-08-27 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger, Cornelia Huck
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-s390x, David Hildenbrand, Richard Henderson,
Janosch Frank, Eric Farman, Halil Pasic, Jason Herne,
Ilya Leoshkevich, Matthew Rosato, Christian Borntraeger,
QEMU Stable
On 8/14/26 15:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
>
> With variable length and EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, some callbacks might
> change the length field. For example read SCP info might write a new
> length into the SCCB header. We must not use that new length for the
> buffer copy, since the buffer was allocated with the original length.
> Only the length field in the work SCCB is changed, to indicate the
> "necessary" size. Using the new length reads past the allocation, so
> tools like ASAN might detect a buffer overrun.
>
> Secure guests do not have EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, and the ultravisor checks
> and sanitizes the length field, so no qemu heap contents are exposed to
> the guest and the non pv-path already has the same header.length.
>
> Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm picking this one up for the currently active stable qemu series.
Please let me know if I shouldn't.
Thanks,
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-27 5:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-14 12:58 [PATCH] s390x/sclp: pv: only copy the original SCCB buffer Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-14 17:18 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-18 21:07 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-19 11:06 ` Eric Farman
2026-08-20 6:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-08-27 5:52 ` Michael Tokarev
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.