All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Falsig <simon@newtec.dk>
To: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, frank.rowand@am.sony.com
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Real-time kernel thread performance and optimization
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d63382c92165debf7dfcb7c5a6097ee6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BCB40E.9050304@osadl.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Emde [mailto:C.Emde@osadl.org]
> Sent: 3. december 2012 15:16
> To: frank.rowand@am.sony.com
> Cc: Simon Falsig; linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Real-time kernel thread performance and optimization
>
> On 11/30/2012 11:31 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 11/30/12 07:46, Simon Falsig wrote:
> >> [..]
> >> Bonus-question:
> >>   - Additionally, I've tried running cyclictest alongside with all
> >> the above, and it actually performs rather well, without any
> >> substantial spikes. A strange thing is though, that the results are
> >> actually better with load than without? (running with -t1 -p 80 -n -i
10000 -l
> 10000)
> >>   - Loaded: Min: 16, Avg: 41, Max: 177
> >>   - No load: Min: 16, Avg: 97, Max: 263
> >
> > If the system is less loaded, then the idle thread might be able to
> > enter deeper levels of sleep.  Deeper levels of sleep have larger
> > latencies to exit.  You would have to look at your processor specific
> > values for exiting sleep states to see if this is sufficient to
> > explain the difference.
> If running a half-decent version of cyclictest, sleep states are
generally
> disabled while cyclictest is running. Please watch the line
>    # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> which essentially documents this mechanism. Yes, the name of the
variable
> "cpu_dma_latency" is not obvious and cyclictest could do a better job by
> writing
>    Wrote 0 to /dev/cpu_dma_latency and keeping the path open to prevent
>    all cores from entering any sleep state but this is another story.
>
> A patch that was merged to 3.7 allows to individually enable or disable
sleep
> states of the ladder governor
>
(http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=6
2d
> 6ae880e3e76098d5e345decd2dce443975889).
> It smoothly applies to 3.6-RT as well. This allows to fine-tune the
sleep states
> by state and core, while the /dev/cpu_dma_latency mechanism acts on all
> states and cores, e.g. to disable sleep state 2 and all deeper states of
the
> ladder governor on core #0, use:
>    echo 1 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state2/disable
>
> BTW: To analyze how much time a core spent in a specific sleep state,
simply
> look repeatedly at the "time" variable of a core's sleep state, e.g. for
core #0:
> # for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state[0-4]
>  > do
>  > echo -e "`cat $i/name`:\t`cat $i/time`"
>  > done
> POLL:	1342984105
> C1-IVB:	737109
> C3-IVB:	3852451
> C6-IVB:	1702683112
> C7-IVB:	4366946606
> While cyclictest is running with /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0, only the
POLL
> state times are increasing.
>
> 	-Carsten.

Thanks for the reply! As I wrote in my reply to Frank, I'm not completely
sure if P states are correctly implemented in our system. We're using a
custom BIOS for our custom board, and while P states do show up and are
modifiable (I've currently installed the userspace-governor, and am
manually setting the clock-frequency to the lowest possible at startup),
our board guy is not sure that changing it actually has any effect on the
processor. Yay...:/
So until I get a go-ahead on this, I'll wait with a further investigation.

Best regards,
Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-11 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-30 15:46 Real-time kernel thread performance and optimization Simon Falsig
2012-11-30 22:31 ` Frank Rowand
2012-12-03 12:39   ` Simon Falsig
2012-12-03 14:15   ` Carsten Emde
2012-12-11 14:43     ` Simon Falsig [this message]
2012-12-19  8:10       ` Carsten Emde
2012-12-20  8:09         ` Simon Falsig
2012-12-19 14:59     ` John Kacur
2012-12-19 15:20       ` Carsten Emde
2012-12-11 14:30   ` Simon Falsig
2012-12-17 22:18     ` Frank Rowand
2012-12-20  0:11       ` Darren Hart
2012-12-20  8:21         ` Simon Falsig
2013-01-02 17:21           ` Darren Hart
2012-12-12 15:39   ` Simon Falsig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-11  6:32 Simon Falsig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d63382c92165debf7dfcb7c5a6097ee6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=simon@newtec.dk \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.