[BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[GG]

Hi there,

I apologize in advance if this isn't the right place to send this. I ran into
a quirk on my own machine, went digging, and ended up working out what causes
it, so I figured it was probably worth sharing. Please feel free to ignore all
of this if it's not useful or doesn't apply.

Before you read any further, three things you should probably know:

  - I'm not a programmer. I can tell you what my hardware does, and I ran
    every test below myself on it, but if you ask me to defend the actual
    implementation I'll be out of my depth pretty quickly.

  - I worked this out with an AI coding assistant (Claude, claude-opus-5) over
    a long back-and-forth debugging session. It suggested things to try and
    wrote the instrumented test modules, and I built and ran each one on this
    machine and fed the results back. It drafted this write-up too, and I've
    edited it.

  - So this isn't a formal patch submission and there's deliberately no
    Signed-off-by on it. Treat it as a bug report that happens to come with a
    suggestion attached, and please feel free to bin the patch entirely and do
    something completely different.

The one thing I can offer that might actually be worth something is the
hardware. This machine reproduces the problem every single time, so I'm happy
to test whatever you'd like, in whatever form.

Anyway, here's what I found.

spd5118_resume() fails with -ENXIO on every single suspend/resume cycle here,
and I think it's because the SPD hubs on this board are write protected by the
platform firmware.

Hardware:
  Gigabyte Z790 AORUS PRO X, BIOS F11a
  Intel i9-14900KS
  2x 32GB DDR5, hubs at i2c 12-0051 and 12-0053
  Both report: DDR5 temperature sensor: vendor 0x06:0x32 revision 1.6
  Kernel 7.1.8 (CachyOS)

This shows up on every resume:

  spd5118 12-0051: Failed to write b = 0: -6
  spd5118 12-0051: PM: dpm_run_callback(): spd5118_resume returns -6
  spd5118 12-0051: PM: spd5118_resume returned -6 after 15085 usecs
  spd5118 12-0051: PM: failed to resume async: error -6

The sensor itself works fine either side of a suspend and the configured
limits survive, so nothing is actually broken for me as a user. It's just the
error, plus 5-18ms of pointless failing SMBus traffic per DIMM every time.

The thing that finally made it click is that this has nothing to do with
suspend or resume at all. These hubs refuse writes all the time. Writing
temp1_max back to the exact value it already holds, on a fully booted and idle
system, fails the same way:

  $ cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max
  55000
  $ sudo sh -c 'echo 55000 > /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max'
  sh: line 1: echo: write error: No such device or address

Reads are completely unaffected. During resume, raw i2c_smbus_read_byte_data()
on MR11 and on every other register succeeds on the first try and returns
sensible values. Every single i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() comes back -ENXIO.

Which means this, in spd5118_suspend():

  regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
                     SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);

is failing silently, because its return value isn't checked. The sensor never
actually gets disabled. But the cache still gets marked dirty, so on resume
regcache_sync() goes off to restore state that was never changed in the first
place.

The error message itself sent me down the wrong path for quite a while. It
doesn't come from the sync, it comes from regcache_sync()'s epilogue, which
force-writes every regmap range selector and then hands that write's error
back as its own return value. For spd5118 in I2C legacy mode that selector is
MR11, which is also a cached writeable register, and with window_start 0 and
window_len 0x100 it sits inside its own paging window. That's why the message
singles out register 0xb, which had me convinced for ages that there was
something specifically wrong with MR11.

Dead ends, in case it saves anyone else the time:

  - Dropping MR11 from the regcache before the sync does silence the "Failed
    to write b = 0" message, but resume still fails, because the next register
    isn't writeable either.
  - MR11 already reads back as 0 on resume, so there's no stale page.
  - Reads succeed on the first attempt, so the hub isn't slow to wake up.
  - Polling for a write to be accepted for up to 2 seconds never got one
    through, and added 3 seconds to resume.
  - Pinning i2c-i801 to power/control=on for the whole cycle changes nothing.
    The adapter isn't marked suspended at that point either:
    __i2c_check_suspended() (drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h) returns -ESHUTDOWN and
    emits a "Transfer while suspended" dev_WARN, and neither of those shows up
    anywhere in my logs.

The patch below is what ended up working for me here: check whether the device
actually accepted that suspend-time write, and if it didn't, don't bother
marking the cache dirty or syncing on resume. With it applied, resume returns
0 in 0us and the error is gone. I ran 5 suspend/resume cycles on a fresh boot
with no debug kernel options, and /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats went from
success=0 failed_resume=0 to success=5 failed_resume=0, with temperatures and
limits unaffected throughout.

One thing I can't check myself: I don't have any hardware with a hub that does
accept writes, so I can't confirm the normal path still behaves properly on a
machine like that.

Candidate change against drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c:

--- a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct spd5118_data {
 	struct regmap *regmap;
 	struct mutex nvmem_lock;
 	bool is_16bit;
+	bool suspend_wp;	/* device NAKed the suspend write: nothing to restore */
 };

@@ -498,10 +499,27 @@ static int spd5118_suspend(struct device *dev)
 		return err;

 	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, true);
-	regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
-			   SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
+	err = regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG,
+				 SPD5118_TS_DISABLE, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
 	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, false);

+	/*
+	 * Platform firmware may write protect the SPD hub after memory
+	 * training, in which case the device serves reads but NAKs every write
+	 * with -ENXIO. The temperature sensor was then never disabled, so
+	 * there is no device state to restore on resume.
+	 */
+	data->suspend_wp = err < 0;
+	if (data->suspend_wp) {
+		dev_dbg(dev, "write protected, skipping state save (%d)\n", err);
+		/* Still avoid bus traffic while suspended. */
+		regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
 	regcache_mark_dirty(regmap);

@@ -514,6 +532,10 @@ static int spd5118_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;

 	regcache_cache_only(regmap, false);
+
+	if (data->suspend_wp)
+		return 0;
+
 	return regcache_sync(regmap);
 }

As far as I can tell this goes back to d1b4c755081a ("hwmon: (spd5118) Add
suspend/resume support"), which first shipped in v6.11.

Thanks for taking a look, and no worries at all if this isn't useful.

Gabriel G

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[GG]

Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last email. I've since
found this from February, which is the same problem:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/

And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:

  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set

So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.

One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has spd5118 refuse to
probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me two working
temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct temps,
and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing that fails.

Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.

Gabriel G

On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:29 PM, GG <ggirouard@bungeetaco.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> I apologize in advance if this isn't the right place to send this. I ran into
> a quirk on my own machine, went digging, and ended up working out what causes
> it, so I figured it was probably worth sharing. Please feel free to ignore all
> of this if it's not useful or doesn't apply.
> 
> Before you read any further, three things you should probably know:
> 
>   - I'm not a programmer. I can tell you what my hardware does, and I ran
>     every test below myself on it, but if you ask me to defend the actual
>     implementation I'll be out of my depth pretty quickly.
> 
>   - I worked this out with an AI coding assistant (Claude, claude-opus-5) over
>     a long back-and-forth debugging session. It suggested things to try and
>     wrote the instrumented test modules, and I built and ran each one on this
>     machine and fed the results back. It drafted this write-up too, and I've
>     edited it.
> 
>   - So this isn't a formal patch submission and there's deliberately no
>     Signed-off-by on it. Treat it as a bug report that happens to come with a
>     suggestion attached, and please feel free to bin the patch entirely and do
>     something completely different.
> 
> The one thing I can offer that might actually be worth something is the
> hardware. This machine reproduces the problem every single time, so I'm happy
> to test whatever you'd like, in whatever form.
> 
> Anyway, here's what I found.
> 
> spd5118_resume() fails with -ENXIO on every single suspend/resume cycle here,
> and I think it's because the SPD hubs on this board are write protected by the
> platform firmware.
> 
> Hardware:
>   Gigabyte Z790 AORUS PRO X, BIOS F11a
>   Intel i9-14900KS
>   2x 32GB DDR5, hubs at i2c 12-0051 and 12-0053
>   Both report: DDR5 temperature sensor: vendor 0x06:0x32 revision 1.6
>   Kernel 7.1.8 (CachyOS)
> 
> This shows up on every resume:
> 
>   spd5118 12-0051: Failed to write b = 0: -6
>   spd5118 12-0051: PM: dpm_run_callback(): spd5118_resume returns -6
>   spd5118 12-0051: PM: spd5118_resume returned -6 after 15085 usecs
>   spd5118 12-0051: PM: failed to resume async: error -6
> 
> The sensor itself works fine either side of a suspend and the configured
> limits survive, so nothing is actually broken for me as a user. It's just the
> error, plus 5-18ms of pointless failing SMBus traffic per DIMM every time.
> 
> The thing that finally made it click is that this has nothing to do with
> suspend or resume at all. These hubs refuse writes all the time. Writing
> temp1_max back to the exact value it already holds, on a fully booted and idle
> system, fails the same way:
> 
>   $ cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max
>   55000
>   $ sudo sh -c 'echo 55000 > /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max'
>   sh: line 1: echo: write error: No such device or address
> 
> Reads are completely unaffected. During resume, raw i2c_smbus_read_byte_data()
> on MR11 and on every other register succeeds on the first try and returns
> sensible values. Every single i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() comes back -ENXIO.
> 
> Which means this, in spd5118_suspend():
> 
>   regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
>                      SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
> 
> is failing silently, because its return value isn't checked. The sensor never
> actually gets disabled. But the cache still gets marked dirty, so on resume
> regcache_sync() goes off to restore state that was never changed in the first
> place.
> 
> The error message itself sent me down the wrong path for quite a while. It
> doesn't come from the sync, it comes from regcache_sync()'s epilogue, which
> force-writes every regmap range selector and then hands that write's error
> back as its own return value. For spd5118 in I2C legacy mode that selector is
> MR11, which is also a cached writeable register, and with window_start 0 and
> window_len 0x100 it sits inside its own paging window. That's why the message
> singles out register 0xb, which had me convinced for ages that there was
> something specifically wrong with MR11.
> 
> Dead ends, in case it saves anyone else the time:
> 
>   - Dropping MR11 from the regcache before the sync does silence the "Failed
>     to write b = 0" message, but resume still fails, because the next register
>     isn't writeable either.
>   - MR11 already reads back as 0 on resume, so there's no stale page.
>   - Reads succeed on the first attempt, so the hub isn't slow to wake up.
>   - Polling for a write to be accepted for up to 2 seconds never got one
>     through, and added 3 seconds to resume.
>   - Pinning i2c-i801 to power/control=on for the whole cycle changes nothing.
>     The adapter isn't marked suspended at that point either:
>     __i2c_check_suspended() (drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h) returns -ESHUTDOWN and
>     emits a "Transfer while suspended" dev_WARN, and neither of those shows up
>     anywhere in my logs.
> 
> The patch below is what ended up working for me here: check whether the device
> actually accepted that suspend-time write, and if it didn't, don't bother
> marking the cache dirty or syncing on resume. With it applied, resume returns
> 0 in 0us and the error is gone. I ran 5 suspend/resume cycles on a fresh boot
> with no debug kernel options, and /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats went from
> success=0 failed_resume=0 to success=5 failed_resume=0, with temperatures and
> limits unaffected throughout.
> 
> One thing I can't check myself: I don't have any hardware with a hub that does
> accept writes, so I can't confirm the normal path still behaves properly on a
> machine like that.
> 
> Candidate change against drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c:
> 
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct spd5118_data {
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct mutex nvmem_lock;
>  	bool is_16bit;
> +	bool suspend_wp;	/* device NAKed the suspend write: nothing to restore */
>  };
> 
> @@ -498,10 +499,27 @@ static int spd5118_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  		return err;
> 
>  	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, true);
> -	regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
> -			   SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
> +	err = regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG,
> +				 SPD5118_TS_DISABLE, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
>  	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, false);
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Platform firmware may write protect the SPD hub after memory
> +	 * training, in which case the device serves reads but NAKs every write
> +	 * with -ENXIO. The temperature sensor was then never disabled, so
> +	 * there is no device state to restore on resume.
> +	 */
> +	data->suspend_wp = err < 0;
> +	if (data->suspend_wp) {
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "write protected, skipping state save (%d)\n", err);
> +		/* Still avoid bus traffic while suspended. */
> +		regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
>  	regcache_mark_dirty(regmap);
> 
> @@ -514,6 +532,10 @@ static int spd5118_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;
> 
>  	regcache_cache_only(regmap, false);
> +
> +	if (data->suspend_wp)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	return regcache_sync(regmap);
>  }
> 
> As far as I can tell this goes back to d1b4c755081a ("hwmon: (spd5118) Add
> suspend/resume support"), which first shipped in v6.11.
> 
> Thanks for taking a look, and no worries at all if this isn't useful.
> 
> Gabriel G

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 8/17/26 09:29, GG wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I apologize in advance if this isn't the right place to send this. I ran into
> a quirk on my own machine, went digging, and ended up working out what causes
> it, so I figured it was probably worth sharing. Please feel free to ignore all
> of this if it's not useful or doesn't apply.
> 
> Before you read any further, three things you should probably know:
> 
>    - I'm not a programmer. I can tell you what my hardware does, and I ran
>      every test below myself on it, but if you ask me to defend the actual
>      implementation I'll be out of my depth pretty quickly.
> 
>    - I worked this out with an AI coding assistant (Claude, claude-opus-5) over
>      a long back-and-forth debugging session. It suggested things to try and
>      wrote the instrumented test modules, and I built and ran each one on this
>      machine and fed the results back. It drafted this write-up too, and I've
>      edited it.
> 
>    - So this isn't a formal patch submission and there's deliberately no
>      Signed-off-by on it. Treat it as a bug report that happens to come with a
>      suggestion attached, and please feel free to bin the patch entirely and do
>      something completely different.
> 
> The one thing I can offer that might actually be worth something is the
> hardware. This machine reproduces the problem every single time, so I'm happy
> to test whatever you'd like, in whatever form.
> 
> Anyway, here's what I found.
> 
> spd5118_resume() fails with -ENXIO on every single suspend/resume cycle here,
> and I think it's because the SPD hubs on this board are write protected by the
> platform firmware.
> 
> Hardware:
>    Gigabyte Z790 AORUS PRO X, BIOS F11a
>    Intel i9-14900KS
>    2x 32GB DDR5, hubs at i2c 12-0051 and 12-0053
>    Both report: DDR5 temperature sensor: vendor 0x06:0x32 revision 1.6
>    Kernel 7.1.8 (CachyOS)
> 
> This shows up on every resume:
> 
>    spd5118 12-0051: Failed to write b = 0: -6
>    spd5118 12-0051: PM: dpm_run_callback(): spd5118_resume returns -6
>    spd5118 12-0051: PM: spd5118_resume returned -6 after 15085 usecs
>    spd5118 12-0051: PM: failed to resume async: error -6
> 
> The sensor itself works fine either side of a suspend and the configured
> limits survive, so nothing is actually broken for me as a user. It's just the
> error, plus 5-18ms of pointless failing SMBus traffic per DIMM every time.
> 
> The thing that finally made it click is that this has nothing to do with
> suspend or resume at all. These hubs refuse writes all the time. Writing
> temp1_max back to the exact value it already holds, on a fully booted and idle
> system, fails the same way:
> 
>    $ cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max
>    55000
>    $ sudo sh -c 'echo 55000 > /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon3/temp1_max'
>    sh: line 1: echo: write error: No such device or address
> 
> Reads are completely unaffected. During resume, raw i2c_smbus_read_byte_data()
> on MR11 and on every other register succeeds on the first try and returns
> sensible values. Every single i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() comes back -ENXIO.
> 
> Which means this, in spd5118_suspend():
> 
>    regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
>                       SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
> 
> is failing silently, because its return value isn't checked. The sensor never
> actually gets disabled. But the cache still gets marked dirty, so on resume
> regcache_sync() goes off to restore state that was never changed in the first
> place.
> 
> The error message itself sent me down the wrong path for quite a while. It
> doesn't come from the sync, it comes from regcache_sync()'s epilogue, which
> force-writes every regmap range selector and then hands that write's error
> back as its own return value. For spd5118 in I2C legacy mode that selector is
> MR11, which is also a cached writeable register, and with window_start 0 and
> window_len 0x100 it sits inside its own paging window. That's why the message
> singles out register 0xb, which had me convinced for ages that there was
> something specifically wrong with MR11.
> 
> Dead ends, in case it saves anyone else the time:
> 
>    - Dropping MR11 from the regcache before the sync does silence the "Failed
>      to write b = 0" message, but resume still fails, because the next register
>      isn't writeable either.
>    - MR11 already reads back as 0 on resume, so there's no stale page.
>    - Reads succeed on the first attempt, so the hub isn't slow to wake up.
>    - Polling for a write to be accepted for up to 2 seconds never got one
>      through, and added 3 seconds to resume.
>    - Pinning i2c-i801 to power/control=on for the whole cycle changes nothing.
>      The adapter isn't marked suspended at that point either:
>      __i2c_check_suspended() (drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h) returns -ESHUTDOWN and
>      emits a "Transfer while suspended" dev_WARN, and neither of those shows up
>      anywhere in my logs.
> 
> The patch below is what ended up working for me here: check whether the device
> actually accepted that suspend-time write, and if it didn't, don't bother
> marking the cache dirty or syncing on resume. With it applied, resume returns
> 0 in 0us and the error is gone. I ran 5 suspend/resume cycles on a fresh boot
> with no debug kernel options, and /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats went from
> success=0 failed_resume=0 to success=5 failed_resume=0, with temperatures and
> limits unaffected throughout.
> 
> One thing I can't check myself: I don't have any hardware with a hub that does
> accept writes, so I can't confirm the normal path still behaves properly on a
> machine like that.
> 
> Candidate change against drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c:
> 
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct spd5118_data {
>   	struct regmap *regmap;
>   	struct mutex nvmem_lock;
>   	bool is_16bit;
> +	bool suspend_wp;	/* device NAKed the suspend write: nothing to restore */
>   };
> 
> @@ -498,10 +499,27 @@ static int spd5118_suspend(struct device *dev)
>   		return err;
> 
>   	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, true);
> -	regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE,
> -			   SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
> +	err = regmap_update_bits(regmap, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG,
> +				 SPD5118_TS_DISABLE, SPD5118_TS_DISABLE);
>   	regcache_cache_bypass(regmap, false);
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Platform firmware may write protect the SPD hub after memory
> +	 * training, in which case the device serves reads but NAKs every write
> +	 * with -ENXIO. The temperature sensor was then never disabled, so
> +	 * there is no device state to restore on resume.
> +	 */
> +	data->suspend_wp = err < 0;
> +	if (data->suspend_wp) {
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "write protected, skipping state save (%d)\n", err);
> +		/* Still avoid bus traffic while suspended. */
> +		regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	regcache_cache_only(regmap, true);
>   	regcache_mark_dirty(regmap);
> 
> @@ -514,6 +532,10 @@ static int spd5118_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;
> 
>   	regcache_cache_only(regmap, false);
> +
> +	if (data->suspend_wp)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	return regcache_sync(regmap);
>   }
> 
> As far as I can tell this goes back to d1b4c755081a ("hwmon: (spd5118) Add
> suspend/resume support"), which first shipped in v6.11.
> 
> Thanks for taking a look, and no worries at all if this isn't useful.
> 

This isn't the only problem. NVMEM access does not work if the chip is write
protected, limits can not be set, and it is possible that the temperature
sensor data is not accessible anymore after a suspend/resume sequence.
The driver must be black-listed on affected systems.

There was supposed to be a patch series which would prevent the driver from
probing if the chip is write protected, but that needs to be determined
and reported by the I2C subsystem (or, more specifically, by the I2C controller)
and it was rejected. The driver could try to detect the write protect status
on its own by attempting a write, but that would be too risky.
So your only remedy is to black-list the driver.

Guenter

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
> Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last email. I've since
> found this from February, which is the same problem:
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/
> 
> And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
> 
>    i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
> 
> So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
> 

Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.

> One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has spd5118 refuse to
> probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me two working
> temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct temps,
> and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing that fails.
> 
> Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
> 

That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.

Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 compatible chips
requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are disabled, and
the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor data is not
accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have selected a
different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not trust
the status when the driver is loaded initially.

Guenter

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[GG]

Understood - thanks for explaining the page selection part, that makes sense. I'll blacklist it for now.

Appreciate you taking the time to get back to me on this!

Gabriel G

On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:58 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:

> On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
> > Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last email. I've since
> > found this from February, which is the same problem:
> >
> >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/
> >
> > And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
> >
> >    i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
> >
> > So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
> >
> 
> Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.
> 
> > One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has spd5118 refuse to
> > probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me two working
> > temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct temps,
> > and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing that fails.
> >
> > Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
> >
> 
> That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.
> 
> Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 compatible chips
> requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are disabled, and
> the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor data is not
> accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have selected a
> different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not trust
> the status when the driver is loaded initially.
> 
> Guenter
> 
>

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Armin Wolf]

Am 17.08.26 um 19:03 schrieb GG:

> Understood - thanks for explaining the page selection part, that makes sense. I'll blacklist it for now.
>
> Appreciate you taking the time to get back to me on this!
>
> Gabriel G
>
> On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:58 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
>>> Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last email. I've since
>>> found this from February, which is the same problem:
>>>
>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
>>>
>>>     i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
>>>
>>> So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
>>>
>> Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.

Yes, sadly the patch series adding support for this was abandoned :/

>>> One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has spd5118 refuse to
>>> probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me two working
>>> temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct temps,
>>> and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing that fails.
>>>
>>> Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
>>>
>> That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.
>>
>> Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 compatible chips
>> requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are disabled, and
>> the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor data is not
>> accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have selected a
>> different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not trust
>> the status when the driver is loaded initially.
>>
>> Guenter

Would it be enough if we always select page 0 inside spd5118_i2c_init(), thereby
preventing the driver from probing on hardware that does not allow us to write
the page select register?

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 8/17/26 16:02, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Am 17.08.26 um 19:03 schrieb GG:
> 
>> Understood - thanks for explaining the page selection part, that makes sense. I'll blacklist it for now.
>>
>> Appreciate you taking the time to get back to me on this!
>>
>> Gabriel G
>>
>> On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:58 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
>>>> Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last email. I've since
>>>> found this from February, which is the same problem:
>>>>
>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/
>>>>
>>>> And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
>>>>
>>>>     i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
>>>>
>>>> So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
>>>>
>>> Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.
> 
> Yes, sadly the patch series adding support for this was abandoned :/
> 

If I recall correctly, the important part (a I2C_AQ_SPD_WRITE_DISABLED flag
or similar provided by the I2C controller) was rejected.

>>>> One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has spd5118 refuse to
>>>> probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me two working
>>>> temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct temps,
>>>> and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing that fails.
>>>>
>>>> Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
>>>>
>>> That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.
>>>
>>> Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 compatible chips
>>> requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are disabled, and
>>> the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor data is not
>>> accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have selected a
>>> different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not trust
>>> the status when the driver is loaded initially.
>>>
>>> Guenter
> 
> Would it be enough if we always select page 0 inside spd5118_i2c_init(), thereby
> preventing the driver from probing on hardware that does not allow us to write
> the page select register?
> 

Looking into the code, it seems like the device may have been instantiated
through the detect path. That makes me wonder which distribution enables
CONFIG_SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT because it should _not_ be enabled by default.

Anyway, I guess I'll have to implement a dummy write operation in
spd5118_i2c_init() to check if writes are possible and bail out on error.
That is less than perfect but the best we can do without a flag from the
I2C controller.

I'll look into that after the commit window closes.

Thanks,
Guenter

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Armin Wolf]

Am 18.08.26 um 02:11 schrieb Guenter Roeck:

> On 8/17/26 16:02, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.08.26 um 19:03 schrieb GG:
>>
>>> Understood - thanks for explaining the page selection part, that 
>>> makes sense. I'll blacklist it for now.
>>>
>>> Appreciate you taking the time to get back to me on this!
>>>
>>> Gabriel G
>>>
>>> On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:58 PM, Guenter Roeck 
>>> <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
>>>>> Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my last 
>>>>> email. I've since
>>>>> found this from February, which is the same problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
>>>>>
>>>>>     i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
>>>>>
>>>>> So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
>>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.
>>
>> Yes, sadly the patch series adding support for this was abandoned :/
>>
>
> If I recall correctly, the important part (a I2C_AQ_SPD_WRITE_DISABLED 
> flag
> or similar provided by the I2C controller) was rejected. 

What? I seemed to have missed that important info. How frustrating.

>>>>> One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has 
>>>>> spd5118 refuse to
>>>>> probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me 
>>>>> two working
>>>>> temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get correct 
>>>>> temps,
>>>>> and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing 
>>>>> that fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
>>>>>
>>>> That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.
>>>>
>>>> Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 
>>>> compatible chips
>>>> requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are 
>>>> disabled, and
>>>> the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor data 
>>>> is not
>>>> accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have 
>>>> selected a
>>>> different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not 
>>>> trust
>>>> the status when the driver is loaded initially.
>>>>
>>>> Guenter
>>
>> Would it be enough if we always select page 0 inside 
>> spd5118_i2c_init(), thereby
>> preventing the driver from probing on hardware that does not allow us 
>> to write
>> the page select register?
>>
>
> Looking into the code, it seems like the device may have been 
> instantiated
> through the detect path. That makes me wonder which distribution enables
> CONFIG_SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT because it should _not_ be enabled by 
> default.
>
> Anyway, I guess I'll have to implement a dummy write operation in
> spd5118_i2c_init() to check if writes are possible and bail out on error.
> That is less than perfect but the best we can do without a flag from the
> I2C controller.
>
> I'll look into that after the commit window closes.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter

I already have prepared two patches for that, i will test them on my machine as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Armin Wolf]

Am 18.08.26 um 05:50 schrieb Armin Wolf:

> Am 18.08.26 um 02:11 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>
>> On 8/17/26 16:02, Armin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 17.08.26 um 19:03 schrieb GG:
>>>
>>>> Understood - thanks for explaining the page selection part, that 
>>>> makes sense. I'll blacklist it for now.
>>>>
>>>> Appreciate you taking the time to get back to me on this!
>>>>
>>>> Gabriel G
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, August 17th, 2026 at 12:58 PM, Guenter Roeck 
>>>> <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/17/26 09:42, GG wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry - I should have searched the archives before sending my 
>>>>>> last email. I've since
>>>>>> found this from February, which is the same problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20260205102942.28745-1-tinsaetadesse2015@gmail.com/ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I missed the obvious clue sitting in my own boot log:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: SPD Write Disable is set
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So my kernel already knew. Apologies for the noise.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the spd5118 driver.
>>>
>>> Yes, sadly the patch series adding support for this was abandoned :/
>>>
>>
>> If I recall correctly, the important part (a 
>> I2C_AQ_SPD_WRITE_DISABLED flag
>> or similar provided by the I2C controller) was rejected. 
>
> What? I seemed to have missed that important info. How frustrating.
>
>>>>>> One thing I'll mention in case it's useful: that series above has 
>>>>>> spd5118 refuse to
>>>>>> probe when writes are disabled. On my machine that would lose me 
>>>>>> two working
>>>>>> temperature sensors. Reads are completely fine here, I get 
>>>>>> correct temps,
>>>>>> and my temperature limits read back properly. It's only writing 
>>>>>> that fails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Happy to test anything on my hardware if it would help.
>>>>>>
>>>>> That can not be done, as I mentioned in my other e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Problem is that accessing temperature sensor data on spd5118 
>>>>> compatible chips
>>>>> requires a write to select the correct chip page. If writes are 
>>>>> disabled, and
>>>>> the BIOS selected a page other than page 0, temperature sensor 
>>>>> data is not
>>>>> accessible. Since the BIOS can do whatever it wants and may have 
>>>>> selected a
>>>>> different page after a suspend/resume sequence, one simply can not 
>>>>> trust
>>>>> the status when the driver is loaded initially.
>>>>>
>>>>> Guenter
>>>
>>> Would it be enough if we always select page 0 inside 
>>> spd5118_i2c_init(), thereby
>>> preventing the driver from probing on hardware that does not allow 
>>> us to write
>>> the page select register?
>>>
>>
>> Looking into the code, it seems like the device may have been 
>> instantiated
>> through the detect path. That makes me wonder which distribution enables
>> CONFIG_SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT because it should _not_ be enabled by 
>> default.
>>
>> Anyway, I guess I'll have to implement a dummy write operation in
>> spd5118_i2c_init() to check if writes are possible and bail out on 
>> error.
>> That is less than perfect but the best we can do without a flag from the
>> I2C controller.
>>
>> I'll look into that after the commit window closes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>
> I already have prepared two patches for that, i will test them on my 
> machine as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Armin Wolf 

Both patches seems to work, but i do not have an DDR5-based Intel system and hand. Still, do you want
me to send those patches when the new merge window opens?

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

Re: [BUG] hwmon: (spd5118) resume fails -ENXIO on write protected hubs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 8/17/26 22:00, Armin Wolf wrote:
...
>>>
>>> Looking into the code, it seems like the device may have been instantiated
>>> through the detect path. That makes me wonder which distribution enables
>>> CONFIG_SENSORS_SPD5118_DETECT because it should _not_ be enabled by default.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I guess I'll have to implement a dummy write operation in
>>> spd5118_i2c_init() to check if writes are possible and bail out on error.
>>> That is less than perfect but the best we can do without a flag from the
>>> I2C controller.
>>>
>>> I'll look into that after the commit window closes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Guenter
>>
>> I already have prepared two patches for that, i will test them on my machine as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Armin Wolf 
> 
> Both patches seems to work, but i do not have an DDR5-based Intel system and hand. Still, do you want
> me to send those patches when the new merge window opens?
> 

Please do. We should see a couple of patches applied to the spd5118 driver
during the commit window, adding I3C support, so please remember to rebase
your patches on top of v7.3-rc1 before you send them.

Thanks,
Guenter