* [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp
@ 2026-10-22 8:50 Abdul Wasey
2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 1/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows Abdul Wasey
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Matthieu Baerts, Mat Martineau, Geliang Tang, Paolo Abeni
With fullmesh endpoints, removing and re-adding the endpoint used by the
initial subflow never creates a new subflow from it: the closed initial
subflow stays in the conn_list, and makes the PM think the remote ID 0
is already used, or picks its reset remote address. If the initial
subflow was the only one, no address is left for the remote ID 0 at all.
Patch 1 fixes that, patch 2 adds tests for it.
Found with a router flapping one of its links: the link carrying the
initial subflow never rejoined the existing connections. Tested on top
of export-net: the new tests fail without patch 1, except the one adding
another endpoint, which already worked and guards against breaking it.
The whole mptcp_join.sh passes with patch 1. Patch 2 uses iptables like
the other tests there: when merged with net-next, it will need the same
conversion to nftables as the others.
Changes in v6, after the review of v5 by Sashiko on netdev:
- Patch 1: in the commit message, the closed initial subflow keeps its
remote address: only the destination port is zeroed, not the address.
- Patch 2: skip the "after reset" test if the iptables rule cannot be
added, instead of passing, and check that the reset closed the
subflow.
- Patch 2: in the two tests with the initial subflow alone, check it is
gone after the removal of its endpoint: the ESTABLISHED event comes
before the PM worker accounts that endpoint, so a removal right after
it can miss the subflow.
- v5: https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20261021070324.50533-1-w453y.me@gmail.com/
Changes in v5:
- Patch 1: when no subflow is left to take the remote ID 0 address from,
use the remote address of the MPTCP socket, as fill_remote_addr()
does. Without it, v4 also broke adding another endpoint after the
removal of the initial one, when it was the only subflow (Sashiko on
netdev).
- Patch 2: add two tests for the initial subflow alone: re-adding its
endpoint, and adding another endpoint.
- v4: https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20261019190558.465270-1-w453y.me@gmail.com/
Changes in v4:
- Patch 2: only check the joins when the iptables rule has been added
(Sashiko).
- v3: https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20261019185512.458313-1-w453y.me@gmail.com/
Changes in v3:
- Patch 2: use iptables instead of init_nftables(), which is only in
net-next (Sashiko).
- v2: https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20261019180306.382039-1-w453y.me@gmail.com/
Changes in v2:
- Patch 1: also skip the subflows in TCP_CLOSE: the initial subflow can
be disconnected and its context reset, clearing the 'closing' flag and
zeroing its remote address (Sashiko).
- Patch 2: validate this case too, by resetting the initial subflow
before removing its endpoint.
- v1: https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20261019170751.200446-1-w453y.me@gmail.com/
Abdul Wasey (2):
mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows
selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh
net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 33 ++++-
.../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-net v6 1/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows 2026-10-22 8:50 [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 8:50 ` Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 10:05 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp MPTCP CI 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Matthieu Baerts, Mat Martineau, Geliang Tang, Paolo Abeni, stable With fullmesh endpoints, if the endpoint used by the initial subflow is removed and then added back, no new subflow is created from it: the connection never uses this local address again. The initial subflow is kept in the conn_list once closed. If it was still established when closed, it keeps the local ID 0, which is also the ID used by the re-added endpoint, and fill_remote_addresses_fullmesh() then marks its remote ID as unavailable. If it was already in TCP_CLOSE, e.g. after a reset, it is disconnected and its context is reset: the 'closing' flag and the remote ID are cleared, and its destination port is zeroed. It is then picked as a remote address, with the port 0 and the ID 0, which also marks the remote ID 0 as unavailable. In both cases, when the peer has a single address, all subflows use the remote ID 0, and no valid remote address is left. Skip the subflows being closed or in TCP_CLOSE state, both when looking for the remote IDs already in use and when picking the remote addresses. __mptcp_subflow_active() cannot be used here: subflows still being established have to keep their remote ID marked as in use, to avoid creating duplicated subflows. When no subflow is left to take the remote ID 0 address from, e.g. when the initial subflow was the only one, use the remote address of the MPTCP socket, as fill_remote_addr() does for non-fullmesh endpoints. Before, re-adding the initial endpoint created no subflow in this case either, and another endpoint only worked by picking the closed initial subflow. Without the fullmesh flag, the remote address is taken from the MPTCP socket, so this issue is specific to fullmesh endpoints. Fixes: 045e9d812868 ("mptcp: fix duplicate subflow creation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Abdul Wasey <w453y.me@gmail.com> --- net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c index 1a7750813..c240c1056 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c @@ -199,6 +199,16 @@ fill_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *local, return 1; } +/* Closed subflows can stay in the conn_list, e.g. the initial one: their + * addresses and IDs are not reliable, possibly even reset. + */ +static bool mptcp_subflow_is_closed(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow) +{ + struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow); + + return subflow->closing || inet_sk_state_load(ssk) == TCP_CLOSE; +} + static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_fullmesh(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *local, @@ -216,11 +226,18 @@ fill_remote_addresses_fullmesh(struct mptcp_sock *msk, * already created by incoming ADD_ADDR */ bitmap_zero(unavail_id, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1); - mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) + mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) { + if (mptcp_subflow_is_closed(subflow)) + continue; + if (READ_ONCE(subflow->local_id) == local->id) __set_bit(subflow->remote_id, unavail_id); + } mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) { + if (mptcp_subflow_is_closed(subflow)) + continue; + ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow); mptcp_remote_address((struct sock_common *)ssk, &addrs[i]); addrs[i].id = READ_ONCE(subflow->remote_id); @@ -243,6 +260,20 @@ fill_remote_addresses_fullmesh(struct mptcp_sock *msk, break; } + /* The initial subflow can be closed: like fill_remote_addr(), use the + * remote address of the MPTCP socket for the remote ID 0. + */ + if (!deny_id0 && !test_bit(0, unavail_id) && i < addrs_size && + msk->pm.extra_subflows < limit_extra_subflows) { + struct mptcp_addr_info remote = { 0 }; + + mptcp_remote_address((struct sock_common *)sk, &remote); + if (mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, local, &remote)) { + addrs[i++] = remote; + msk->pm.extra_subflows++; + } + } + return i; } -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh 2026-10-22 8:50 [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 1/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 8:50 ` Abdul Wasey 2026-10-23 22:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 2026-10-22 10:05 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp MPTCP CI 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Matthieu Baerts, Mat Martineau, Geliang Tang, Paolo Abeni, stable The "delete and re-add" test validates the removal and the re-addition of the endpoint used by the initial subflow, but without the fullmesh flag. Do the same with the fullmesh flag: with a second subflow, after a reset of the initial subflow, and with the initial subflow only, then re-adding its endpoint or adding another one. Without the previous patch, no new subflow is created, except when adding another endpoint. The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID. Fixes: 045e9d812868 ("mptcp: fix duplicate subflow creation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Abdul Wasey <w453y.me@gmail.com> --- .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 117 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh index 18ce7136a..52031288b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh @@ -4445,6 +4445,123 @@ endpoint_tests() chk_rm_nr 4 4 fi + # remove and re-add the endpoint of the initial subflow, with fullmesh + if reset_with_events "delete and re-add, fullmesh" && + continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 0 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 id 2 dev ns2eth2 flags subflow,fullmesh + { timeout_test=120 test_linkfail=128 speed=5 \ + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 & } 2>/dev/null + local tests_pid=$! + + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_ESTABLISHED 1 + wait_mpj 1 + chk_subflow_nr "before delete id 0" 2 + + pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 1 10.0.1.2 + sleep 0.5 + chk_subflow_nr "after delete id 0" 1 + + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + wait_mpj 2 + chk_subflow_nr "after re-add id 0" 2 + + mptcp_lib_kill_group_wait $tests_pid + kill_events_pids + + chk_join_nr 2 2 2 + chk_rm_nr 1 1 + fi + + # same, but the initial subflow is reset before removing its endpoint + if reset_with_events "delete and re-add, fullmesh, after reset" && + continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 0 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 id 2 dev ns2eth2 flags subflow,fullmesh + { timeout_test=120 test_linkfail=128 speed=5 \ + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 & } 2>/dev/null + local tests_pid=$! + + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_ESTABLISHED 1 + wait_mpj 1 + chk_subflow_nr "before reset" 2 + + if ip netns exec "${ns1}" ${iptables} -A INPUT -s "10.0.1.2" \ + -p tcp --tcp-option 30 -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset; then + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED 1 + ip netns exec "${ns1}" ${iptables} -F INPUT + chk_evt_nr ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED 1 error 1 + + pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 1 10.0.1.2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + wait_mpj 2 + chk_mptcp_info subflows 2 subflows 2 + chk_join_nr 2 2 2 + else + mark_as_skipped "unable to set the filter rules" + fi + + mptcp_lib_kill_group_wait $tests_pid + kill_events_pids + fi + + # only the initial subflow: once its endpoint is removed, no live subflow + # is left to take the remote address from + if reset_with_events "delete and re-add, fullmesh, single subflow" && + continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 0 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + { timeout_test=120 test_linkfail=128 speed=5 \ + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 & } 2>/dev/null + local tests_pid=$! + + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_ESTABLISHED 1 + pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 1 10.0.1.2 + # the ESTABLISHED event comes before the PM worker accounts the + # initial subflow endpoint: check the subflow is really gone + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED 1 + chk_subflow_nr "after delete" 0 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + wait_mpj 1 + chk_mptcp_info subflows 1 subflows 1 + + mptcp_lib_kill_group_wait $tests_pid + kill_events_pids + + chk_join_nr 1 1 1 + fi + + # same, but another endpoint is added after the removal + if reset_with_events "delete and add another, fullmesh, single subflow" && + continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 0 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh + { timeout_test=120 test_linkfail=128 speed=5 \ + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 & } 2>/dev/null + local tests_pid=$! + + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_ESTABLISHED 1 + pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 1 10.0.1.2 + # the ESTABLISHED event comes before the PM worker accounts the + # initial subflow endpoint: check the subflow is really gone + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED 1 + chk_subflow_nr "after delete" 0 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 id 2 dev ns2eth2 flags subflow,fullmesh + wait_mpj 1 + chk_mptcp_info subflows 1 subflows 1 + + mptcp_lib_kill_group_wait $tests_pid + kill_events_pids + + chk_join_nr 1 1 1 + fi + # remove and re-add if reset_with_events "delete re-add signal" && continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-23 22:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: netdev-bot+sashiko @ 2026-10-23 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: w453y.me; +Cc: mptcp, matttbe, martineau, geliang, pabeni, stable, kuba Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider. Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 1 If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong. If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply (one such reply per series is enough). - [Medium] Two of the new tests, "delete and re-add, fullmesh, single subflow" and "delete and add another, fullmesh, single subflow"… - [Low] In "delete and re-add, fullmesh, single subflow" and "delete and add another, fullmesh, single subflow" (endpoint_tests() in… -- selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh This adds four cases to endpoint_tests() in mptcp_join.sh. Each one removes and re-adds the endpoint used by the initial subflow, with the fullmesh flag set. The cases are: with a second subflow, after a reset of the initial subflow, and with the initial subflow only (re-adding the same endpoint or adding another one). > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh > index 18ce7136a2b0e..52031288bcc86 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh > @@ -4445,6 +4445,123 @@ endpoint_tests() [ ... ] > + # only the initial subflow: once its endpoint is removed, no live subflow > + # is left to take the remote address from > + if reset_with_events "delete and re-add, fullmesh, single subflow" && > + continue_if mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then > + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 > + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 0 2 > + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh > + { timeout_test=120 test_linkfail=128 speed=5 \ > + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 & } 2>/dev/null > + local tests_pid=$! > + > + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_ESTABLISHED 1 > + pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 1 10.0.1.2 [Severity: Medium] Can this delete race with ns2's PM worker accounting the MPC endpoint? mptcp_pm_fully_established() only queues the PM work before it sends the ESTABLISHED event: net/mptcp/pm.c:mptcp_pm_fully_established() { ... if (READ_ONCE(pm->work_pending) && !(pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED))) mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED); ... if (announce) mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_ESTABLISHED, msk, ssk, GFP_ATOMIC); } msk->mpc_endpoint_id is set later, from the worker, in mptcp_mpc_endpoint_setup(). If the delete request is handled first, mpc_endpoint_id is still 0, so mptcp_endp_get_local_id() returns 1 instead of 0: return msk->mpc_endpoint_id == addr->id ? 0 : addr->id; As a result, mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr() asks to remove local id 1. mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow() then skips the initial subflow, which has local id 0: if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW && id != rm_id) continue; When the worker runs later, __lookup_addr() in mptcp_mpc_endpoint_setup() can no longer find the endpoint. MPTCP_PM_MPC_ENDPOINT_ACCOUNTED is set while mpc_endpoint_id is still 0, and the initial subflow stays alive. If that happens, does the SUB_CLOSED wait_event time out, and does chk_subflow_nr "after delete" 0 fail? After the re-add, the live initial subflow still holds remote id 0. No fullmesh subflow would be created, so wait_mpj, chk_mptcp_info and chk_join_nr would fail as well. The comment below shows this ordering is known. However, waiting for SUB_CLOSED only detects the race and does not prevent it. Could the test wait until the MPC endpoint has been accounted before it deletes the endpoint? "delete and add another, fullmesh, single subflow" has the same pattern. The two-subflow variants look fine: wait_mpj 1 only succeeds after the same worker run has done the accounting. > + # the ESTABLISHED event comes before the PM worker accounts the > + # initial subflow endpoint: check the subflow is really gone > + wait_event ns2 MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED 1 > + chk_subflow_nr "after delete" 0 [Severity: Low] Does a SUB_CLOSED event on ns2 guarantee that ss reports 0 subflows in both namespaces at this point? mptcp_close_ssk() sends the event before teardown starts: if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_SUB_CLOSED, mptcp_sk(sk), ssk, GFP_KERNEL); ... __mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow, MPTCP_CF_PUSH); For msk->first, __mptcp_subflow_disconnect() only does: } else { tcp_shutdown(ssk, SEND_SHUTDOWN); } ns2's subflow can therefore sit in FIN_WAIT1/FIN_WAIT2, and ss still lists it until ns1 sends its FIN. ns1 closes its side asynchronously, once its PM worker has handled the RM_ADDR id 0. chk_subflow_nr() counts the sockets once, with no retry: cnt1=$(ss -N $ns1 -tOni | grep -c token) cnt2=$(ss -N $ns2 -tOni | grep -c token) The other tests in endpoint_tests() run sleep 0.5 before this check, and so does the new "delete and re-add, fullmesh" test. Could the single-subflow variants fail spuriously without that delay? "delete and add another, fullmesh, single subflow" has the same pattern. > + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 id 1 dev ns2eth1 flags subflow,fullmesh > + wait_mpj 1 > + chk_mptcp_info subflows 1 subflows 1 [ ... ] -- Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261022085041.211318-1-w453y.me%40gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp 2026-10-22 8:50 [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 1/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh Abdul Wasey @ 2026-10-22 10:05 ` MPTCP CI 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: MPTCP CI @ 2026-10-22 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Abdul Wasey; +Cc: mptcp Hi Abdul, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join ⚠️ - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join ⚠️ - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅ - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅ - Perf: Unstable ⚠️ - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/39753130001 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/59bcbcbc036a Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1191124 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-23 22:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-10-22 8:50 [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 1/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: skip closed subflows Abdul Wasey 2026-10-22 8:50 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: re-add the initial subflow endp with fullmesh Abdul Wasey 2026-10-23 22:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko 2026-10-22 10:05 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v6 0/2] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: fullmesh: re-add of the initial subflow endp MPTCP CI
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.