All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity
       [not found] <20250210075703.79125-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
@ 2025-02-10  7:57 ` Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work Gabriele Monaco
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gabriele Monaco @ 2025-02-10  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Desnoyers, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
	linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Marco Elver, Ingo Molnar, Gabriele Monaco

From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

When a process reduces its number of threads or clears bits in its CPU
affinity mask, the mm_cid allocation should eventually converge towards
smaller values.

However, the change introduced by:

commit 7e019dcc470f ("sched: Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency
IDs for intermittent workloads")

adds a per-mm/CPU recent_cid which is never unset unless a thread
migrates.

This is a tradeoff between:

A) Preserving cache locality after a transition from many threads to few
   threads, or after reducing the hamming weight of the allowed CPU mask.

B) Making the mm_cid upper bounds wrt nr threads and allowed CPU mask
   easy to document and understand.

C) Allowing applications to eventually react to mm_cid compaction after
   reduction of the nr threads or allowed CPU mask, making the tracking
   of mm_cid compaction easier by shrinking it back towards 0 or not.

D) Making sure applications that periodically reduce and then increase
   again the nr threads or allowed CPU mask still benefit from good
   cache locality with mm_cid.

Introduce the following changes:

* After shrinking the number of threads or reducing the number of
  allowed CPUs, reduce the value of max_nr_cid so expansion of CID
  allocation will preserve cache locality if the number of threads or
  allowed CPUs increase again.

* Only re-use a recent_cid if it is within the max_nr_cid upper bound,
  else find the first available CID.

Fixes: 7e019dcc470f ("sched: Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency IDs for intermittent workloads")
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h |  7 ++++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h     | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 6b27db7f94963..0234f14f2aa6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -875,10 +875,11 @@ struct mm_struct {
 		 */
 		unsigned int nr_cpus_allowed;
 		/**
-		 * @max_nr_cid: Maximum number of concurrency IDs allocated.
+		 * @max_nr_cid: Maximum number of allowed concurrency
+		 *              IDs allocated.
 		 *
-		 * Track the highest number of concurrency IDs allocated for the
-		 * mm.
+		 * Track the highest number of allowed concurrency IDs
+		 * allocated for the mm.
 		 */
 		atomic_t max_nr_cid;
 		/**
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 38e0e323dda26..606c96b74ebfa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3698,10 +3698,28 @@ static inline int __mm_cid_try_get(struct task_struct *t, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	struct cpumask *cidmask = mm_cidmask(mm);
 	struct mm_cid __percpu *pcpu_cid = mm->pcpu_cid;
-	int cid = __this_cpu_read(pcpu_cid->recent_cid);
+	int cid, max_nr_cid, allowed_max_nr_cid;
 
+	/*
+	 * After shrinking the number of threads or reducing the number
+	 * of allowed cpus, reduce the value of max_nr_cid so expansion
+	 * of cid allocation will preserve cache locality if the number
+	 * of threads or allowed cpus increase again.
+	 */
+	max_nr_cid = atomic_read(&mm->max_nr_cid);
+	while ((allowed_max_nr_cid = min_t(int, READ_ONCE(mm->nr_cpus_allowed),
+					   atomic_read(&mm->mm_users))),
+	       max_nr_cid > allowed_max_nr_cid) {
+		/* atomic_try_cmpxchg loads previous mm->max_nr_cid into max_nr_cid. */
+		if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mm->max_nr_cid, &max_nr_cid, allowed_max_nr_cid)) {
+			max_nr_cid = allowed_max_nr_cid;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 	/* Try to re-use recent cid. This improves cache locality. */
-	if (!mm_cid_is_unset(cid) && !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cid, cidmask))
+	cid = __this_cpu_read(pcpu_cid->recent_cid);
+	if (!mm_cid_is_unset(cid) && cid < max_nr_cid &&
+	    !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cid, cidmask))
 		return cid;
 	/*
 	 * Expand cid allocation if the maximum number of concurrency
@@ -3709,8 +3727,9 @@ static inline int __mm_cid_try_get(struct task_struct *t, struct mm_struct *mm)
 	 * and number of threads. Expanding cid allocation as much as
 	 * possible improves cache locality.
 	 */
-	cid = atomic_read(&mm->max_nr_cid);
+	cid = max_nr_cid;
 	while (cid < READ_ONCE(mm->nr_cpus_allowed) && cid < atomic_read(&mm->mm_users)) {
+		/* atomic_try_cmpxchg loads previous mm->max_nr_cid into cid. */
 		if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mm->max_nr_cid, &cid, cid + 1))
 			continue;
 		if (!cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cid, cidmask))
-- 
2.48.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work
       [not found] <20250210075703.79125-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity Gabriele Monaco
@ 2025-02-10  7:57 ` Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-10 14:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability Mathieu Desnoyers
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gabriele Monaco @ 2025-02-10  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Desnoyers, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
	linux-mm, linux-kernel
  Cc: Gabriele Monaco

Currently, the task_mm_cid_work function is called in a task work
triggered by a scheduler tick to frequently compact the mm_cids of each
process. This can delay the execution of the corresponding thread for
the entire duration of the function, negatively affecting the response
in case of real time tasks. In practice, we observe task_mm_cid_work
increasing the latency of 30-35us on a 128 cores system, this order of
magnitude is meaningful under PREEMPT_RT.

Run the task_mm_cid_work in a new delayed work connected to the
mm_struct rather than in the task context before returning to
userspace.

This delayed work is initialised while allocating the mm and disabled
before freeing it, its execution is no longer triggered by scheduler
ticks but run periodically based on the defined MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY.

The main advantage of this change is that the function can be offloaded
to a different CPU and even preempted by RT tasks.

Moreover, this new behaviour could be more predictable with periodic
tasks with short runtime, which may rarely run during a scheduler tick.
Now, the work is always scheduled with the same periodicity for each mm
(though the periodicity is not guaranteed due to interference from other
tasks, but mm_cid compaction is mostly best effort).

To avoid excessively increased runtime, we quickly return from the
function if we have no work to be done (i.e. no mm_cid is allocated).
This is helpful for tasks that sleep for a long time, but also for
terminated task. We are no longer following the process' state, hence
the function continues to run after a process terminates but before its
mm is freed.

Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 16 ++++++----
 include/linux/sched.h    |  1 -
 kernel/sched/core.c      | 66 +++++-----------------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h     |  7 -----
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 0234f14f2aa6b..3aeadb519cac5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -861,12 +861,6 @@ struct mm_struct {
 		 * runqueue locks.
 		 */
 		struct mm_cid __percpu *pcpu_cid;
-		/*
-		 * @mm_cid_next_scan: Next mm_cid scan (in jiffies).
-		 *
-		 * When the next mm_cid scan is due (in jiffies).
-		 */
-		unsigned long mm_cid_next_scan;
 		/**
 		 * @nr_cpus_allowed: Number of CPUs allowed for mm.
 		 *
@@ -889,6 +883,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
 		 * mm nr_cpus_allowed updates.
 		 */
 		raw_spinlock_t cpus_allowed_lock;
+		struct delayed_work mm_cid_work;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 		atomic_long_t pgtables_bytes;	/* size of all page tables */
@@ -1180,11 +1175,16 @@ static inline void vma_iter_init(struct vma_iterator *vmi,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
 
+#define SCHED_MM_CID_PERIOD_NS	(100ULL * 1000000)	/* 100ms */
+#define MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY	100			/* 100ms */
+
 enum mm_cid_state {
 	MM_CID_UNSET = -1U,		/* Unset state has lazy_put flag set. */
 	MM_CID_LAZY_PUT = (1U << 31),
 };
 
+extern void task_mm_cid_work(struct work_struct *work);
+
 static inline bool mm_cid_is_unset(int cid)
 {
 	return cid == MM_CID_UNSET;
@@ -1257,12 +1257,16 @@ static inline int mm_alloc_cid_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *
 	if (!mm->pcpu_cid)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	mm_init_cid(mm, p);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mm->mm_cid_work, task_mm_cid_work);
+	schedule_delayed_work(&mm->mm_cid_work,
+			      msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY));
 	return 0;
 }
 #define mm_alloc_cid(...)	alloc_hooks(mm_alloc_cid_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
 
 static inline void mm_destroy_cid(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	disable_delayed_work_sync(&mm->mm_cid_work);
 	free_percpu(mm->pcpu_cid);
 	mm->pcpu_cid = NULL;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 9632e3318e0d6..515b15f946cac 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1397,7 +1397,6 @@ struct task_struct {
 	int				last_mm_cid;	/* Most recent cid in mm */
 	int				migrate_from_cpu;
 	int				mm_cid_active;	/* Whether cid bitmap is active */
-	struct callback_head		cid_work;
 #endif
 
 	struct tlbflush_unmap_batch	tlb_ubc;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 165c90ba64ea9..c65003ab8c55b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4524,7 +4524,6 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
 	p->wake_entry.u_flags = CSD_TYPE_TTWU;
 	p->migration_pending = NULL;
 #endif
-	init_sched_mm_cid(p);
 }
 
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_numa_balancing);
@@ -5662,7 +5661,6 @@ void sched_tick(void)
 		resched_latency = cpu_resched_latency(rq);
 	calc_global_load_tick(rq);
 	sched_core_tick(rq);
-	task_tick_mm_cid(rq, donor);
 	scx_tick(rq);
 
 	rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
@@ -10528,38 +10526,17 @@ static void sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu,
 	sched_mm_cid_remote_clear(mm, pcpu_cid, cpu);
 }
 
-static void task_mm_cid_work(struct callback_head *work)
+void task_mm_cid_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	unsigned long now = jiffies, old_scan, next_scan;
-	struct task_struct *t = current;
 	struct cpumask *cidmask;
-	struct mm_struct *mm;
+	struct delayed_work *delayed_work = container_of(work, struct delayed_work, work);
+	struct mm_struct *mm = container_of(delayed_work, struct mm_struct, mm_cid_work);
 	int weight, cpu;
 
-	SCHED_WARN_ON(t != container_of(work, struct task_struct, cid_work));
-
-	work->next = work;	/* Prevent double-add */
-	if (t->flags & PF_EXITING)
-		return;
-	mm = t->mm;
-	if (!mm)
-		return;
-	old_scan = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_next_scan);
-	next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
-	if (!old_scan) {
-		unsigned long res;
-
-		res = cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, old_scan, next_scan);
-		if (res != old_scan)
-			old_scan = res;
-		else
-			old_scan = next_scan;
-	}
-	if (time_before(now, old_scan))
-		return;
-	if (!try_cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, &old_scan, next_scan))
-		return;
 	cidmask = mm_cidmask(mm);
+	/* Nothing to clear for now */
+	if (cpumask_empty(cidmask))
+		goto out;
 	/* Clear cids that were not recently used. */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
 		sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_old(mm, cpu);
@@ -10570,35 +10547,8 @@ static void task_mm_cid_work(struct callback_head *work)
 	 */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
 		sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(mm, cpu, weight);
-}
-
-void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t)
-{
-	struct mm_struct *mm = t->mm;
-	int mm_users = 0;
-
-	if (mm) {
-		mm_users = atomic_read(&mm->mm_users);
-		if (mm_users == 1)
-			mm->mm_cid_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
-	}
-	t->cid_work.next = &t->cid_work;	/* Protect against double add */
-	init_task_work(&t->cid_work, task_mm_cid_work);
-}
-
-void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
-{
-	struct callback_head *work = &curr->cid_work;
-	unsigned long now = jiffies;
-
-	if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & (PF_EXITING | PF_KTHREAD)) ||
-	    work->next != work)
-		return;
-	if (time_before(now, READ_ONCE(curr->mm->mm_cid_next_scan)))
-		return;
-
-	/* No page allocation under rq lock */
-	task_work_add(curr, work, TWA_RESUME);
+out:
+	schedule_delayed_work(delayed_work, msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY));
 }
 
 void sched_mm_cid_exit_signals(struct task_struct *t)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 606c96b74ebfa..fc613d9090bed 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3622,16 +3622,11 @@ extern void sched_dynamic_update(int mode);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
 
-#define SCHED_MM_CID_PERIOD_NS	(100ULL * 1000000)	/* 100ms */
-#define MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY	100			/* 100ms */
-
 extern raw_spinlock_t cid_lock;
 extern int use_cid_lock;
 
 extern void sched_mm_cid_migrate_from(struct task_struct *t);
 extern void sched_mm_cid_migrate_to(struct rq *dst_rq, struct task_struct *t);
-extern void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr);
-extern void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t);
 
 static inline void __mm_cid_put(struct mm_struct *mm, int cid)
 {
@@ -3899,8 +3894,6 @@ static inline void switch_mm_cid(struct rq *rq,
 static inline void switch_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next) { }
 static inline void sched_mm_cid_migrate_from(struct task_struct *t) { }
 static inline void sched_mm_cid_migrate_to(struct rq *dst_rq, struct task_struct *t) { }
-static inline void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) { }
-static inline void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t) { }
 #endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
 
 extern u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
-- 
2.48.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
       [not found] <20250210075703.79125-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work Gabriele Monaco
@ 2025-02-10  7:57 ` Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-10 14:53   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  2025-02-10 14:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability Mathieu Desnoyers
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gabriele Monaco @ 2025-02-10  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Desnoyers, Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Shuah Khan,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Gabriele Monaco

A task in the kernel (task_mm_cid_work) runs somewhat periodically to
compact the mm_cid for each process. Add a test to validate that it runs
correctly and timely.

The test spawns 1 thread pinned to each CPU, then each thread, including
the main one, runs in short bursts for some time. During this period, the
mm_cids should be spanning all numbers between 0 and nproc.

At the end of this phase, a thread with high enough mm_cid (>= nproc/2)
is selected to be the new leader, all other threads terminate.

After some time, the only running thread should see 0 as mm_cid, if that
doesn't happen, the compaction mechanism didn't work and the test fails.

The test never fails if only 1 core is available, in which case, we
cannot test anything as the only available mm_cid is 0.

To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore       |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile         |   2 +-
 .../selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c   | 200 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore
index 16496de5f6ce4..2c89f97e4f737 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ basic_percpu_ops_test
 basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
 basic_test
 basic_rseq_op_test
+mm_cid_compaction_test
 param_test
 param_test_benchmark
 param_test_compare_twice
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
index 5a3432fceb586..ce1b38f46a355 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ OVERRIDE_TARGETS = 1
 
 TEST_GEN_PROGS = basic_test basic_percpu_ops_test basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test param_test \
 		param_test_benchmark param_test_compare_twice param_test_mm_cid \
-		param_test_mm_cid_benchmark param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
+		param_test_mm_cid_benchmark param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice mm_cid_compaction_test
 
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = librseq.so
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..701719b320049
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+
+#include "../kselftest.h"
+#include "rseq.h"
+
+#define VERBOSE 0
+#define printf_verbose(fmt, ...)                    \
+	do {                                        \
+		if (VERBOSE)                        \
+			printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+	} while (0)
+
+/* 0.5 s */
+#define RUNNER_PERIOD 500000
+/* Number of runs before we terminate or get the token */
+#define THREAD_RUNS 5
+
+/*
+ * Number of times we check that the mm_cid were compacted.
+ * Checks are repeated every RUNNER_PERIOD.
+ */
+#define MM_CID_COMPACT_TIMEOUT 10
+
+struct thread_args {
+	int cpu;
+	int num_cpus;
+	pthread_mutex_t *token;
+	pthread_barrier_t *barrier;
+	pthread_t *tinfo;
+	struct thread_args *args_head;
+};
+
+static void __noreturn *thread_runner(void *arg)
+{
+	struct thread_args *args = arg;
+	int i, ret, curr_mm_cid;
+	cpu_set_t cpumask;
+
+	CPU_ZERO(&cpumask);
+	CPU_SET(args->cpu, &cpumask);
+	ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(cpumask), &cpumask);
+	if (ret) {
+		errno = ret;
+		perror("Error: failed to set affinity");
+		abort();
+	}
+	pthread_barrier_wait(args->barrier);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < THREAD_RUNS; i++)
+		usleep(RUNNER_PERIOD);
+	curr_mm_cid = rseq_current_mm_cid();
+	/*
+	 * We select one thread with high enough mm_cid to be the new leader
+	 * all other threads (including the main thread) will terminate.
+	 * After some time, the mm_cid of the only remaining thread should
+	 * converge to 0, if not, the test fails.
+	 */
+	if (curr_mm_cid >= args->num_cpus / 2 &&
+	    !pthread_mutex_trylock(args->token)) {
+		printf_verbose(
+			"cpu%d has mm_cid=%d and will be the new leader.\n",
+			sched_getcpu(), curr_mm_cid);
+		for (i = 0; i < args->num_cpus; i++) {
+			if (args->tinfo[i] == pthread_self())
+				continue;
+			ret = pthread_join(args->tinfo[i], NULL);
+			if (ret) {
+				errno = ret;
+				perror("Error: failed to join thread");
+				abort();
+			}
+		}
+		pthread_barrier_destroy(args->barrier);
+		free(args->tinfo);
+		free(args->token);
+		free(args->barrier);
+		free(args->args_head);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < MM_CID_COMPACT_TIMEOUT; i++) {
+			curr_mm_cid = rseq_current_mm_cid();
+			printf_verbose("run %d: mm_cid=%d on cpu%d.\n", i,
+				       curr_mm_cid, sched_getcpu());
+			if (curr_mm_cid == 0)
+				exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
+			usleep(RUNNER_PERIOD);
+		}
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+	printf_verbose("cpu%d has mm_cid=%d and is going to terminate.\n",
+		       sched_getcpu(), curr_mm_cid);
+	pthread_exit(NULL);
+}
+
+int test_mm_cid_compaction(void)
+{
+	cpu_set_t affinity;
+	int i, j, ret = 0, num_threads;
+	pthread_t *tinfo;
+	pthread_mutex_t *token;
+	pthread_barrier_t *barrier;
+	struct thread_args *args;
+
+	sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(affinity), &affinity);
+	num_threads = CPU_COUNT(&affinity);
+	tinfo = calloc(num_threads, sizeof(*tinfo));
+	if (!tinfo) {
+		perror("Error: failed to allocate tinfo");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	args = calloc(num_threads, sizeof(*args));
+	if (!args) {
+		perror("Error: failed to allocate args");
+		ret = -1;
+		goto out_free_tinfo;
+	}
+	token = malloc(sizeof(*token));
+	if (!token) {
+		perror("Error: failed to allocate token");
+		ret = -1;
+		goto out_free_args;
+	}
+	barrier = malloc(sizeof(*barrier));
+	if (!barrier) {
+		perror("Error: failed to allocate barrier");
+		ret = -1;
+		goto out_free_token;
+	}
+	if (num_threads == 1) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Cannot test on a single cpu. "
+				"Skipping mm_cid_compaction test.\n");
+		/* only skipping the test, this is not a failure */
+		goto out_free_barrier;
+	}
+	pthread_mutex_init(token, NULL);
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(barrier, NULL, num_threads);
+	if (ret) {
+		errno = ret;
+		perror("Error: failed to initialise barrier");
+		goto out_free_barrier;
+	}
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE && j < num_threads; i++) {
+		if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &affinity))
+			continue;
+		args[j].num_cpus = num_threads;
+		args[j].tinfo = tinfo;
+		args[j].token = token;
+		args[j].barrier = barrier;
+		args[j].cpu = i;
+		args[j].args_head = args;
+		if (!j) {
+			/* The first thread is the main one */
+			tinfo[0] = pthread_self();
+			++j;
+			continue;
+		}
+		ret = pthread_create(&tinfo[j], NULL, thread_runner, &args[j]);
+		if (ret) {
+			errno = ret;
+			perror("Error: failed to create thread");
+			abort();
+		}
+		++j;
+	}
+	printf_verbose("Started %d threads.\n", num_threads);
+
+	/* Also main thread will terminate if it is not selected as leader */
+	thread_runner(&args[0]);
+
+	/* only reached in case of errors */
+out_free_barrier:
+	free(barrier);
+out_free_token:
+	free(token);
+out_free_args:
+	free(args);
+out_free_tinfo:
+	free(tinfo);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	if (!rseq_mm_cid_available()) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_mm_cid unavailable\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	if (test_mm_cid_compaction())
+		return -1;
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.48.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction Gabriele Monaco
@ 2025-02-10 14:53   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  2025-02-10 15:25     ` Gabriele Monaco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2025-02-10 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gabriele Monaco, Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Shuah Khan,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest

On 2025-02-10 08:57, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> A task in the kernel (task_mm_cid_work) runs somewhat periodically to
> compact the mm_cid for each process. Add a test to validate that it runs
> correctly and timely.
> 
> The test spawns 1 thread pinned to each CPU, then each thread, including
> the main one, runs in short bursts for some time. During this period, the
> mm_cids should be spanning all numbers between 0 and nproc.
> 
> At the end of this phase, a thread with high enough mm_cid (>= nproc/2)
> is selected to be the new leader, all other threads terminate.
> 
> After some time, the only running thread should see 0 as mm_cid, if that
> doesn't happen, the compaction mechanism didn't work and the test fails.
> 
> The test never fails if only 1 core is available, in which case, we
> cannot test anything as the only available mm_cid is 0.
> 
> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

tiny nit below:

> +		usleep(RUNNER_PERIOD);
> +	curr_mm_cid = rseq_current_mm_cid();
> +	/*
> +	 * We select one thread with high enough mm_cid to be the new leader

Missing punctuation here (...new leader.  All other...)

> +	 * all other threads (including the main thread) will terminate.
> +	 * After some time, the mm_cid of the only remaining thread should
> +	 * converge to 0, if not, the test fails.
> +	 */

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability
       [not found] <20250210075703.79125-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction Gabriele Monaco
@ 2025-02-10 14:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2025-02-10 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gabriele Monaco, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Marco Elver, Andrew Morton

[ Please make sure to CC everyone for patch 0/3 next time. Added CCs. ]

On 2025-02-10 08:56, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> This patchset moves the task_mm_cid_work to a preemptible and migratable
> context. This reduces the impact of this task to the scheduling latency
> of real time tasks.
> The change makes the recurrence of the task a bit more predictable.
> We also add optimisation and fixes to make sure the task_mm_cid_work
> works as intended.
> 
> The behaviour causing latency was introduced in commit 223baf9d17f2
> ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid") which
> introduced a task work tied to the scheduler tick.
> That approach presents two possible issues:
> * the task work runs before returning to user and causes, in fact, a
>    scheduling latency (with order of magnitude significant in PREEMPT_RT)
> * periodic tasks with short runtime are less likely to run during the
>    tick, hence they might not run the task work at all
> 
> Patch 1 allows the mm_cids to be actually compacted when a process
> reduces its number of threads, which was not the case since the same
> mm_cids were reused to improve cache locality, more details in [4].
> 
> Patch 2 contains the main changes, removing the task_work on the
> scheduler tick and using a delayed_work instead.
> Additionally, we terminate the call immediately if we see that no mm_cid
> is actually active, which could happen on processes sleeping for long
> time or which exited but whose mm has not been freed yet.
> 
> Patch 3 adds a selftest to validate the functionality of the
> task_mm_cid_work (i.e. to compact the mm_cids). The test fails if patch
> 1 is not applied and is flaky without patch 2. We expect it to always
> pass with the entire patchset applied.

There is a tiny nit in a comment in patch 3. Other than that the
series looks good. Please re-send with this fixed and please add
my reviewed by tag to patch 3.  Once updated, Peter, Ingo, you have my
blessing to pull this into tip.

Thanks!

Mathieu

> 
> Changes since V4 [1]:
> * Fixes on the selftest
>      * Polished memory allocation and cleanup
>      * Handle the test failure in main
> 
> Changes since V3 [2]:
> * Fixes on the selftest
>      * Minor style issues in comments and indentation
>      * Use of perror where possible
>      * Add a barrier to align threads execution
>      * Improve test failure and error handling
> 
> Changes since V2 [3]:
> * Change the order of the patches
> * Merge patches changing the main delayed_work logic
> * Improved self-test to spawn 1 less thread and use the main one instead
> 
> Changes since V1 [4]:
> * Re-arm the delayed_work at each invocation
> * Cancel the work synchronously at mmdrop
> * Remove next scan fields and completely rely on the delayed_work
> * Shrink mm_cid allocation with nr thread/affinity (Mathieu Desnoyers)
> * Add self test
> 
> Overhead comparison in [4]
> 
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250113074231.61638-4-gmonaco@redhat.com
> [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241216130909.240042-1-gmonaco@redhat.com
> [3] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241213095407.271357-1-gmonaco@redhat.com
> [4] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241205083110.180134-2-gmonaco@redhat.com
> 
> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> 
> Gabriele Monaco (2):
>    sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work
>    rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
> 
> Mathieu Desnoyers (1):
>    sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity
> 
>   include/linux/mm_types.h                      |  23 +-
>   include/linux/sched.h                         |   1 -
>   kernel/sched/core.c                           |  66 +-----
>   kernel/sched/sched.h                          |  32 ++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore       |   1 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile         |   2 +-
>   .../selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c   | 200 ++++++++++++++++++
>   7 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/mm_cid_compaction_test.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: a64dcfb451e254085a7daee5fe51bf22959d52d3


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
  2025-02-10 14:53   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
@ 2025-02-10 15:25     ` Gabriele Monaco
  2025-02-18 23:45       ` Shuah Khan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gabriele Monaco @ 2025-02-10 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mathieu Desnoyers
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Shuah Khan, Ingo Molnar,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest



On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On 2025-02-10 08:57, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > A task in the kernel (task_mm_cid_work) runs somewhat periodically
> > to
> > compact the mm_cid for each process. Add a test to validate that it
> > runs
> > correctly and timely.
> > 
> > The test spawns 1 thread pinned to each CPU, then each thread,
> > including
> > the main one, runs in short bursts for some time. During this
> > period, the
> > mm_cids should be spanning all numbers between 0 and nproc.
> > 
> > At the end of this phase, a thread with high enough mm_cid (>=
> > nproc/2)
> > is selected to be the new leader, all other threads terminate.
> > 
> > After some time, the only running thread should see 0 as mm_cid, if
> > that
> > doesn't happen, the compaction mechanism didn't work and the test
> > fails.
> > 
> > The test never fails if only 1 core is available, in which case, we
> > cannot test anything as the only available mm_cid is 0.
> > 
> > To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> 
> tiny nit below:
> 
> > +		usleep(RUNNER_PERIOD);
> > +	curr_mm_cid = rseq_current_mm_cid();
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We select one thread with high enough mm_cid to be the
> > new leader
> 
> Missing punctuation here (...new leader.  All other...)

I guess I'm allergic to those ;) Thanks for finding it!
I wonder if checkpatch should be able to catch this kind of problem,
but that's for another day.

Do I need to send a v6 for this or just reply here with the fixed
patch?

Thanks,
Gabriele


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
  2025-02-10 15:25     ` Gabriele Monaco
@ 2025-02-18 23:45       ` Shuah Khan
  2025-02-19 10:28         ` Gabriele Monaco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-02-18 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gabriele Monaco, Mathieu Desnoyers
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Shuah Khan, Ingo Molnar,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Shuah Khan

On 2/10/25 08:25, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> On 2025-02-10 08:57, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
>>> A task in the kernel (task_mm_cid_work) runs somewhat periodically
>>> to
>>> compact the mm_cid for each process. Add a test to validate that it
>>> runs
>>> correctly and timely.
>>>
>>> The test spawns 1 thread pinned to each CPU, then each thread,
>>> including
>>> the main one, runs in short bursts for some time. During this
>>> period, the
>>> mm_cids should be spanning all numbers between 0 and nproc.
>>>
>>> At the end of this phase, a thread with high enough mm_cid (>=
>>> nproc/2)
>>> is selected to be the new leader, all other threads terminate.
>>>
>>> After some time, the only running thread should see 0 as mm_cid, if
>>> that
>>> doesn't happen, the compaction mechanism didn't work and the test
>>> fails.
>>>
>>> The test never fails if only 1 core is available, in which case, we
>>> cannot test anything as the only available mm_cid is 0.
>>>
>>> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>>
>> tiny nit below:
>>
>>> +		usleep(RUNNER_PERIOD);
>>> +	curr_mm_cid = rseq_current_mm_cid();
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * We select one thread with high enough mm_cid to be the
>>> new leader
>>
>> Missing punctuation here (...new leader.  All other...)
> 
> I guess I'm allergic to those ;) Thanks for finding it!
> I wonder if checkpatch should be able to catch this kind of problem,
> but that's for another day.
> 
> Do I need to send a v6 for this or just reply here with the fixed
> patch?

Please send v6 with the suggested changes. Also change the commit
summary to

"selftests/rseq"

thanks,
-- Shuah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction
  2025-02-18 23:45       ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-02-19 10:28         ` Gabriele Monaco
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gabriele Monaco @ 2025-02-19 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shuah Khan, Mathieu Desnoyers
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Shuah Khan, Ingo Molnar,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest

On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 16:45 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> 
> Please send v6 with the suggested changes. Also change the commit
> summary to
> 
> "selftests/rseq"

Sure, will do. There was actually a V6 already, so I'm sending a V7.

In the meanwhile there was a discussion about the approach. I'm going
to send as V7 what is closer to the approach in V6.
I opened another series for the other approach (scan in batches), which
we may continue depending on the review of V7.

The test should be mostly independent on the approach though.

Thanks,
Gabriele


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-19 10:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20250210075703.79125-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs with reduced threads and affinity Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm delayed work Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rseq/selftests: Add test for mm_cid compaction Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10 14:53   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-10 15:25     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-18 23:45       ` Shuah Khan
2025-02-19 10:28         ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-02-10 14:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] sched: Restructure task_mm_cid_work for predictability Mathieu Desnoyers

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.