All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com" <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"jpoimboe@redhat.com" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"jthierry@redhat.com" <jthierry@redhat.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pasha.tatashin@soleen.com" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:38:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da7baa1f-6ee3-ffa4-0b22-73fdde7657a9@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR01MB5257FA9C1E94B136E1977790852B9@TY2PR01MB5257.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

OK. Thanks for the info. I will be more sensitive and change the name
to something more appropriate.

Madhavan

On 5/18/21 9:06 PM, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi Madhavan,
> 
>> +static bool unwinder_blacklisted(unsigned long pc)
>> +{
> 
> I've heard that the Linux community is currently avoiding the introduction of the
> term 'blacklist', see:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=49decddd39e5f6132ccd7d9fdc3d7c470b0061bb
> 
> 
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Keiya Nobuta
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com" <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"jpoimboe@redhat.com" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"jthierry@redhat.com" <jthierry@redhat.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pasha.tatashin@soleen.com" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them in the unwinder
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:38:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da7baa1f-6ee3-ffa4-0b22-73fdde7657a9@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR01MB5257FA9C1E94B136E1977790852B9@TY2PR01MB5257.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

OK. Thanks for the info. I will be more sensitive and change the name
to something more appropriate.

Madhavan

On 5/18/21 9:06 PM, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi Madhavan,
> 
>> +static bool unwinder_blacklisted(unsigned long pc)
>> +{
> 
> I've heard that the Linux community is currently avoiding the introduction of the
> term 'blacklist', see:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=49decddd39e5f6132ccd7d9fdc3d7c470b0061bb
> 
> 
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Keiya Nobuta
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <68eeda61b3e9579d65698a884b26c8632025e503>
2021-05-16  4:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-05-16  4:00   ` madvenka
2021-05-16  4:00   ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack " madvenka
2021-05-16  4:00     ` madvenka
2021-05-21 16:11     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 16:11       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:23       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:23         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:42         ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:42           ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:47           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:47             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:53             ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:53               ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 18:48               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 18:48                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 18:59                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 18:59                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 19:11                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 19:11                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 19:16                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 19:16                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 19:41                       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 19:41                         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 20:08                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-21 20:08                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-25 21:44               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-25 21:44                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-16  4:00   ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, blacklist them " madvenka
2021-05-16  4:00     ` madvenka
2021-05-19  2:06     ` nobuta.keiya
2021-05-19  2:06       ` nobuta.keiya
2021-05-19  3:38       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman [this message]
2021-05-19  3:38         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-19 19:27     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-19 19:27       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-20  2:00       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-20  2:00         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:18   ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks " Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:18     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:32     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:32       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:47       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:47         ` Mark Brown
2021-05-21 17:48         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-21 17:48           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da7baa1f-6ee3-ffa4-0b22-73fdde7657a9@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.