Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: Unbind the workqueue

[Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>]

On 9/23/24 00:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The ice workqueue doesn't seem to rely on any CPU locality and should
> therefore be able to run on any CPU. In practice this is already
> happening through the unbound ice_service_timer that may fire anywhere
> and queue the workqueue accordingly to any CPU.
> 
> Make this official so that the ice workqueue is only ever queued to
> housekeeping CPUs on nohz_full.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> index ea780d468579..70990f42ac05 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> @@ -5924,7 +5924,7 @@ static int __init ice_module_init(void)
>   
>   	ice_adv_lnk_speed_maps_init();
>   
> -	ice_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s", 0, 0, KBUILD_MODNAME);
> +	ice_wq = alloc_workqueue("%s", WQ_UNBOUND, 0, KBUILD_MODNAME);
>   	if (!ice_wq) {
>   		pr_err("Failed to create workqueue\n");
>   		return status;

Thank you for the patch, it would make sense for our iwl-next tree,
with such assumption:
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

@Tony, do you want it resent with target tree in the subject?