From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
conor+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
LnxRevLi <LnxRevLi@nxp.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Mpuaudiosw <Mpuaudiosw@nxp.com>,
"Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:51:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af1959ce-d817-2a9e-9c28-fed8c608a3df@linaro.org>
On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
>>>> Should I test this on other tree(s)?
>>> You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it
>>> on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send?
>>>
>>> If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next
>>> for this?
>> TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked.
>>
>> For sure one patch is for remoteproc.
>> For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on
>> linux-next, as you suggested.
> MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically,
> this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not
> be together in one patchset.
Hi Mathieu,
I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2.
So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately?
Thanks,
Iulia
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@nxp.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
"S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
conor+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
LnxRevLi <LnxRevLi@nxp.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Mpuaudiosw <Mpuaudiosw@nxp.com>,
"Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:51:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af1959ce-d817-2a9e-9c28-fed8c608a3df@linaro.org>
On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
>>>> Should I test this on other tree(s)?
>>> You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it
>>> on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send?
>>>
>>> If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next
>>> for this?
>> TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked.
>>
>> For sure one patch is for remoteproc.
>> For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on
>> linux-next, as you suggested.
> MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically,
> this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not
> be together in one patchset.
Hi Mathieu,
I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2.
So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately?
Thanks,
Iulia
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 22:44 [PATCH 0/2] Rpmsg support for i.MX DSP with resource table Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-11 22:44 ` Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add mandatory find_loaded_rsc_table op Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-11 22:44 ` Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add reserve-memory nodes for DSP Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-11 22:44 ` Iuliana Prodan (OSS)
2023-09-12 7:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 7:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 8:13 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 8:13 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 8:49 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 8:49 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-12 10:51 ` Iuliana Prodan [this message]
2023-09-12 10:51 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 14:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-09-12 14:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2023-09-12 10:58 ` Daniel Baluta
2023-09-12 10:58 ` Daniel Baluta
2023-09-12 11:30 ` Marco Felsch
2023-09-12 11:30 ` Marco Felsch
2023-09-12 11:33 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 11:33 ` Iuliana Prodan
2023-09-12 11:42 ` Marco Felsch
2023-09-12 11:42 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc402d33-88b1-e828-e6a5-2de060fbcdca@nxp.com \
--to=iuliana.prodan@nxp.com \
--cc=LnxRevLi@nxp.com \
--cc=Mpuaudiosw@nxp.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.