Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:32:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dce088b4-38ab-a540-6ac0-05ecc0b60aae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bac9e91-36a0-c1d6-a887-4d60567ac75a@linux.intel.com>

Hi Tvrtko,

On 10/12/20 4:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 29/09/2020 01:11, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>
>> On 9/28/20 5:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/09/2020 07:34, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The previous post of this series could be found here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200912032200.11489-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This version introduce a new patch [4/7] to fix an issue reported here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/51a1baec-48d1-c0ac-181b-1fba92aa428d@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There aren't any other changes.
>>>>
>>>> Please help to test and review.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> baolu
>>>>
>>>> Lu Baolu (3):
>>>>    iommu: Add quirk for Intel graphic devices in map_sg
>>>
>>> Since I do have patches to fix i915 to handle this, do we want to 
>>> co-ordinate the two and avoid having to add this quirk and then later 
>>> remove it? Or you want to go the staged approach?
>>
>> I have no preference. It depends on which patch goes first. Let the
>> maintainers help here.
> 
> FYI we have merged the required i915 patches to out tree last week or 
> so. I *think* this means they will go into 5.11. So the i915 specific 
> workaround patch will not be needed in Intel IOMMU.

Thanks for letting us know this. I will drop the workaround patch and
test the whole series after the next rc1.

Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:32:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dce088b4-38ab-a540-6ac0-05ecc0b60aae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bac9e91-36a0-c1d6-a887-4d60567ac75a@linux.intel.com>

Hi Tvrtko,

On 10/12/20 4:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 29/09/2020 01:11, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>
>> On 9/28/20 5:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/09/2020 07:34, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The previous post of this series could be found here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200912032200.11489-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This version introduce a new patch [4/7] to fix an issue reported here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/51a1baec-48d1-c0ac-181b-1fba92aa428d@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There aren't any other changes.
>>>>
>>>> Please help to test and review.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> baolu
>>>>
>>>> Lu Baolu (3):
>>>>    iommu: Add quirk for Intel graphic devices in map_sg
>>>
>>> Since I do have patches to fix i915 to handle this, do we want to 
>>> co-ordinate the two and avoid having to add this quirk and then later 
>>> remove it? Or you want to go the staged approach?
>>
>> I have no preference. It depends on which patch goes first. Let the
>> maintainers help here.
> 
> FYI we have merged the required i915 patches to out tree last week or 
> so. I *think* this means they will go into 5.11. So the i915 specific 
> workaround patch will not be needed in Intel IOMMU.

Thanks for letting us know this. I will drop the workaround patch and
test the whole series after the next rc1.

Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:32:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dce088b4-38ab-a540-6ac0-05ecc0b60aae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bac9e91-36a0-c1d6-a887-4d60567ac75a@linux.intel.com>

Hi Tvrtko,

On 10/12/20 4:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 29/09/2020 01:11, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Tvrtko,
>>
>> On 9/28/20 5:44 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/09/2020 07:34, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The previous post of this series could be found here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200912032200.11489-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This version introduce a new patch [4/7] to fix an issue reported here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/51a1baec-48d1-c0ac-181b-1fba92aa428d@linux.intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There aren't any other changes.
>>>>
>>>> Please help to test and review.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> baolu
>>>>
>>>> Lu Baolu (3):
>>>>    iommu: Add quirk for Intel graphic devices in map_sg
>>>
>>> Since I do have patches to fix i915 to handle this, do we want to 
>>> co-ordinate the two and avoid having to add this quirk and then later 
>>> remove it? Or you want to go the staged approach?
>>
>> I have no preference. It depends on which patch goes first. Let the
>> maintainers help here.
> 
> FYI we have merged the required i915 patches to out tree last week or 
> so. I *think* this means they will go into 5.11. So the i915 specific 
> workaround patch will not be needed in Intel IOMMU.

Thanks for letting us know this. I will drop the workaround patch and
test the whole series after the next rc1.

Best regards,
baolu

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-13  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-27  6:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/7] iommu: Handle freelists when using deferred flushing in iommu drivers Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/7] iommu: Add iommu_dma_free_cpu_cached_iovas() Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/7] iommu: Add quirk for Intel graphic devices in map_sg Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-03 12:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2020-11-03 12:00     ` Robin Murphy
2020-11-03 12:00     ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Update domain geometry in iommu_ops.at(de)tach_dev Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Convert intel iommu driver to the iommu ops Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup after converting to dma-iommu ops Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:34   ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-27  6:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api (rev3) Patchwork
2020-09-28  9:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-28  9:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-28  9:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-09-29  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lu Baolu
2020-09-29  0:11     ` Lu Baolu
2020-09-29  0:11     ` Lu Baolu
2020-10-01 12:17     ` [Intel-gfx] " Joerg Roedel
2020-10-01 12:17       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-01 12:17       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-02 11:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lu Baolu
2020-10-02 11:59         ` Lu Baolu
2020-10-02 11:59         ` Lu Baolu
2020-10-12  8:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-12  8:44       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-12  8:44       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-13  0:32       ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2020-10-13  0:32         ` Lu Baolu
2020-10-13  0:32         ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-02  2:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lu Baolu
2020-11-02  2:00         ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-02  2:00         ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-02 11:52         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-02 11:52           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-02 11:52           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-03  2:53           ` [Intel-gfx] " Lu Baolu
2020-11-03  2:53             ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-03  2:53             ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-03  9:14             ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-03  9:14               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-03  9:14               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-03  9:58               ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2020-11-03  9:58                 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-11-03  9:58                 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-11-03 10:54                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joerg Roedel
2020-11-03 10:54                   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-11-03 10:54                   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-11-20 10:20                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lu Baolu
2020-11-20 10:20                     ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-20 10:20                     ` Lu Baolu
2020-10-01 21:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 21:17   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 21:17   ` Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dce088b4-38ab-a540-6ac0-05ecc0b60aae@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=murphyt7@tcd.ie \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.