* [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider
@ 2022-06-18 5:23 fede.evol
2022-06-19 13:06 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: fede.evol @ 2022-06-18 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: poky; +Cc: Federico Pellegrin
Specific provider (ie. RPM or IPK) does "provide" just itself as a
package to the system. This will cause the "-dev" package, which
refers to the generic signing-keys and not the provider specific,
to miss the dependency.
Error case (RPM) when populating sdk:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides signing-keys = 1.0-r0 needed by signing-keys-dev-1.0-r0.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Examining signing-keys-rpm packages in PROVIDES we have indeed:
signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
But in signing-keys-dev: in REQUIRES:
signing-keys-1.0-r0
This MR will fix the situation bringing the specific provider
PROVIDES to include also the generic package (RPM example):
signing-keys
signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
Likely another way could be also to change the requirement for
dev or just allow empty packages as well.
Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin <fede@evolware.org>
---
meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb b/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
index 03463f95f56..d0602cf82af 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ FILES:${PN}-rpm = "${sysconfdir}/pki/rpm-gpg"
FILES:${PN}-ipk = "${sysconfdir}/pki/ipk-gpg"
FILES:${PN}-packagefeed = "${sysconfdir}/pki/packagefeed-gpg"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-rpm += "${PN}"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-ipk += "${PN}"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-packagefeed += "${PN}"
+
python do_get_public_keys () {
from oe.gpg_sign import get_signer
--
2.35.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider
2022-06-18 5:23 [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider fede.evol
@ 2022-06-19 13:06 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-06-19 15:13 ` Federico Pellegrin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Kjellerstedt @ 2022-06-19 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Federico Pellegrin, poky@lists.yoctoproject.org; +Cc: Federico Pellegrin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org <poky@lists.yoctoproject.org> On Behalf
> Of Federico Pellegrin
> Sent: den 18 juni 2022 07:23
> To: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org
> Cc: Federico Pellegrin <fede@evolware.org>
> Subject: [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from
> specific provider
Poky is made up of multiple repositories. Patches for meta should go to the
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org mailing list (this is documented
in README.md).
>
> Specific provider (ie. RPM or IPK) does "provide" just itself as a
> package to the system. This will cause the "-dev" package, which
> refers to the generic signing-keys and not the provider specific,
> to miss the dependency.
>
> Error case (RPM) when populating sdk:
>
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides signing-keys = 1.0-r0 needed by signing-keys-dev-1.0-
> r0.noarch
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> Examining signing-keys-rpm packages in PROVIDES we have indeed:
> signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
>
> But in signing-keys-dev: in REQUIRES:
> signing-keys-1.0-r0
>
> This MR will fix the situation bringing the specific provider
> PROVIDES to include also the generic package (RPM example):
> signing-keys
> signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
>
> Likely another way could be also to change the requirement for
> dev or just allow empty packages as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin <fede@evolware.org>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb b/meta/recipes-
> core/meta/signing-keys.bb
> index 03463f95f56..d0602cf82af 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ FILES:${PN}-rpm = "${sysconfdir}/pki/rpm-gpg"
> FILES:${PN}-ipk = "${sysconfdir}/pki/ipk-gpg"
> FILES:${PN}-packagefeed = "${sysconfdir}/pki/packagefeed-gpg"
>
> +RPROVIDES:${PN}-rpm += "${PN}"
> +RPROVIDES:${PN}-ipk += "${PN}"
> +RPROVIDES:${PN}-packagefeed += "${PN}"
This is incorrect. The correct thing to do is to instead remove the
dependency from ${PN}-dev on ${PN}, i.e.:
RDEPENDS:${PN}-dev = ""
> +
> python do_get_public_keys () {
> from oe.gpg_sign import get_signer
>
> --
> 2.35.3
//Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider
@ 2022-06-18 5:20 Federico Pellegrin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Federico Pellegrin @ 2022-06-18 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: poky, yocto; +Cc: Federico Pellegrin
Specific provider (ie. RPM or IPK) does "provide" just itself as a
package to the system. This will cause the "-dev" package, which
refers to the generic signing-keys and not the provider specific,
to miss the dependency.
Error case (RPM) when populating sdk:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides signing-keys = 1.0-r0 needed by signing-keys-dev-1.0-r0.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Examining signing-keys-rpm packages in PROVIDES we have indeed:
signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
But in signing-keys-dev: in REQUIRES:
signing-keys-1.0-r0
This MR will fix the situation bringing the specific provider
PROVIDES to include also the generic package (RPM example):
signing-keys
signing-keys-rpm = 1.0-r0
Likely another way could be also to change the requirement for
dev or just allow empty packages as well.
Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin <fede@evolware.org>
---
meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb b/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
index 03463f95f56..d0602cf82af 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/signing-keys.bb
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ FILES:${PN}-rpm = "${sysconfdir}/pki/rpm-gpg"
FILES:${PN}-ipk = "${sysconfdir}/pki/ipk-gpg"
FILES:${PN}-packagefeed = "${sysconfdir}/pki/packagefeed-gpg"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-rpm += "${PN}"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-ipk += "${PN}"
+RPROVIDES:${PN}-packagefeed += "${PN}"
+
python do_get_public_keys () {
from oe.gpg_sign import get_signer
--
2.35.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-19 15:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-18 5:23 [poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider fede.evol
2022-06-19 13:06 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2022-06-19 15:13 ` Federico Pellegrin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-18 5:20 Federico Pellegrin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.