[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: correct DPK settings

[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: correct DPK settings

[Ping-Ke Shih]

From: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@realtek.com>

Some hardware modules don't have good RF characteristic as regular.
It could have RF PA characteristic that current code doesn't handle
properly, and it runs into wrong DPK flow that doesn't complete DPK
resulting in bad EVM.

Signed-off-by: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 .../net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c | 38 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
index b0ea23d9f81fb..3c5fa3bb2a8f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static const u32 rtw8852c_backup_bb_regs[] = {
 };
 
 static const u32 rtw8852c_backup_rf_regs[] = {
-	0xdf, 0x8f, 0x97, 0xa3, 0x5, 0x10005
+	0xdf, 0x5f, 0x8f, 0x97, 0xa3, 0x5, 0x10005
 };
 
 #define BACKUP_BB_REGS_NR ARRAY_SIZE(rtw8852c_backup_bb_regs)
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ u8 _rx_dck_channel_calc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const struct rtw89_chan *chan)
 }
 
 #define RTW8852C_RF_REL_VERSION 34
-#define RTW8852C_DPK_VER 0x10
+#define RTW8852C_DPK_VER 0xf
 #define RTW8852C_DPK_TH_AVG_NUM 4
 #define RTW8852C_DPK_RF_PATH 2
 #define RTW8852C_DPK_KIP_REG_NUM 5
@@ -1797,6 +1797,12 @@ enum dpk_agc_step {
 	DPK_AGC_STEP_SET_TX_GAIN,
 };
 
+enum dpk_pas_result {
+	DPK_PAS_NOR,
+	DPK_PAS_GT,
+	DPK_PAS_LT,
+};
+
 static void _rf_direct_cntrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 			     enum rtw89_rf_path path, bool is_bybb)
 {
@@ -2206,9 +2212,10 @@ static u8 _dpk_gainloss(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
 	return _dpk_gainloss_read(rtwdev);
 }
 
-static bool _dpk_pas_read(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool is_check)
+static enum dpk_pas_result _dpk_pas_read(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool is_check)
 {
 	u32 val1_i = 0, val1_q = 0, val2_i = 0, val2_q = 0;
+	u32 val1_sqrt_sum, val2_sqrt_sum;
 	u8 i;
 
 	rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_KIP_RPT1, MASKBYTE2, 0x06);
@@ -2239,15 +2246,25 @@ static bool _dpk_pas_read(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, bool is_check)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (val1_i * val1_i + val1_q * val1_q >= (val2_i * val2_i + val2_q * val2_q) * 8 / 5)
-		return true;
+	val1_sqrt_sum = val1_i * val1_i + val1_q * val1_q;
+	val2_sqrt_sum = val2_i * val2_i + val2_q * val2_q;
+
+	if (val1_sqrt_sum < val2_sqrt_sum)
+		return DPK_PAS_LT;
+	else if (val1_sqrt_sum >= val2_sqrt_sum * 8 / 5)
+		return DPK_PAS_GT;
 	else
-		return false;
+		return DPK_PAS_NOR;
 }
 
 static bool _dpk_kip_set_rxagc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
 			       enum rtw89_rf_path path, u8 kidx)
 {
+	_dpk_kip_control_rfc(rtwdev, path, false);
+	rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_KIP_MOD, B_KIP_MOD,
+			       rtw89_read_rf(rtwdev, path, RR_MOD, RFREG_MASK));
+	_dpk_kip_control_rfc(rtwdev, path, true);
+
 	_dpk_one_shot(rtwdev, phy, path, D_RXAGC);
 
 	return _dpk_sync_check(rtwdev, path, kidx);
@@ -2285,6 +2302,7 @@ static u8 _dpk_agc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
 	u8 tmp_dbm = init_xdbm, tmp_gl_idx = 0;
 	u8 tmp_rxbb;
 	u8 goout = 0, agc_cnt = 0;
+	enum dpk_pas_result pas;
 	u16 dgain = 0;
 	bool is_fail = false;
 	int limit = 200;
@@ -2320,9 +2338,13 @@ static u8 _dpk_agc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
 
 		case DPK_AGC_STEP_GAIN_LOSS_IDX:
 			tmp_gl_idx = _dpk_gainloss(rtwdev, phy, path, kidx);
+			pas = _dpk_pas_read(rtwdev, true);
 
-			if ((tmp_gl_idx == 0 && _dpk_pas_read(rtwdev, true)) ||
-			    tmp_gl_idx >= 7)
+			if (pas == DPK_PAS_LT && tmp_gl_idx > 0)
+				step = DPK_AGC_STEP_GL_LT_CRITERION;
+			else if (pas == DPK_PAS_GT && tmp_gl_idx == 0)
+				step = DPK_AGC_STEP_GL_GT_CRITERION;
+			else if (tmp_gl_idx >= 7)
 				step = DPK_AGC_STEP_GL_GT_CRITERION;
 			else if (tmp_gl_idx == 0)
 				step = DPK_AGC_STEP_GL_LT_CRITERION;
-- 
2.25.1

RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: correct DPK settings

[Ping-Ke Shih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 12:39 PM
> To: kvalo@kernel.org
> Cc: Gary Chang <gary.chang@realtek.com>; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: correct DPK settings

Since this title is the same as previous patch, please drop this patch, and
I'll send v2 to change the title.

Sorry for the inconvenience. 

Ping-Ke