Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] PCI: brcmstb: Wait for Raspberry Pi's firmware when present

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 4/4/2020 12:20 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 14:38 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Rob for DT platform device dependency question]
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> Sorry it wasn't clear enough, I'll redo this comment. Also note that
>>> the PCIe bus and the XHCI chip are hardwired, so that's the only
>>> device that'll ever be available on the bus.
>>>
>>> VIA805's XHCI firmware has to be loaded trough RPi's firmware
>>> mailbox in between the PCIe bus probe and the subsequent USB probe.
>>> Note that a PCI reset clears the firmware. The only mechanism
>>> available in between the two operations are PCI Fixups. These are
>>> limited in their own way, as I can't return -EPROBE_DEFER if the
>>> firmware interface isn't available yet. Hence the need for an
>>> explicit dependency between pcie-brcmstb and raspberrypi's firmware
>>> mailbox device.
>>>
>>> Your concern here showcases this series' limitations. From a high
>>> level perspective it's not clear to me who should be responsible for
>>> downloading the firmware. 
>>
>> I think it's fairly common for drivers to download firmware to their
>> devices.  I guess there's not really any need to download the firmware
>> until a driver wants to use the device, right?
>>
>>> And I get the feeling I'm abusing PCI fixups. I haven't found any
>>> smart way to deal with this three way dependency of
>>> platform/non-platform devices.
>>
>> So IIUC, the three-way dependency involves:
>>
>>   1) brcm_pcie_probe(), which initialize the PCI host controller
>>   platform device, enumerates PCI devices, and makes them available
>>   for driver binding,
> 
> Yes, and also resets the PCI bus, which will clear VL805's firmware (the XHCI
> chip).
> 
>>   2) the firmware mailbox initialization (maybe
>>   rpi_firmware_probe()?),
>>
>>   3) quirk_usb_early_handoff(), which downloads firmware to the VL805
>>   PCI USB adapter via rpi_firmware_init_vl805(), which uses the
>>   firmware mailbox?
> 
> And yes, that's the general idea.
> 
>> Is there some way to express a dependency between
>> "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware" (the platform device claimed by
>> rpi_firmware_probe() and "brcm,bcm2711-pcie"?  If we could ensure that
>> rpi_firmware_probe() runs before brcm_pcie_probe(), would that solve
>> part of this?
> 
> That's ultimately what this patch tries to achieve. If there was a way to
> offload it to DT it would be way nicer.

Have you looked whether device links between producer/consumer could
help here? AFAICT there is not usually a way to express an ordering
dependency other than by referencing symbols from a different module,
which falls apart when everything gets built into the kernel obviously
and then you are at the mercy of the linking order and initicall levels.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.13/driver-api/device_link.html
-- 
Florian