From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:42:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df77f830-e5dd-5943-d5b0-e21ced3a7df2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212023343.52215-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2019/2/12 10:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> If we met this once, let fsck.f2fs clear this only.
> Note that, this addresses all the subtle fault injection test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 03fea4efd64b..10a3ada28715 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -1267,8 +1267,6 @@ static void update_ckpt_flags(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>
> if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH))
> __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
> - else
> - __clear_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
I didn't get it, previously, if we didn't persist all quota file's data in
checkpoint, then we will tag CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG in CP area, but in current
checkpoint, we have persisted all quota file's data, quota files are consistent
with all other files in filesystem, why we can't remove this NEED_FSCK flag..?
Thanks,
>
> if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR))
> __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:42:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df77f830-e5dd-5943-d5b0-e21ced3a7df2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212023343.52215-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2019/2/12 10:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> If we met this once, let fsck.f2fs clear this only.
> Note that, this addresses all the subtle fault injection test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 03fea4efd64b..10a3ada28715 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -1267,8 +1267,6 @@ static void update_ckpt_flags(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>
> if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH))
> __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
> - else
> - __clear_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
I didn't get it, previously, if we didn't persist all quota file's data in
checkpoint, then we will tag CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG in CP area, but in current
checkpoint, we have persisted all quota file's data, quota files are consistent
with all other files in filesystem, why we can't remove this NEED_FSCK flag..?
Thanks,
>
> if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR))
> __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-13 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 2:33 [PATCH] f2fs: don't clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-13 3:42 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-02-13 3:42 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2019-02-16 4:55 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-16 4:55 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-18 9:10 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-18 9:10 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-20 7:08 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-20 7:25 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-20 7:25 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-20 7:31 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-20 7:31 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-22 2:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-22 3:27 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-22 3:27 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-26 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-02-28 1:08 ` Chao Yu
2019-02-28 1:08 ` Chao Yu
2019-05-10 9:45 ` Chao Yu
2019-05-10 9:45 ` Chao Yu
2019-05-20 23:24 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df77f830-e5dd-5943-d5b0-e21ced3a7df2@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.