From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid to /proc/cpuinfo output
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfaa54b3-0ffa-7e75-93d1-15e4e0316dac@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620115549.1529597-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
On 6/20/22 13:55, Anup Patel wrote:
> Identifying the underlying RISC-V implementation can be important
> for some of the user space applications. For example, the perf tool
> uses arch specific CPU implementation id (i.e. CPUID) to select a
> JSON file describing custom perf events on a CPU.
>
> Currently, there is no way to identify RISC-V implementation so we
> add mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid to /proc/cpuinfo output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Looks good to me. I only tested on QEMU where all values default to 0.
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index fba9e9f46a8c..c037b8691bbb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -3,10 +3,13 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
> */
>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> @@ -64,6 +67,50 @@ int riscv_of_parent_hartid(struct device_node *node)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +
> +struct riscv_cpuinfo {
> + unsigned long mvendorid;
> + unsigned long marchid;
> + unsigned long mimpid;
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo);
> +
> +static int riscv_cpuinfo_starting(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo);
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)
> + ci->mvendorid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mvendorid();
> + ci->marchid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_marchid();
> + ci->mimpid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mimpid();
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)
> + ci->mvendorid = csr_read(CSR_MVENDORID);
> + ci->marchid = csr_read(CSR_MARCHID);
> + ci->mimpid = csr_read(CSR_MIMPID);
> +#else
> + ci->mvendorid = 0;
> + ci->marchid = 0;
> + ci->mimpid = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init riscv_cpuinfo_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv/cpuinfo:starting",
> + riscv_cpuinfo_starting, NULL);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("cpuinfo: failed to register hotplug callbacks.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init);
> +
> #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(UPROP, EXTID) \
> { \
> .uprop = #UPROP, \
> @@ -178,6 +225,7 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> unsigned long cpu_id = (unsigned long)v - 1;
> struct device_node *node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu_id, NULL);
> + struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo, cpu_id);
> const char *compat, *isa;
>
> seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %lu\n", cpu_id);
> @@ -188,6 +236,9 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> if (!of_property_read_string(node, "compatible", &compat)
> && strcmp(compat, "riscv"))
> seq_printf(m, "uarch\t\t: %s\n", compat);
> + seq_printf(m, "mvendorid\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->mvendorid);
> + seq_printf(m, "marchid\t\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->marchid);
> + seq_printf(m, "mimpid\t\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->mimpid);
> seq_puts(m, "\n");
> of_node_put(node);
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid to /proc/cpuinfo output
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfaa54b3-0ffa-7e75-93d1-15e4e0316dac@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620115549.1529597-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
On 6/20/22 13:55, Anup Patel wrote:
> Identifying the underlying RISC-V implementation can be important
> for some of the user space applications. For example, the perf tool
> uses arch specific CPU implementation id (i.e. CPUID) to select a
> JSON file describing custom perf events on a CPU.
>
> Currently, there is no way to identify RISC-V implementation so we
> add mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid to /proc/cpuinfo output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Looks good to me. I only tested on QEMU where all values default to 0.
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index fba9e9f46a8c..c037b8691bbb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -3,10 +3,13 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California
> */
>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> @@ -64,6 +67,50 @@ int riscv_of_parent_hartid(struct device_node *node)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +
> +struct riscv_cpuinfo {
> + unsigned long mvendorid;
> + unsigned long marchid;
> + unsigned long mimpid;
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo);
> +
> +static int riscv_cpuinfo_starting(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo);
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)
> + ci->mvendorid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mvendorid();
> + ci->marchid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_marchid();
> + ci->mimpid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mimpid();
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)
> + ci->mvendorid = csr_read(CSR_MVENDORID);
> + ci->marchid = csr_read(CSR_MARCHID);
> + ci->mimpid = csr_read(CSR_MIMPID);
> +#else
> + ci->mvendorid = 0;
> + ci->marchid = 0;
> + ci->mimpid = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init riscv_cpuinfo_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv/cpuinfo:starting",
> + riscv_cpuinfo_starting, NULL);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("cpuinfo: failed to register hotplug callbacks.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(riscv_cpuinfo_init);
> +
> #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(UPROP, EXTID) \
> { \
> .uprop = #UPROP, \
> @@ -178,6 +225,7 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> unsigned long cpu_id = (unsigned long)v - 1;
> struct device_node *node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu_id, NULL);
> + struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo, cpu_id);
> const char *compat, *isa;
>
> seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %lu\n", cpu_id);
> @@ -188,6 +236,9 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> if (!of_property_read_string(node, "compatible", &compat)
> && strcmp(compat, "riscv"))
> seq_printf(m, "uarch\t\t: %s\n", compat);
> + seq_printf(m, "mvendorid\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->mvendorid);
> + seq_printf(m, "marchid\t\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->marchid);
> + seq_printf(m, "mimpid\t\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->mimpid);
> seq_puts(m, "\n");
> of_node_put(node);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 11:55 [PATCH] RISC-V: Add mvendorid, marchid, and mimpid to /proc/cpuinfo output Anup Patel
2022-06-20 11:55 ` Anup Patel
2022-06-20 13:57 ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2022-06-20 13:57 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-06-20 15:42 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-20 15:42 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-21 7:40 ` Nikita Shubin
2022-06-21 7:40 ` Nikita Shubin
2022-06-21 8:28 ` David Abdurachmanov
2022-06-21 8:28 ` David Abdurachmanov
2022-07-26 11:57 ` Anup Patel
2022-07-26 11:57 ` Anup Patel
2022-07-26 13:40 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-26 13:40 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-26 13:43 ` Anup Patel
2022-07-26 13:43 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfaa54b3-0ffa-7e75-93d1-15e4e0316dac@canonical.com \
--to=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.