From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/12]: MUTEX: Introduce mutex implementation
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:13:06 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dhowells1134774786@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
This set of patches implements mutexes as an alternative to semaphores where
such more restricted behaviour is appropriate.
There are several changes that might be appropriate to these patches:
(1) Name DECLARE_MUTEX as DEFINE_MUTEX in linux/mutex-*.h
(2) Make mutex_trylock()'s return value consistent with semaphores rather
than everything else.
(3) Drop the testing module (patch 12/12). I'm not sure I've got the plumbing
correct in the master makefile.
Patches to come after Christmas will include sem -> completion conversions and
sem -> mutex conversions.
Merry Christmas!
David
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-16 23:13 David Howells [this message]
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 3/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for arch/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes David Howells
2005-12-17 3:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-17 7:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-17 19:21 ` David Howells
2005-12-17 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-17 21:44 ` Russell King
2005-12-18 1:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 2:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 4:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 4:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-18 6:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 9:26 ` Russell King
2005-12-18 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-18 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-18 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 1:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-19 9:27 ` Russell King
2005-12-19 13:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-12-19 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-19 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 17:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-18 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-18 17:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-17 7:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-17 12:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/12]: MUTEX: Provide SWAP-based mutex for FRV David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 7/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for include/asm-*/ dirs David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 6/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for fs/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 4/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for drivers/ dir, A thru M David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 11/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for miscellaneous directories David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 8/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for kernel/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 5/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for drivers/ dir, N thru Z David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 9/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for net/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 10/12]: MUTEX: Rename DECLARE_MUTEX for sound/ dir David Howells
2005-12-16 23:13 ` [PATCH 12/12]: MUTEX: Provide synchronisation primitive testing module David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dhowells1134774786@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.