[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

["André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>]

Hi,

sorry Simon for dropping the ball earlier. I will try to answer both
Jagan's and your concern below.

On 16/10/17 21:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>> reg property in that node.
>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>
>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
> 
> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
> dts wrt Linux dts sync.

This is not the kernel .dts, but the FIT image description (using the
DTS format), which is purely private to U-Boot. I erroneously used
addresses (fdt at 1) to enumerate different FDTs.
I don't think this is right, since those FDTs don't have anything which
would resemble an address. Instead the SPL just chooses one of them, and
the script generates as many as we give it (from defconfig).

So I don't see much sense in introducing a "reg" property. Multiple
instances of an UART are alive at the same time, so an address property
makes sense. But we just need *one* FDT and some unique name used to
match configuration entries to the appropriate image. Actually those
identifiers could be totally random as well, or we actually use
something derived from the filename.
But for simplicity I'd just go with the underscore notation, unless
someone convinces me otherwise.

Cheers,
Andre.