From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com
Cc: a.manzanares@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com,
neeraj.kernel@gmail.com, cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:50:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e45d7687-fb93-4d2e-8cb4-e84c5a7ce782@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917134116.1623730-15-s.neeraj@samsung.com>
On 9/17/25 6:41 AM, Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is used to create cxl region based on region
> information scanned from LSA.
>
> devm_cxl_add_region() is used to just allocate cxlr and its fields are
> filled later by userspace tool using device attributes (*_store()).
>
> Inspiration for devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is taken from these device
> attributes (_store*) calls. It allocates cxlr and fills information
> parsed from LSA and calls device_add(&cxlr->dev) to initiate further
> region creation porbes
>
> Renamed __create_region() to cxl_create_region() and make it an exported
> routine. This will be used in later patch to create cxl region after
> fetching region information from LSA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 12 ++++
> 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c325aa827992..d5c227ce7b09 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -2573,6 +2573,116 @@ static struct cxl_region *devm_cxl_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> return ERR_PTR(rc);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr, u64 size)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + ACQUIRE(rwsem_write_kill, rwsem)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
> + rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(rwsem_write_kill, &rwsem);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
Just a nit. Please conform to existing style in the subsystem for this new usage.
+ ACQUIRE(rwsem_write_kill, rwsem)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
+ if ((rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(rwsem_write_kill, &rwsem))))
+ return rc;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return alloc_hpa(cxlr, size);
> +}
I think you can create another helper free_region_hpa() and call them in size_store() function to remove the duplicate code.
> +
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_dpa(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled, u64 size)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, SZ_256M))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rc = cxl_dpa_free(cxled);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + return cxl_dpa_alloc(cxled, size);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_region *
> +devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, int id,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode,
Wouldn't this not needed since it would be CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM always? I also wonder if we need to rename devm_cxl_add_region() to devm_cxl_add_ram_region() to be explicit.
> + enum cxl_decoder_type type,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
> + struct cxl_region_params *p;
> + struct cxl_port *root_port;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + struct cxl_region *cxlr __free(put_cxl_region) =
> + cxl_region_alloc(cxlrd, id);
> + if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> + return cxlr;
> +
> + cxlr->mode = mode;
> + cxlr->type = type;
> +
> + dev = &cxlr->dev;
> + rc = dev_set_name(dev, "region%d", id);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + p = &cxlr->params;
> + p->uuid = params->uuid;
> + p->interleave_ways = params->nlabel;
> + p->interleave_granularity = params->ig;
> +
> + rc = alloc_region_hpa(cxlr, params->rawsize);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + cxled = to_cxl_endpoint_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> +
> + rc = cxl_dpa_set_part(cxled, CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = alloc_region_dpa(cxled, params->rawsize);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Currently we have support of interleave_way == 1, where
> + * we can only have one region per mem device. It means mem device
> + * position (params->position) will always be 0. It is therefore
> + * attaching only one target at params->position
> + */
> + if (params->position)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
EOPNOTSUPP?
Speaking of which, are there plans to support interleave in the near future?
DJ
> +
> + rc = attach_target(cxlr, cxled, params->position, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = __commit(cxlr);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + rc = device_add(dev);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + root_port = to_cxl_port(cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev.parent);
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(root_port->uport_dev,
> + unregister_region, cxlr);
> + if (rc)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> + dev_dbg(root_port->uport_dev, "%s: created %s\n",
> + dev_name(&cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev), dev_name(dev));
> +
> + return no_free_ptr(cxlr);
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t __create_region_show(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, char *buf)
> {
> return sysfs_emit(buf, "region%u\n", atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> @@ -2590,8 +2700,10 @@ static ssize_t create_ram_region_show(struct device *dev,
> return __create_region_show(to_cxl_root_decoder(dev), buf);
> }
>
> -static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> - enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id)
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *pmem_params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> {
> int rc;
>
> @@ -2613,8 +2725,12 @@ static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> }
>
> + if (pmem_params)
> + return devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(cxlrd, id, mode,
> + CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM, pmem_params, cxld);
> return devm_cxl_add_region(cxlrd, id, mode, CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_create_region, "CXL");
>
> static ssize_t create_region_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> size_t len, enum cxl_partition_mode mode)
> @@ -2627,7 +2743,7 @@ static ssize_t create_region_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> if (rc != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, mode, id);
> + cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, mode, id, NULL, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> return PTR_ERR(cxlr);
>
> @@ -3523,8 +3639,9 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> struct cxl_region *cxlr;
>
> do {
> - cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> - atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> + cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> + atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id),
> + NULL, NULL);
> } while (IS_ERR(cxlr) && PTR_ERR(cxlr) == -EBUSY);
>
> if (IS_ERR(cxlr)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index b57597e55f7e..3abadc3dc82e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -874,6 +874,10 @@ int cxl_add_to_region(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled);
> struct cxl_dax_region *to_cxl_dax_region(struct device *dev);
> u64 cxl_port_get_spa_cache_alias(struct cxl_port *endpoint, u64 spa);
> void cxl_region_discovery(struct cxl_port *port);
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld);
> #else
> static inline bool is_cxl_pmem_region(struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -899,6 +903,14 @@ static inline u64 cxl_port_get_spa_cache_alias(struct cxl_port *endpoint,
> static inline void cxl_region_discovery(struct cxl_port *port)
> {
> }
> +static inline struct cxl_region *
> +cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> + struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> #endif
>
> void cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat(struct cxl_port *port);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250917134126epcas5p3e20c773759b91f70a1caa32b9f6f27ff@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 01/20] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_REGION_LABELING flag to set region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:10 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:41 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 02/20] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:31 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:40 ` [PATCH V3 03/20] nvdimm/label: Modify nd_label_base() signature Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 21:42 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-19 23:34 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:44 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:02 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:07 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 04/20] nvdimm/label: Update mutex_lock() with guard(mutex)() Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 21:55 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 12:56 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:50 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-20 17:44 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 13:01 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:42 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:19 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 05/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Add namespace label changes as per CXL LSA v2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 22:00 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-22 13:05 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-19 23:59 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 13:03 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 21:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:28 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 06/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label update support Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-22 13:12 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:56 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 23:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:24 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 07/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label delete support Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-22 21:37 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:13 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 08/20] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-22 22:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:17 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:30 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:10 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 09/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 10/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 11/20] nvdimm/region_label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 12/20] nvdimm/region_label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 20:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:26 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 13/20] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 22:37 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:30 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 15:55 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-07 12:39 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-12 15:55 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-13 7:27 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 23:50 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2025-09-29 13:37 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 15/20] cxl: Add a routine to find cxl root decoder on cxl bus using cxl port Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:40 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:02 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 16/20] cxl/mem: Preserve cxl root decoder during mem probe Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:52 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 21:38 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 14:13 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 17/20] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 18/20] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 18:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 13:57 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-07 12:49 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-12 15:40 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-13 7:29 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:09 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 19/20] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 20:25 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 14:00 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH V3 20/20] cxl/pmem: Add CXL LSA 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-24 20:47 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-29 14:02 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-10-06 16:13 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-17 14:50 ` [PATCH V3 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and " Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-17 15:38 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-22 12:36 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-23 23:04 ` Alison Schofield
2025-09-29 13:33 ` Neeraj Kumar
[not found] <CGME20250917133050epcas5p3979792644e47ee94956bcf00c84a832e@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-09-17 13:29 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-17 13:29 ` [PATCH V3 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e45d7687-fb93-4d2e-8cb4-e84c5a7ce782@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.