From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"nguyenb@codeaurora.org" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>,
"hongwus@codeaurora.org" <hongwus@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:18:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7605343-5785-e708-751b-72a66e4e0b67@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB657525D67B70FF3418511694FC229@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/28/2021 12:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
>>> Hi Bart,
>>> No it's not necessary to serialize both the paths. I think this series
>>> attempts to remove this serialization to a certain degree, which is
>>> what's giving the performance improvement.
> Btw, Is this performance improvement is on top of rq_affinity 2 or 1?
>
It's on 1.
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>>
>>> Even if multiqueue support would be available in the future, I think
>>> this change is apt now for the current available specification.
>> I agree - this looks like the harbinger of a major change,
>> And going further with respect of hw queues,
>> will need the spec support - e.g. doorbell per lane, etc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Avri
>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bart.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -asd
>>>
>>> --
>>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>>> Forum,
>>> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"nguyenb@codeaurora.org" <nguyenb@codeaurora.org>,
"hongwus@codeaurora.org" <hongwus@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:18:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7605343-5785-e708-751b-72a66e4e0b67@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB657525D67B70FF3418511694FC229@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/28/2021 12:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
>>> Hi Bart,
>>> No it's not necessary to serialize both the paths. I think this series
>>> attempts to remove this serialization to a certain degree, which is
>>> what's giving the performance improvement.
> Btw, Is this performance improvement is on top of rq_affinity 2 or 1?
>
It's on 1.
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>>
>>> Even if multiqueue support would be available in the future, I think
>>> this change is apt now for the current available specification.
>> I agree - this looks like the harbinger of a major change,
>> And going further with respect of hw queues,
>> will need the spec support - e.g. doorbell per lane, etc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Avri
>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bart.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -asd
>>>
>>> --
>>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>>> Forum,
>>> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 8:36 [PATCH v1 0/3] Optimize host lock on TR send/compl paths and utilize UTRLCNR Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Remove a redundant command completion logic in error handler Can Guo
2021-05-24 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 4:15 ` Stanley Chu
2021-05-31 7:14 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 11:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 11:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-08 17:53 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-08 17:53 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-09 1:01 ` Can Guo
2021-06-09 1:01 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 1:34 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 1:34 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-06-02 21:18 ` Asutosh Das (asd) [this message]
2021-06-02 21:18 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 1:40 ` Can Guo
2021-05-25 1:40 ` Can Guo
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-06-02 2:14 ` Can Guo
2021-06-02 2:14 ` Can Guo
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-04 1:49 ` Can Guo
2021-06-04 1:49 ` Can Guo
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 2:04 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 2:04 ` Can Guo
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-29 5:41 ` Can Guo
2021-06-29 5:41 ` Can Guo
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Utilize Transfer Request List Completion Notification Register Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-16 3:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Optimize host lock on TR send/compl paths and utilize UTRLCNR Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7605343-5785-e708-751b-72a66e4e0b67@codeaurora.org \
--to=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hongwus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.