Re: [PATCH] memory: Use dev_fwnode()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 12/06/2025 13:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/06/2025 12:43, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
>> irq_domain_create_simple() takes fwnode as the first argument. It can be
>> extracted from the struct device using dev_fwnode() helper instead of
>> using of_node with of_fwnode_handle().
>>
>> So use the dev_fwnode() helper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
> Please send patches standard way, so without fake in-reply-to. b4 shazam
> on entire patchset (because this is not a continuation - see subject
> prefix) grabs entirely wrong patch:
> 
> -----------------
> Grabbing thread from
> lore.kernel.org/all/20250611104348.192092-12-jirislaby@kernel.org/t.mbox.gz
> Breaking thread to remove parents of
> 20250611104348.192092-12-jirislaby@kernel.org
> Checking for newer revisions
> Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>   Added from v2: 1 patches
> Analyzing 10 messages in the thread
> Analyzing 19 code-review messages
> Will use the latest revision: v2
> You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
>   ✓ [PATCH v2] iio: adc: stm32-adc: Use dev_fwnode()
>     + Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612084627.217341-1-jirislaby@kernel.org
> -----------------
> 
> Applying single patch also fails:
> 
> 
> -----------------
> Grabbing thread from
> lore.kernel.org/all/20250611104348.192092-12-jirislaby@kernel.org/t.mbox.gz
> Checking for newer revisions
> Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>   Added from v2: 1 patches
> Analyzing 10 messages in the thread
> Analyzing 19 code-review messages
> Will use the latest revision: v2
> You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> Specified msgid is not present in the series, cannot cherrypick
> -----------------

ok, -v1 helped, but this entire dance could be avoided if you sent it
standard way, without confusing threading and attaching on patch to
something else.

Best regards,
Krzysztof