From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc tree
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:26:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9f0518d-e0ba-5fc1-1984-0fcfb9fe9102@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afeb9fad-0d3b-48ac-82da-218dcd8010e7@app.fastmail.com>
On 22/06/2023 10:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 02:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-390-db.dts:84.10-106.4: Warning
>> (spi_bus_reg): /soc/spi@10680/flash@1: SPI bus unit address format
>> error, expected "0"
>>
>> I am not sure why this has only shown up now.
>
> Thanks for the report, I also just ran into the same thing.
> It's probably instroduced by 89e73afc3f540 ("ARM: dts: marvell:
> align SPI NOR node name with dtschema"), but I don't know why
> there was no warning before.
>
> Added the fixup patch now.
The unit/reg mismatch was there before my commit. Maybe something
changed in default flags for dtc compiler, thus the warning appeared?
>
> Arnd
>
> ---
> commit 7dc3be1745d05c1ed7d385487238ec06a07f4f29
> Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date: Thu Jun 22 10:14:02 2023 +0200
>
> ARM: mvebu: fix unit address on armada-390-db flash
>
> The unit address needs to be changed to match the reg property:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-390-db.dts:84.10-106.4: Warning (spi_bus_reg): /soc/spi@10680/flash@1: SPI bus unit address format error, expected "0"
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc tree
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:26:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9f0518d-e0ba-5fc1-1984-0fcfb9fe9102@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afeb9fad-0d3b-48ac-82da-218dcd8010e7@app.fastmail.com>
On 22/06/2023 10:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023, at 02:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-390-db.dts:84.10-106.4: Warning
>> (spi_bus_reg): /soc/spi@10680/flash@1: SPI bus unit address format
>> error, expected "0"
>>
>> I am not sure why this has only shown up now.
>
> Thanks for the report, I also just ran into the same thing.
> It's probably instroduced by 89e73afc3f540 ("ARM: dts: marvell:
> align SPI NOR node name with dtschema"), but I don't know why
> there was no warning before.
>
> Added the fixup patch now.
The unit/reg mismatch was there before my commit. Maybe something
changed in default flags for dtc compiler, thus the warning appeared?
>
> Arnd
>
> ---
> commit 7dc3be1745d05c1ed7d385487238ec06a07f4f29
> Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date: Thu Jun 22 10:14:02 2023 +0200
>
> ARM: mvebu: fix unit address on armada-390-db flash
>
> The unit address needs to be changed to match the reg property:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell/armada-390-db.dts:84.10-106.4: Warning (spi_bus_reg): /soc/spi@10680/flash@1: SPI bus unit address format error, expected "0"
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 0:48 linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-22 0:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-22 8:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-06-22 8:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-06-22 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-06-22 8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-22 13:55 ` Rob Herring
2023-06-22 13:55 ` Rob Herring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-02 7:49 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-02 11:55 ` Marek Behún
2024-07-30 10:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22 21:59 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22 21:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22 23:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-22 23:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-22 23:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-22 23:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-23 8:50 ` Arınç ÜNAL
2021-12-23 8:50 ` Arınç ÜNAL
2021-12-23 18:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-23 18:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-25 23:39 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-25 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-26 6:15 ` Joel Stanley
2021-10-26 6:15 ` Joel Stanley
2022-01-20 3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-20 3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-20 6:03 ` ChiaWei Wang
2022-01-20 6:03 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-04-06 0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 6:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-04-06 6:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-15 23:25 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-15 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-15 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-15 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-29 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-29 23:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-03 6:49 ` Linus Walleij
2019-05-03 6:49 ` Linus Walleij
2019-05-03 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-03 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-19 23:39 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-19 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-19 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-19 7:39 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-19 7:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-19 7:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-19 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-19 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9f0518d-e0ba-5fc1-1984-0fcfb9fe9102@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.