* is 32bit linux 2.4 in unstable currently broken?
@ 2005-04-15 23:51 Christopher Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Clark @ 2005-04-15 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Is anyone else experiencing a breakage with the 32bit linux 2.4 build
with unstable?
Building linux-2.4.29-xen0 fails when building the netfilter code with
an error at sparse/include/asm-xen/hypervisor.h:85 which looks like 64
bit stuff to me.
using gcc 3.3.4
Christopher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: is 32bit linux 2.4 in unstable currently broken?
@ 2005-04-16 0:01 Ian Pratt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2005-04-16 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cwc22, xen-devel
> Is anyone else experiencing a breakage with the 32bit linux
> 2.4 build with unstable?
>
> Building linux-2.4.29-xen0 fails when building the netfilter
> code with an error at sparse/include/asm-xen/hypervisor.h:85
> which looks like 64 bit stuff to me.
I'm afraid so. The x86_64 checkin broke 2.4, and I'm afraid I just made
matters worse by preaking pci-dma.c for 2.4 (that can be fixed by just
putting a copy in the 2.4 sparse tree).
Neither should be hard to fix.
Sorry,
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-16 0:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-15 23:51 is 32bit linux 2.4 in unstable currently broken? Christopher Clark
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-16 0:01 Ian Pratt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.