From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, android-kvm@google.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:06:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eac273f8f0801969c650a3bd78052e0a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619095120.wenkbs5bl3wbyiyh@google.com>
On 2020-06-19 10:51, David Brazdil wrote:
> Hey Marc,
>
>> > - .popsection
>>
>> I'd be tempted to leave the .popsection in place, if only for symmetry
>> with
>> the initial .pushsection.
>
> I removed it because other .S files don't pop either. It must have been
> added
> here purely for the smccc workaround code. Happy to add it back if you
> prefer,
> but the pushsection is removed later in the series, so this would
> disappear
> as well.
Don't bother then.
>
>> > + .pushsection .rodata
>> > + .global __smccc_workaround_1_smc
>> > +__smccc_workaround_1_smc:
>>
>> You probably want to replace this with SYM_DATA_START (and
>> SYM_DATA_END at
>> the end).
>
> Done
Thanks!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
android-kvm@google.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:06:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eac273f8f0801969c650a3bd78052e0a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619095120.wenkbs5bl3wbyiyh@google.com>
On 2020-06-19 10:51, David Brazdil wrote:
> Hey Marc,
>
>> > - .popsection
>>
>> I'd be tempted to leave the .popsection in place, if only for symmetry
>> with
>> the initial .pushsection.
>
> I removed it because other .S files don't pop either. It must have been
> added
> here purely for the smccc workaround code. Happy to add it back if you
> prefer,
> but the pushsection is removed later in the series, so this would
> disappear
> as well.
Don't bother then.
>
>> > + .pushsection .rodata
>> > + .global __smccc_workaround_1_smc
>> > +__smccc_workaround_1_smc:
>>
>> You probably want to replace this with SYM_DATA_START (and
>> SYM_DATA_END at
>> the end).
>
> Done
Thanks!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:06:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eac273f8f0801969c650a3bd78052e0a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619095120.wenkbs5bl3wbyiyh@google.com>
On 2020-06-19 10:51, David Brazdil wrote:
> Hey Marc,
>
>> > - .popsection
>>
>> I'd be tempted to leave the .popsection in place, if only for symmetry
>> with
>> the initial .pushsection.
>
> I removed it because other .S files don't pop either. It must have been
> added
> here purely for the smccc workaround code. Happy to add it back if you
> prefer,
> but the pushsection is removed later in the series, so this would
> disappear
> as well.
Don't bother then.
>
>> > + .pushsection .rodata
>> > + .global __smccc_workaround_1_smc
>> > +__smccc_workaround_1_smc:
>>
>> You probably want to replace this with SYM_DATA_START (and
>> SYM_DATA_END at
>> the end).
>
> Done
Thanks!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 12:25 [PATCH v3 00/15] Split off nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 9:51 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 9:51 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 9:51 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-06-19 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] arm64: kvm: Add build rules for separate nVHE object files David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 16:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 16:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 16:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 12:11 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 12:11 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 12:11 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] arm64: kvm: Handle calls to prefixed hyp functions David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 16:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 16:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 16:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 17:04 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 17:04 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] arm64: kvm: Build hyp-entry.S separately for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-22 10:20 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-22 10:20 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-25 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 11:53 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-25 11:53 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-25 11:53 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] arm64: kvm: Move hyp-init.S to nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/tlb.c to VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/switch.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 19:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 19:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 19:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 19:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 8:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 8:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 8:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-25 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-25 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-25 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-25 16:37 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-06-25 16:37 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-06-25 16:37 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-06-25 16:37 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-06-25 17:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-25 17:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-25 17:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-25 17:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/debug-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/sysreg-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/timer-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] arm64: kvm: Compile remaining hyp/ files for both VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] arm64: kvm: Add comments around __kvm_nvhe_ symbol aliases David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] arm64: kvm: Remove __hyp_text macro, use build rules instead David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] arm64: kvm: Lift instrumentation restrictions on VHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eac273f8f0801969c650a3bd78052e0a@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=android-kvm@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.