All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* newer domU older hypervisor?
@ 2006-07-31 23:23 Shaun
  2006-08-01 14:21 ` Andrew D. Ball
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shaun @ 2006-07-31 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel


We provide DomU's for our customers and because of this we try to minimize 
the amount of times we have to reboot/down a host.  We also offer multiple 
kernels the customer can choose from with different configurations.  My 
question is will there be any issue with running newer domU kernels from 3.x 
changeset while hypervisor and dom0 run a kernel build from a older 3.x 
changeset?  Also how about the xen-tools?  If i build a newer version of 
those and run them against a older version of hypervisor and dom0 is that 
going to be asking for problems?

-- 

~Shaun 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: newer domU older hypervisor?
  2006-07-31 23:23 newer domU older hypervisor? Shaun
@ 2006-08-01 14:21 ` Andrew D. Ball
  2006-08-02  9:10   ` Keir Fraser
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew D. Ball @ 2006-08-01 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shaun; +Cc: xen-devel

Unfortunately, I think you are likely to have issues here.  You may have
luck having things at least work for basic functionality, but you
definitely need to match the hypervisor and dom0 kernel w/ the tools.

IMHO, it's a snafu to upgrade para-virtualized domU kernels that needs
to be addressed better.

Peace.
Andrew
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 16:23 -0700, Shaun wrote:
> We provide DomU's for our customers and because of this we try to minimize 
> the amount of times we have to reboot/down a host.  We also offer multiple 
> kernels the customer can choose from with different configurations.  My 
> question is will there be any issue with running newer domU kernels from 3.x 
> changeset while hypervisor and dom0 run a kernel build from a older 3.x 
> changeset?  Also how about the xen-tools?  If i build a newer version of 
> those and run them against a older version of hypervisor and dom0 is that 
> going to be asking for problems?
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: newer domU older hypervisor?
  2006-08-01 14:21 ` Andrew D. Ball
@ 2006-08-02  9:10   ` Keir Fraser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2006-08-02  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew D. Ball; +Cc: xen-devel, Shaun


On 1 Aug 2006, at 15:21, Andrew D. Ball wrote:

> Unfortunately, I think you are likely to have issues here.  You may 
> have
> luck having things at least work for basic functionality, but you
> definitely need to match the hypervisor and dom0 kernel w/ the tools.
>
> IMHO, it's a snafu to upgrade para-virtualized domU kernels that needs
> to be addressed better.

We are now trying to ensure that we maintain forward compatibility (new 
domU, old hypervisor). We already guarantee the other way round since 
3.0.0.

  -- Keir

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-02  9:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-31 23:23 newer domU older hypervisor? Shaun
2006-08-01 14:21 ` Andrew D. Ball
2006-08-02  9:10   ` Keir Fraser

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.