All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
	mingshan.zhang@intel.com, arun.joshi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] bbdev: reduce warning level for one scenario
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 05:54:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb024192-469b-bfe3-be3d-3abe354e028e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1631063741-28631-7-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>


On 9/7/21 6:15 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> Queue setup may genuinely fail when adding incremental queues
> for a given priority level. In that case application would
> attempt to configure a queue at a different priority level.
> Not an actual error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> index fc37236..defddcf 100644
> --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c
> @@ -528,9 +528,10 @@ struct rte_bbdev *
>   	ret = dev->dev_ops->queue_setup(dev, queue_id, (conf != NULL) ?
>   			conf : &dev_info.default_queue_conf);
>   	if (ret < 0) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"Device %u queue %u setup failed", dev_id,
> -				queue_id);
> +		/* This may happen when trying different priority levels */
> +		rte_bbdev_log(INFO,
> +				"Device %u queue %u setup failed",
> +				dev_id, queue_id);

This change is just changing the log level, which is fine.

I am looking at how the error handling is done for the function.

It seems like the bailing is done in the middle of change the queue state.

ex/ the block above this one

/* Release existing queue ... */

Does this leave the queue in a bad state ?

Tom

>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-12 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08  1:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] bbdev update related to CRC usage Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] bbdev: add capability for CRC16 check Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:35   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] baseband/turbo_sw: add support for CRC16 Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:38   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] bbdev: add capability for 4G CB CRC DROP Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:39   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] baseband/acc100: add support for 4G CRC drop Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:42   ` Tom Rix
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] doc: clarification of usage of HARQ in bbdev doc Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:44   ` Tom Rix
2021-10-11 20:29     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 20:33       ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-09-08  1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] bbdev: reduce warning level for one scenario Nicolas Chautru
2021-09-12 12:54   ` Tom Rix [this message]
2021-09-13 17:03     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-09-13 20:01       ` Tom Rix
2021-10-04 23:40         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2021-10-05 10:05           ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb024192-469b-bfe3-be3d-3abe354e028e@redhat.com \
    --to=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=arun.joshi@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingshan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.