All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Xu" <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] net: gro: decouple GRO from the NAPI layer
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:21:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eba70511-b6eb-4ff2-ae1a-183fa626d60a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3decafb9-34fe-4fb7-9203-259b813f810c@intel.com>

On 2/7/25 12:56, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:35:50 +0100
> 
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:15 PM Alexander Lobakin
>> <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:48:50 +0100
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 5:46 PM Alexander Lobakin
>>>> <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, these two are not tied closely to each other. The only
>>>>> requirements to GRO are to use it in the BH context and have some
>>>>> sane limits on the packet batches, e.g. NAPI has a limit of its
>>>>> budget (64/8/etc.).
>>>>> Move purely GRO fields into a new tagged group, &gro_node. Embed it
>>>>> into &napi_struct and adjust all the references. napi_id doesn't
>>>>> really belong to GRO, but:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. struct gro_node has a 4-byte padding at the end anyway. If you
>>>>>     leave napi_id outside, struct napi_struct takes additional 8 bytes
>>>>>     (u32 napi_id + another 4-byte padding).
>>>>> 2. gro_receive_skb() uses it to mark skbs. We don't want to split it
>>>>>     into two functions or add an `if`, as this would be less efficient,
>>>>>     but we need it to be NAPI-independent. The current approach doesn't
>>>>>     change anything for NAPI-backed GROs; for standalone ones (which
>>>>>     are less important currently), the embedded napi_id will be just
>>>>>     zero => no-op.
>>>>>
>>>>> Three Ethernet drivers use napi_gro_flush() not really meant to be
>>>>> exported, so move it to <net/gro.h> and add that include there.
>>>>> napi_gro_receive() is used in more than 100 drivers, keep it
>>>>> in <linux/netdevice.h>.
>>>>> This does not make GRO ready to use outside of the NAPI context
>>>>> yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
>>>>> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   include/linux/netdevice.h                  | 26 +++++---
>>>>>   include/net/busy_poll.h                    | 11 +++-
>>>>>   include/net/gro.h                          | 35 +++++++----
>>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c    |  1 +
>>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/cortina/gemini.c      |  1 +
>>>>>   drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c |  1 +
>>>>>   net/core/dev.c                             | 60 ++++++++-----------
>>>>>   net/core/gro.c                             | 69 +++++++++++-----------
>>>>>   8 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>> index 2a59034a5fa2..d29b6ebde73f 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>> @@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ struct gro_list {
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>>   /*
>>>>> - * size of gro hash buckets, must less than bit number of
>>>>> - * napi_struct::gro_bitmask
>>>>> + * size of gro hash buckets, must be <= the number of bits in
>>>>> + * gro_node::bitmask
>>>>>    */
>>>>>   #define GRO_HASH_BUCKETS       8
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -370,7 +370,6 @@ struct napi_struct {
>>>>>          unsigned long           state;
>>>>>          int                     weight;
>>>>>          u32                     defer_hard_irqs_count;
>>>>> -       unsigned long           gro_bitmask;
>>>>>          int                     (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int);
>>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
>>>>>          /* CPU actively polling if netpoll is configured */
>>>>> @@ -379,11 +378,14 @@ struct napi_struct {
>>>>>          /* CPU on which NAPI has been scheduled for processing */
>>>>>          int                     list_owner;
>>>>>          struct net_device       *dev;
>>>>> -       struct gro_list         gro_hash[GRO_HASH_BUCKETS];
>>>>>          struct sk_buff          *skb;
>>>>> -       struct list_head        rx_list; /* Pending GRO_NORMAL skbs */
>>>>> -       int                     rx_count; /* length of rx_list */
>>>>> -       unsigned int            napi_id; /* protected by netdev_lock */
>>>>> +       struct_group_tagged(gro_node, gro,
>>>>> +               unsigned long           bitmask;
>>>>> +               struct gro_list         hash[GRO_HASH_BUCKETS];
>>>>> +               struct list_head        rx_list; /* Pending GRO_NORMAL skbs */
>>>>> +               int                     rx_count; /* length of rx_list */
>>>>> +               u32                     napi_id; /* protected by netdev_lock */
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> I am old school, I would prefer a proper/standalone old C construct.
>>>>
>>>> struct gro_node  {
>>>>                  unsigned long           bitmask;
>>>>                 struct gro_list         hash[GRO_HASH_BUCKETS];
>>>>                 struct list_head        rx_list; /* Pending GRO_NORMAL skbs */
>>>>                 int                     rx_count; /* length of rx_list */
>>>>                 u32                     napi_id; /* protected by netdev_lock */
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> Really, what struct_group_tagged() can possibly bring here, other than
>>>> obfuscation ?
>>>
>>> You'd need to adjust every ->napi_id access, which is a lot.
>>> Plus, as I wrote previously, napi_id doesn't really belong here, but
>>> embedding it here eases life.
>>>
>>> I'm often an old school, too, but sometimes this helps a lot.
>>> Unless you have very strong preference on this.
>>>
>>
>> Is struct_group_tagged even supported by ctags ?
>>
>> In terms of maintenance, I am sorry to say this looks bad to me.

I get that it's not in good style to impose "new style" on the old folks
(esp. Founders, Maintainers). I agree that our drivers are just a random
sample in the pool of drivers, and it is not clearly a win-win to have 
us experiment there with "modern practices". But this particular
contribution from Olek is for benefit of all. It will be also a great
example how to use struct_group :)
I hope that we will get more struct_group usage, it's really great
mechanism to keep/pass only a part of the bigger struct (and zero/don't
care about the rest).

>>
>> Even without ctags, I find git grep -n "struct xxxx {" quite good.

I also use mostly grep to find stuff, including the ` {` "trick".
And I do add wrappers when it gets tedious, here is a one for tagged
structs:
function sgrep() {     # here is the pattern: vv
	grep -EInr "struct(_group_tagged[(]| )$*( [{]|,)" |
	awk '
		/{$/ { print; normal = 1; next }
		{ tagged[tag++] = $0 }
		END {
			if (!normal)
				for (t = 0; t < tag; t++)
					print tagged[t]
		}'; }

awk resolves the complexity of "struct something," being sometimes
a parameter of a macro

> 
> compile_commands.json (already supported natively by Kbuild) + clangd is
> not enough?
> 
> Elixir correctly tags struct_group()s.
> 
> napi->napi_id is used in a lot of core files and drivers, adjusting all
> the references is not what I wanted to do in the series which does
> completely different things.
> 
> Page Pool uses tagged struct groups, as well a ton of other different
> files. Do you want to revert all this and adjust a couple thousand
> references only due to ctags and grep?
> 
> (instead of just clicking on the references generated by clangd)
> 
> Thanks,
> Olek
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 16:36 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] bpf: cpumap: enable GRO for XDP_PASS frames Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] net: gro: decouple GRO from the NAPI layer Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 17:48   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-06  2:56     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-06 12:12     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-06 18:35       ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-07 11:56         ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-07 14:21           ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2025-02-07 14:55           ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-07 15:18             ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-07 15:28               ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-07 15:43                 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] net: gro: expose GRO init/cleanup to use outside of NAPI Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] bpf: cpumap: switch to GRO from netif_receive_skb_list() Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] bpf: cpumap: reuse skb array instead of a linked list to chain skbs Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] net: skbuff: introduce napi_skb_cache_get_bulk() Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] bpf: cpumap: switch to napi_skb_cache_get_bulk() Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] veth: use napi_skb_cache_get_bulk() instead of xdp_alloc_skb_bulk() Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-05 16:36 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] xdp: remove xdp_alloc_skb_bulk() Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-10 14:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] bpf: cpumap: enable GRO for XDP_PASS frames Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-10 15:31   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-10 15:31     ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-11  0:35       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-12 14:22         ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-12 15:55           ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-02-12 18:29             ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-14 15:43               ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eba70511-b6eb-4ff2-ae1a-183fa626d60a@intel.com \
    --to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=toke@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.