From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
kory.maincent@bootlin.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: ethtool: don't match a hwtstamp provider on a device without a PHC
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:07:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eced0ba7bd628bb48624d24d3b3cb956@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179025240177.2160803.17736204487729550368@kernel.org>
On 24.9.2026 14:20, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let
> patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your
> reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [High] The fix is incomplete.
> - [Medium] The patch deals with the 0xFFFFFFFF/-1 aliasing through an
> open-coded check at one comparison site instead of rejecting the
> value…
>
> --
> [...]
> [Severity: High]
> Can the same -1 == -1 match still happen in the PHY half of the lookup?
Unfortunately yes. In v3 I will reject the value in the netlink policy.
> [...]
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Would it be better to reject 0xFFFFFFFF at the netlink boundary instead
> of
> adding an open-coded check at one comparison site?
Will do in v3 (NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE).
> [...]
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260923121644.2194183-1-nb@tipi-net.de>
2026-09-23 12:16 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: ethtool: don't match a hwtstamp provider on a device without a PHC Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-23 13:00 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-24 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 9:07 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-09-23 12:16 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: ethtool: let tsconfig reach a PHY-only timestamp provider Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-24 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 9:15 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eced0ba7bd628bb48624d24d3b3cb956@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.