Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm: Make .remove and .shutdown HW shutdown consistent

[Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>]

On 7/24/22 22:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 22:51, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/24/22 20:47, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Hello Dmitry,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Now there is no point in having this as a separate function. Could you
>>>
>>> The only reason why I kept this was to avoid duplicating the same comment
>>> in two places. I thought that an inline function would be better than that.
>>>
>>>> please inline it?
>>>>
>>
>> Or do you mean inline it as dropping the wrapper helper and just call to
>> drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() in both callbacks ? I'm OK with that but as
>> mentioned then we should probably have to duplicate the comment.
>>
>> Since is marked as inline anyways, the resulting code should be the same.
> 
> Yes, I'd like for you to drop the wrapper. I'm fine with duplicating
> the comment, since it will be in place where it matters (before
> checking ddev->registered) rather than just stating the contract for
> the wrapper (which can be easily ignored).
> 
> (And yes, I do read patches and commit messages before commenting.)
> 

OK. I'll post a v3 tomorrow doing that then. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat