From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Subhransu S . Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:23:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119113640.166940-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 11/19/19 5:36 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check on p->sink looks bogus, I believe it should be p->source
> since the following code blocks are related to p->source. Fix
> this by replacing p->sink with p->source.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Copy-paste error")
> Fixes: 24c8d14192cc ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld: add DSP core controls")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> [ Note: this has not been tested ]
>
wow, nice catch. this dates from October 2014 and was merged in Linux 3.19.
I did look at the entire function and indeed it does not seem logical at
all and rather an unintentional bad copy-paste, probably undetected
since changing the gains on capture is less straightforward to test.
if (stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->playback_widget->name);
w = dai->playback_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_sink_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
continue;
[snip]
}
} else {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->capture_widget->name);
w = dai->capture_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
<< here it doesn't look right to use sink here.
continue;
This macro snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path() is also used in
the skylake/skl-topology.c but without any source/sink inversion.
I don't think anyone on the Intel side will have time to investigate
further, and unless someone from the initial contributors states this
was intentional (Vinod/Sanyog?), we should merge this.
let's see if there's any feedback and if not I'll ack this.
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> index baef461a99f1..f883c9340eee 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> @@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
> dai->capture_widget->name);
> w = dai->capture_widget;
> snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
> - if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
> + if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->source))
> continue;
>
> if (p->connect && p->source->power &&
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Subhransu S . Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:23:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119113640.166940-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 11/19/19 5:36 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check on p->sink looks bogus, I believe it should be p->source
> since the following code blocks are related to p->source. Fix
> this by replacing p->sink with p->source.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Copy-paste error")
> Fixes: 24c8d14192cc ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld: add DSP core controls")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> [ Note: this has not been tested ]
>
wow, nice catch. this dates from October 2014 and was merged in Linux 3.19.
I did look at the entire function and indeed it does not seem logical at
all and rather an unintentional bad copy-paste, probably undetected
since changing the gains on capture is less straightforward to test.
if (stream = SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->playback_widget->name);
w = dai->playback_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_sink_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
continue;
[snip]
}
} else {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->capture_widget->name);
w = dai->capture_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
<< here it doesn't look right to use sink here.
continue;
This macro snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path() is also used in
the skylake/skl-topology.c but without any source/sink inversion.
I don't think anyone on the Intel side will have time to investigate
further, and unless someone from the initial contributors states this
was intentional (Vinod/Sanyog?), we should merge this.
let's see if there's any feedback and if not I'll ack this.
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> index baef461a99f1..f883c9340eee 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> @@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
> dai->capture_widget->name);
> w = dai->capture_widget;
> snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
> - if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
> + if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->source))
> continue;
>
> if (p->connect && p->source->power &&
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Subhransu S . Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:23:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119113640.166940-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 11/19/19 5:36 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check on p->sink looks bogus, I believe it should be p->source
> since the following code blocks are related to p->source. Fix
> this by replacing p->sink with p->source.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Copy-paste error")
> Fixes: 24c8d14192cc ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld: add DSP core controls")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> [ Note: this has not been tested ]
>
wow, nice catch. this dates from October 2014 and was merged in Linux 3.19.
I did look at the entire function and indeed it does not seem logical at
all and rather an unintentional bad copy-paste, probably undetected
since changing the gains on capture is less straightforward to test.
if (stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->playback_widget->name);
w = dai->playback_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_sink_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
continue;
[snip]
}
} else {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->capture_widget->name);
w = dai->capture_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
<< here it doesn't look right to use sink here.
continue;
This macro snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path() is also used in
the skylake/skl-topology.c but without any source/sink inversion.
I don't think anyone on the Intel side will have time to investigate
further, and unless someone from the initial contributors states this
was intentional (Vinod/Sanyog?), we should merge this.
let's see if there's any feedback and if not I'll ack this.
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> index baef461a99f1..f883c9340eee 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> @@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
> dai->capture_widget->name);
> w = dai->capture_widget;
> snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
> - if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
> + if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->source))
> continue;
>
> if (p->connect && p->source->power &&
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 11:36 [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink Colin King
2019-11-19 11:36 ` Colin King
2019-11-19 14:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-11-19 14:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-19 14:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-02-25 13:24 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2020-02-25 13:24 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.