All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* trusted processes
@ 2005-05-13  0:19 Bedros Hanounik
  2005-05-13  2:13 ` David Masover
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bedros Hanounik @ 2005-05-13  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: reiserfs-list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]

last year, I asked a question on this list whether we could have file 
permissions for programs (or processes) in addition to users and groups. we 
need this feature to reject malicious code from accessing system files.

Microsoft has a tech paper about having what they call trusted processes. 
you can find it here 

http://msdn.microsoft.com/mobility/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnppcgen/html/wmsecurity.asp

I don't know for how long they've been working on this, but I bet I came up 
with this concept first.

what do you think guys of implementing such feature; should it be in the 
file system, kernel, or both. 

How hard is it to implement, besides the complexity of authentication 
management.

-B

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 898 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-13  4:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-13  0:19 trusted processes Bedros Hanounik
2005-05-13  2:13 ` David Masover
2005-05-13  4:05   ` Valdis.Kletnieks

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.