From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/xe: convert PCI barrier mmap to use xe_mmio_gem
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:21:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8ca23eb-193a-4c12-8d5b-be943fa820bc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908140939.CD9811F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On 08/09/2026 15:09, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] The migration of the PCI barrier mmap to use `xe_mmio_gem` removed the `VM_READ` restriction, allowing userspace to map and read from the doorbell register.
> --
>
> commit 545a53278606e03a94bbfc5ae72975b8ad8c6cae
> Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> drm/xe: convert PCI barrier mmap to use xe_mmio_gem
>
> This commit converts the PCI barrier mmap over to use xe_mmio_gem, simplifying
> the codebase and replacing the hard coded fake offset design. It introduces the
> first user of xe_mmio_gem for mapping the PCIe doorbell register.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> [ ... ]
>> -static int xe_pci_barrier_mmap(struct file *filp,
>> - struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> -{
> [ ... ]
>> - if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC))
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> - vm_flags_clear(vma, VM_MAYREAD | VM_MAYEXEC);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does removing this VM_READ restriction allow userspace to map the PCIe
> doorbell register with read permissions?
>
> The original xe_pci_barrier_mmap implementation explicitly restricted mappings
> to write-only by rejecting VM_READ and clearing VM_MAYREAD. By migrating to
> the generic xe_mmio_gem_mmap implementation in xe_mmio_gem.c, this read
> restriction is dropped, as the generic code only restricts VM_EXEC:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio_gem.c:xe_mmio_gem_mmap() {
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma_get_page_prot(vma));
> vm_flags_mod(vma, VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP |
> VM_NORESERVE, VM_MAYEXEC);
> }
>
> Reading from write-only PCIe doorbell registers can trigger an Unsupported
> Request or PCIe completion timeout, resulting in a Machine Check Exception
> and a full system hang. Because this mapping is accessible to unprivileged
> userspace, could this introduce a denial of service vulnerability?
I think you could anyway do that with write + fault and then do a read
to get past it. At least on x86 where there is no
write-only/read-disable bit in the PTE. So no way to actually prevent
it. Also, for upcoming usecase I want read support for mmio_gem, so
figured just drop this so I don't have to special case it later.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 13:49 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: forbid VMA split Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: use write-back mapping for dummy page Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: simplify fault handler loop Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: Revoke drm_vma_node on xe_mmio_gem destroy Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: cache the dummy page per object Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix destroy flow Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/xe/mmio_gem: reject VM_EXEC and drop VM_DONTCOPY Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 14:57 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-08 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/xe: convert PCI barrier mmap to use xe_mmio_gem Matthew Auld
2026-09-08 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 14:21 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-09-08 15:07 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-08 14:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mmio_gem: fix fault handler and destroy path (rev4) Patchwork
2026-09-08 15:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8ca23eb-193a-4c12-8d5b-be943fa820bc@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.