From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] mtd: physmap_of: Add multiple regions and concatenation support
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:46:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40904160646v75a98e02s446fd89c08cfebae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904161537.59048.sr@denx.de>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> > Reviewd-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>
>> Yup, still looks good to me. What boards has this been tested on?
>
> I tested this version on PPC405EX Kilauea equipped only one "standard"
> Spansion S29GL512 NOR chip. And a slightly modified version on an MPC8360
> board (kmeter1) which is equipped with the Intel P30 part mentioned in the
> bindings description. Slightly modified since this board support is not yet
> pushed upstream and currently using v2.6.28 (physmap_of.c has received minor
> modifications after 2.6.28 release).
Okay. It will be good to get this one into -next for some testing
exposure. Unless he asks me to do otherwise, I'll leave this one to
David to pick up.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] mtd: physmap_of: Add multiple regions and concatenation support
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:46:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40904160646v75a98e02s446fd89c08cfebae@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904161537.59048.sr@denx.de>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> > Reviewd-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>
>> Yup, still looks good to me. =A0What boards has this been tested on?
>
> I tested this version on PPC405EX Kilauea equipped only one "standard"
> Spansion S29GL512 NOR chip. And a slightly modified version on an MPC8360
> board (kmeter1) which is equipped with the Intel P30 part mentioned in th=
e
> bindings description. Slightly modified since this board support is not y=
et
> pushed upstream and currently using v2.6.28 (physmap_of.c has received mi=
nor
> modifications after 2.6.28 release).
Okay. It will be good to get this one into -next for some testing
exposure. Unless he asks me to do otherwise, I'll leave this one to
David to pick up.
g.
--=20
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 12:10 [PATCH 1/3 v3] mtd: physmap_of: Add multiple regions and concatenation support Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 12:10 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 12:10 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 13:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 13:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 13:37 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:37 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:46 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2009-04-16 13:46 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 13:49 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:49 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:49 ` Stefan Roese
2009-06-06 3:59 ` Stefan Roese
2009-06-06 3:59 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-16 13:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-04-16 13:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-04-16 14:05 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 14:05 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-16 18:38 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-16 18:38 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 8:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-04-17 8:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-04-17 8:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-06 7:25 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-06 7:25 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-06 7:25 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 12:45 ` Josh Boyer
2009-04-17 12:45 ` Josh Boyer
2009-04-17 12:45 ` Josh Boyer
2009-06-17 5:53 ` Grant Likely
2009-06-17 5:53 ` Grant Likely
2009-06-23 6:36 ` Stefan Roese
2009-06-23 6:36 ` Stefan Roese
2009-06-23 6:36 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40904160646v75a98e02s446fd89c08cfebae@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.