From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
Cc: <madhu.chittim@intel.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 22:12:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fba6fb6f-4d14-4e75-bbb3-2fae2862a7ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250826172845.265142-1-pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
On 8/26/25 19:28, Pavan Kumar Linga wrote:
> At present IDPF supports only 0x1452 and 0x145C as PF and VF device IDs
> on our current generation hardware. Future hardware exposes a new set of
> device IDs for each generation. To avoid adding a new device ID for each
> generation and to make the driver forward and backward compatible,
> make use of the IDPF PCI programming interface to load the driver.
>
> Write and read the VF_ARQBAL mailbox register to find if the current
> device is a PF or a VF.
>
> PCI SIG allocated a new programming interface for the IDPF compliant
> ethernet network controller devices. It can be found at:
> https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/20113
> with the document titled as 'PCI Code and ID Assignment Revision 1.16'
> or any latest revisions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c | 73 ++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c | 37 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> index 19a248d5b124..4b8e944994cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> @@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ void idpf_mbx_task(struct work_struct *work);
> void idpf_vc_event_task(struct work_struct *work);
> void idpf_dev_ops_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> void idpf_vf_dev_ops_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, u8 *is_vf);
please change it to *bool
> int idpf_intr_req(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> void idpf_intr_rel(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> u16 idpf_get_max_tx_hdr_size(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> index 8c46481d2e1f..b161715e1168 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> @@ -7,11 +7,57 @@
>
> #define DRV_SUMMARY "Intel(R) Infrastructure Data Path Function Linux Driver"
>
> +#define IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF 0x01
> +#define IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF \
> + (PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET << 8 | IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF)
> +
[...]
> @@ -304,6 +342,7 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> static const struct pci_device_id idpf_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, IDPF_DEV_ID_PF)},
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, IDPF_DEV_ID_VF)},
> + { PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF, 0xffffff)},
PCI_ANY or ~0 as last param would be closer to what others use,
in this form it looks like you avoid to be found when someone adds
a new helper for such usage
> { /* Sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, idpf_pci_tbl);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> index 4cc58c83688c..5bf9d3ccb624 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,43 @@
>
> #define IDPF_VF_ITR_IDX_SPACING 0x40
>
> +#define IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL 0xFEED0000
> +
> +/**
> + * idpf_is_vf_device - Helper to find if it is a VF device
> + * @pdev: PCI device information struct
> + * @is_vf: used to update VF device status
> + *
> + * Return: %0 on success, -%errno on failure.
> + */
> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, u8 *is_vf)
> +{
> + struct resource mbx_region;
> + resource_size_t mbx_start;
> + void __iomem *mbx_addr;
> + long len;
> +
> + resource_set_range(&mbx_region, VF_BASE, IDPF_VF_MBX_REGION_SZ);
> +
> + mbx_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, 0) + mbx_region.start;
> + len = resource_size(&mbx_region);
> +
> + mbx_addr = ioremap(mbx_start, len);
> + if (!mbx_addr)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + writel(IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL, mbx_addr + VF_ARQBAL - VF_BASE);
> +
> + /* Force memory write to complete before reading it back */
> + wmb();
> +
> + *is_vf = readl(mbx_addr + VF_ARQBAL - VF_BASE) == IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL;
> +
> + iounmap(mbx_addr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * idpf_vf_ctlq_reg_init - initialize default mailbox registers
> * @adapter: adapter structure
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
Cc: <madhu.chittim@intel.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 22:12:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fba6fb6f-4d14-4e75-bbb3-2fae2862a7ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250826172845.265142-1-pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
On 8/26/25 19:28, Pavan Kumar Linga wrote:
> At present IDPF supports only 0x1452 and 0x145C as PF and VF device IDs
> on our current generation hardware. Future hardware exposes a new set of
> device IDs for each generation. To avoid adding a new device ID for each
> generation and to make the driver forward and backward compatible,
> make use of the IDPF PCI programming interface to load the driver.
>
> Write and read the VF_ARQBAL mailbox register to find if the current
> device is a PF or a VF.
>
> PCI SIG allocated a new programming interface for the IDPF compliant
> ethernet network controller devices. It can be found at:
> https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/20113
> with the document titled as 'PCI Code and ID Assignment Revision 1.16'
> or any latest revisions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c | 73 ++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c | 37 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> index 19a248d5b124..4b8e944994cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h
> @@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ void idpf_mbx_task(struct work_struct *work);
> void idpf_vc_event_task(struct work_struct *work);
> void idpf_dev_ops_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> void idpf_vf_dev_ops_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, u8 *is_vf);
please change it to *bool
> int idpf_intr_req(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> void idpf_intr_rel(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> u16 idpf_get_max_tx_hdr_size(struct idpf_adapter *adapter);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> index 8c46481d2e1f..b161715e1168 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> @@ -7,11 +7,57 @@
>
> #define DRV_SUMMARY "Intel(R) Infrastructure Data Path Function Linux Driver"
>
> +#define IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF 0x01
> +#define IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF \
> + (PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET << 8 | IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF)
> +
[...]
> @@ -304,6 +342,7 @@ static int idpf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> static const struct pci_device_id idpf_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, IDPF_DEV_ID_PF)},
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, IDPF_DEV_ID_VF)},
> + { PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF, 0xffffff)},
PCI_ANY or ~0 as last param would be closer to what others use,
in this form it looks like you avoid to be found when someone adds
a new helper for such usage
> { /* Sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, idpf_pci_tbl);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> index 4cc58c83688c..5bf9d3ccb624 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_vf_dev.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,43 @@
>
> #define IDPF_VF_ITR_IDX_SPACING 0x40
>
> +#define IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL 0xFEED0000
> +
> +/**
> + * idpf_is_vf_device - Helper to find if it is a VF device
> + * @pdev: PCI device information struct
> + * @is_vf: used to update VF device status
> + *
> + * Return: %0 on success, -%errno on failure.
> + */
> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, u8 *is_vf)
> +{
> + struct resource mbx_region;
> + resource_size_t mbx_start;
> + void __iomem *mbx_addr;
> + long len;
> +
> + resource_set_range(&mbx_region, VF_BASE, IDPF_VF_MBX_REGION_SZ);
> +
> + mbx_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, 0) + mbx_region.start;
> + len = resource_size(&mbx_region);
> +
> + mbx_addr = ioremap(mbx_start, len);
> + if (!mbx_addr)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + writel(IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL, mbx_addr + VF_ARQBAL - VF_BASE);
> +
> + /* Force memory write to complete before reading it back */
> + wmb();
> +
> + *is_vf = readl(mbx_addr + VF_ARQBAL - VF_BASE) == IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL;
> +
> + iounmap(mbx_addr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * idpf_vf_ctlq_reg_init - initialize default mailbox registers
> * @adapter: adapter structure
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 17:28 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1] idpf: add support for IDPF PCI programming interface Pavan Kumar Linga
2025-08-26 17:28 ` Pavan Kumar Linga
2025-08-26 20:12 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2025-08-26 20:12 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-08-26 21:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linga, Pavan Kumar
2025-08-26 21:06 ` Linga, Pavan Kumar
2025-08-28 10:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-08-28 10:40 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-28 20:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Chittim, Madhu
2025-08-28 20:27 ` Chittim, Madhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fba6fb6f-4d14-4e75-bbb3-2fae2862a7ca@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=madhu.chittim@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.