From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Reset controller fixes for v4.14
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:46:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc2949d7-c038-1ac7-d93d-d2c645f5022d@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004011003.ae5r55dttjtxrvlj@localhost>
Hi Olof,
On 10/03/2017 06:10 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017@06:12:59PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Dear arm-soc-maintainers,
>>
>> please consider merging this tag for v4.14. It removes the "v1" suffix
>> from the newly merged HSDK reset driver, fixes its Kconfig dependencies,
>> and adds back the DT binding documentation that I accidentally dropped
>> onto the floor when applying the original patch.
>>
>> regards
>> Philipp
>>
>> The following changes since commit 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e:
>>
>> Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git tags/reset-fixes-for-4.14
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 544e3bf4f0e8278400f19ca7918a3cdf2548b4eb:
>>
>> reset: Restrict RESET_HSDK to ARC_SOC_HSDK or COMPILE_TEST (2017-09-21 12:44:01 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reset controller fixes for v4.14
>>
>> - Remove misleading HSDK v1 suffix, as there is no v2 planned
>> - Add missing DT binding documentation for HSDK reset driver
>> - Fix HSDK reset driver dependencies
>
> Merged, thanks.
What's the tentative plan for this hitting mainline since I have pending ARC HSDK
DT changes to use the new DT binding. If it is not goign to be 4.14-rc4, is it OK
for me to pull this branch into ARC tree as well and send to Linus' way before
armsoc pull request. Does it matter if Linux gets same changes via 2 tree !
P.S. Consider this no-ob question since I don't use merge commits in my typical
workflow !
-Vineet
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Reset controller fixes for v4.14
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:46:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc2949d7-c038-1ac7-d93d-d2c645f5022d@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004011003.ae5r55dttjtxrvlj@localhost>
Hi Olof,
On 10/03/2017 06:10 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Dear arm-soc-maintainers,
>>
>> please consider merging this tag for v4.14. It removes the "v1" suffix
>> from the newly merged HSDK reset driver, fixes its Kconfig dependencies,
>> and adds back the DT binding documentation that I accidentally dropped
>> onto the floor when applying the original patch.
>>
>> regards
>> Philipp
>>
>> The following changes since commit 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e:
>>
>> Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git tags/reset-fixes-for-4.14
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 544e3bf4f0e8278400f19ca7918a3cdf2548b4eb:
>>
>> reset: Restrict RESET_HSDK to ARC_SOC_HSDK or COMPILE_TEST (2017-09-21 12:44:01 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reset controller fixes for v4.14
>>
>> - Remove misleading HSDK v1 suffix, as there is no v2 planned
>> - Add missing DT binding documentation for HSDK reset driver
>> - Fix HSDK reset driver dependencies
>
> Merged, thanks.
What's the tentative plan for this hitting mainline since I have pending ARC HSDK
DT changes to use the new DT binding. If it is not goign to be 4.14-rc4, is it OK
for me to pull this branch into ARC tree as well and send to Linus' way before
armsoc pull request. Does it matter if Linux gets same changes via 2 tree !
P.S. Consider this no-ob question since I don't use merge commits in my typical
workflow !
-Vineet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 16:12 [GIT PULL] Reset controller fixes for v4.14 Philipp Zabel
2017-10-04 1:10 ` Olof Johansson
2017-10-04 18:46 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2017-10-04 18:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-10-05 0:36 ` Olof Johansson
2017-10-05 0:36 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc2949d7-c038-1ac7-d93d-d2c645f5022d@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.