* lockd loacked in D state
@ 2007-08-22 9:20 kenneth johansson
2007-09-11 9:25 ` kenneth johansson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kenneth johansson @ 2007-08-22 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Iam running linux 2.6.22.3 on an UP server and after some time lockd
stops to respond and I need to restart the server.
I turned on some debugging and got this almost directly. lockd is still
working at this point.
I have not tried to decode this printout myself yet. My plan was to wait
for the next lockup and do a sysrq-t to see where lockd was doing.
--------------------------
369.860671]
[ 369.860677] =======================================================
[ 369.860771] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 369.860819] 2.6.22.3 #7
[ 369.860861] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 369.860908] lockd/2432 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 369.860953] (&file->f_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock
+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.861125]
[ 369.861126] but task is already holding lock:
[ 369.861207] (nlm_host_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock
+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.861372]
[ 369.861373] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 369.861375]
[ 369.861494]
[ 369.861495] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 369.861579]
[ 369.861580] -> #1 (nlm_host_mutex){--..}:
[ 369.861748] [<c0135d4d>] __lock_acquire+0xdad/0xf60
[ 369.862028] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.862305] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.862583] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.862858] [<c023f561>] nlm_lookup_host+0x31/0x310
[ 369.863142] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.863419] [<c02414b5>] nlmsvc_lock+0x125/0x360
[ 369.863696] [<c024562c>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x7c/0x110
[ 369.863976] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.864257] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.864534] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.864813] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[ 369.865092]
[ 369.865093] -> #0 (&file->f_mutex){--..}:
[ 369.865261] [<c0135bc7>] __lock_acquire+0xc27/0xf60
[ 369.865538] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.865813] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.866090] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.866365] [<c02411c9>] nlmsvc_traverse_blocks+0x29/0xa0
[ 369.866644] [<c02425fe>] nlm_traverse_files+0x6e/0x210
[ 369.866920] [<c024282b>] nlmsvc_mark_resources+0x1b/0x30
[ 369.867197] [<c023f02e>] nlm_gc_hosts+0x4e/0x1e0
[ 369.867473] [<c023f576>] nlm_lookup_host+0x46/0x310
[ 369.867750] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.868027] [<c024506b>] nlm4svc_retrieve_args+0x3b/0xd0
[ 369.868304] [<c0245607>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x57/0x110
[ 369.868580] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.868856] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.869132] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.869408] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[ 369.869682]
[ 369.869683] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 369.869685]
[ 369.869806] 1 lock held by lockd/2432:
[ 369.869848] #0: (nlm_host_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock
+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.870050]
[ 369.870051] stack backtrace:
[ 369.870132] [<c0104eca>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[ 369.870207] [<c0105a02>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
[ 369.870282] [<c0105a75>] dump_stack+0x15/0x20
[ 369.870357] [<c0133d6c>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6c/0x80
[ 369.870433] [<c0135bc7>] __lock_acquire+0xc27/0xf60
[ 369.870508] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.870582] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.870658] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.870732] [<c02411c9>] nlmsvc_traverse_blocks+0x29/0xa0
[ 369.870808] [<c02425fe>] nlm_traverse_files+0x6e/0x210
[ 369.870883] [<c024282b>] nlmsvc_mark_resources+0x1b/0x30
[ 369.870959] [<c023f02e>] nlm_gc_hosts+0x4e/0x1e0
[ 369.871034] [<c023f576>] nlm_lookup_host+0x46/0x310
[ 369.871109] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.871185] [<c024506b>] nlm4svc_retrieve_args+0x3b/0xd0
[ 369.871261] [<c0245607>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x57/0x110
[ 369.871336] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.871411] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.871486] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.871561] =======================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: lockd loacked in D state
2007-08-22 9:20 lockd loacked in D state kenneth johansson
@ 2007-09-11 9:25 ` kenneth johansson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kenneth johansson @ 2007-09-11 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
It took a lot longer to happen now when I turned on some debugging but
eventually it got stuck in D state.
This is from the same run as the lock warning below.
[1728898.928667] =======================
[1728898.928711] lockd D 00000002 4840 2432 2 (L-TLB)
[1728898.928853] e8b91cec 00000046 00000000 00000002 e8b91cd4 c027d948 350fee32 00000046
[1728898.929134] 00000246 59054ceb 00061f12 00005fb5 e62eb38c eef79660 e62eb3b8 e8b91ce0
[1728898.929452] e62eb38c e62eb360 e62eb38c e62eb360 e62eb3b8 e8b91d24 c03365eb e62eb54c
[1728898.929771] Call Trace:
[1728898.929849] [<c03365eb>] lock_sock_nested+0x8b/0xf0
[1728898.929924] [<c0379d2d>] udp_destroy_sock+0xd/0x20
[1728898.929999] [<c0336d03>] sk_common_release+0x13/0xa0
[1728898.930075] [<c03791d8>] udp_lib_close+0x8/0x10
[1728898.930149] [<c03811e7>] inet_release+0x37/0x60
[1728898.930224] [<c033490b>] sock_release+0x1b/0x70
[1728898.930298] [<c039f09f>] xs_close+0x8f/0xc0
[1728898.930374] [<c039f10c>] xs_destroy+0x3c/0x90
[1728898.930449] [<c039d54c>] xprt_destroy+0x2c/0x50
[1728898.930524] [<c026cc8b>] kref_put+0x2b/0x90
[1728898.930600] [<c039d48d>] xprt_put+0xd/0x10
[1728898.930675] [<c039c3e3>] rpc_destroy_client+0x83/0xd0
[1728898.930750] [<c039c47a>] rpc_release_client+0x4a/0x70
[1728898.930825] [<c03a11ab>] rpc_put_task+0x4b/0x80
[1728898.930900] [<c039c204>] rpc_call_sync+0x74/0xa0
[1728898.930975] [<c0242d18>] nsm_mon_unmon+0xf8/0x130
[1728898.931051] [<c0242e2f>] nsm_monitor+0x3f/0xa0
[1728898.931125] [<c02450e3>] nlm4svc_retrieve_args+0xb3/0xd0
[1728898.931202] [<c0245607>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x57/0x110
[1728898.931278] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[1728898.931355] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[1728898.931434] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[1728898.931509] =======================
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:20:27 +0000, kenneth johansson wrote:
> Iam running linux 2.6.22.3 on an UP server and after some time lockd
> stops to respond and I need to restart the server.
>
> I turned on some debugging and got this almost directly. lockd is still
> working at this point.
>
> I have not tried to decode this printout myself yet. My plan was to wait
> for the next lockup and do a sysrq-t to see where lockd was doing.
>
> --------------------------
[ 369.860677] =======================================================
[ 369.860771] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 369.860819] 2.6.22.3 #7
[ 369.860861] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 369.860908] lockd/2432 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 369.860953] (&file->f_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.861125]
[ 369.861126] but task is already holding lock:
[ 369.861207] (nlm_host_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.861372]
[ 369.861373] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 369.861375]
[ 369.861494]
[ 369.861495] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 369.861579]
[ 369.861580] -> #1 (nlm_host_mutex){--..}:
[ 369.861748] [<c0135d4d>] __lock_acquire+0xdad/0xf60
[ 369.862028] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.862305] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.862583] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.862858] [<c023f561>] nlm_lookup_host+0x31/0x310
[ 369.863142] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.863419] [<c02414b5>] nlmsvc_lock+0x125/0x360
[ 369.863696] [<c024562c>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x7c/0x110
[ 369.863976] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.864257] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.864534] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.864813] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[ 369.865092]
[ 369.865093] -> #0 (&file->f_mutex){--..}:
[ 369.865261] [<c0135bc7>] __lock_acquire+0xc27/0xf60
[ 369.865538] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.865813] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.866090] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.866365] [<c02411c9>] nlmsvc_traverse_blocks+0x29/0xa0
[ 369.866644] [<c02425fe>] nlm_traverse_files+0x6e/0x210
[ 369.866920] [<c024282b>] nlmsvc_mark_resources+0x1b/0x30
[ 369.867197] [<c023f02e>] nlm_gc_hosts+0x4e/0x1e0
[ 369.867473] [<c023f576>] nlm_lookup_host+0x46/0x310
[ 369.867750] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.868027] [<c024506b>] nlm4svc_retrieve_args+0x3b/0xd0
[ 369.868304] [<c0245607>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x57/0x110
[ 369.868580] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.868856] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.869132] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.869408] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[ 369.869682]
[ 369.869683] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 369.869685]
[ 369.869806] 1 lock held by lockd/2432:
[ 369.869848] #0: (nlm_host_mutex){--..}, at: [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.870050]
[ 369.870051] stack backtrace:
[ 369.870132] [<c0104eca>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[ 369.870207] [<c0105a02>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
[ 369.870282] [<c0105a75>] dump_stack+0x15/0x20
[ 369.870357] [<c0133d6c>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6c/0x80
[ 369.870433] [<c0135bc7>] __lock_acquire+0xc27/0xf60
[ 369.870508] [<c0135f55>] lock_acquire+0x55/0x70
[ 369.870582] [<c03b6ff9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x290
[ 369.870658] [<c03b723c>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 369.870732] [<c02411c9>] nlmsvc_traverse_blocks+0x29/0xa0
[ 369.870808] [<c02425fe>] nlm_traverse_files+0x6e/0x210
[ 369.870883] [<c024282b>] nlmsvc_mark_resources+0x1b/0x30
[ 369.870959] [<c023f02e>] nlm_gc_hosts+0x4e/0x1e0
[ 369.871034] [<c023f576>] nlm_lookup_host+0x46/0x310
[ 369.871109] [<c023f874>] nlmsvc_lookup_host+0x34/0x40
[ 369.871185] [<c024506b>] nlm4svc_retrieve_args+0x3b/0xd0
[ 369.871261] [<c0245607>] nlm4svc_proc_lock+0x57/0x110
[ 369.871336] [<c03a4740>] svc_process+0x680/0x730
[ 369.871411] [<c0240166>] lockd+0x106/0x240
[ 369.871486] [<c0104b43>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
[ 369.871561] =======================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-11 9:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-22 9:20 lockd loacked in D state kenneth johansson
2007-09-11 9:25 ` kenneth johansson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.