From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable LTO in hyp
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 17:07:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc8359f03d939e6aaa9b81e4c29138ba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABCJKud2eSr8ZfPxwa3XVTaJvAfYgydsWUu-AKo2gtNStQshFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021-03-05 16:55, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:22 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 12:38, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:38:17 +0000,
>> > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:34 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:25:41 +0000,
>> > > > > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > > > > I assume hyp_panic() ends up being placed too far from __guest_enter()
>> > > > > > when the kernel is large enough. Possibly something to do with LLVM
>> > > > > > always splitting functions into separate sections with LTO. I'm not
>> > > > > > sure why the linker cannot shuffle things around to make everyone
>> > > > > > happy in this case, but I confirmed that this patch also fixes the
>> > > > > > build issue for me:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > index af8e940d0f03..128197b7c794 100644
>> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __hyp_call_panic(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par)
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__hyp_call_panic);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -void __noreturn hyp_panic(void)
>> > > > > > +void __noreturn hyp_panic(void) __section(".text")
>> > > > > > {
>> > > > > > u64 spsr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
>> > > > > > u64 elr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We're getting into black-magic territory here. Why wouldn't hyp_panic
>> > > > > be in the .text section already?
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not quite black magic. LLVM essentially flips on
>> > > > -ffunction-sections with LTO and therefore, hyp_panic() will be in
>> > > > .text.hyp_panic in vmlinux.o, while __guest_enter() will be in .text.
>> > > > Everything ends up in .text when we link vmlinux, of course.
>> > > >
>> > > > $ readelf --sections vmlinux.o | grep hyp_panic
>> > > > [3936] .text.hyp_panic PROGBITS 0000000000000000 004b56e4
>> > >
>> > > Note that disabling LTO here has essentially the same effect as using
>> > > __section(".text"). It stops the compiler from splitting these
>> > > functions into .text.* sections and makes it less likely that
>> > > hyp_panic() ends up too far away from __guest_enter().
>> > >
>> > > If neither of these workarounds sound appealing, I suppose we could
>> > > alternatively change hyp/entry.S to use adr_l for hyp_panic. Thoughts?
>> >
>> > That would be an actual fix instead of a workaround, as it would
>> > remove existing assumptions about the relative locations of the two
>> > objects. I guess you need to fix both instances with something such
>> > as:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > index b0afad7a99c6..a43e1f7ee354 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>> >
>> > // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
>> > get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
>> > - cbz x0, hyp_panic
>> > -
>> > + cbnz x0, 1f
>> > + adr_l x0, hyp_panic
>> > + br x0
>> > +1:
>>
>> Agree with replacing the conditional branches that refer to external
>> symbols: the compiler never emits those, for the reason we are seeing
>> here, i.e., the range is simply insufficient.
>>
>> But let's just use 'b hyp_panic' instead, no?
>
> Alright, this seems to work for me:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> index b0afad7a99c6..c62265951467 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>
> // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
> get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
> - cbz x0, hyp_panic
> + cbnz x0, 1f
> + b hyp_panic
>
> +1:
> // The hyp context is saved so make sure it is restored to
> allow
> // hyp_panic to run at hyp and, subsequently, panic to run in
> the host.
> // This makes use of __guest_exit to avoid duplication but sets
> the
> @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> // current state is saved to the guest context but it will only
> be
> // accurate if the guest had been completely restored.
> adr_this_cpu x0, kvm_hyp_ctxt, x1
> - adr x1, hyp_panic
> + adr_l x1, hyp_panic
> str x1, [x0, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(30)]
>
> get_vcpu_ptr x1, x0
>
> But when I say work, I mean this fixes the allmodconfig build with
> LTO, and my kernel boots at EL2. I don't actually have a way to
> properly test KVM on arm64. If nobody sees obvious issues here, I can
> send a proper patch a bit later.
Please do, it is "obviously correct"! ;-)
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable LTO in hyp
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 17:07:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc8359f03d939e6aaa9b81e4c29138ba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABCJKud2eSr8ZfPxwa3XVTaJvAfYgydsWUu-AKo2gtNStQshFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021-03-05 16:55, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:22 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 12:38, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:38:17 +0000,
>> > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:34 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:25:41 +0000,
>> > > > > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > > > > I assume hyp_panic() ends up being placed too far from __guest_enter()
>> > > > > > when the kernel is large enough. Possibly something to do with LLVM
>> > > > > > always splitting functions into separate sections with LTO. I'm not
>> > > > > > sure why the linker cannot shuffle things around to make everyone
>> > > > > > happy in this case, but I confirmed that this patch also fixes the
>> > > > > > build issue for me:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > index af8e940d0f03..128197b7c794 100644
>> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __hyp_call_panic(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par)
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__hyp_call_panic);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -void __noreturn hyp_panic(void)
>> > > > > > +void __noreturn hyp_panic(void) __section(".text")
>> > > > > > {
>> > > > > > u64 spsr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
>> > > > > > u64 elr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We're getting into black-magic territory here. Why wouldn't hyp_panic
>> > > > > be in the .text section already?
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not quite black magic. LLVM essentially flips on
>> > > > -ffunction-sections with LTO and therefore, hyp_panic() will be in
>> > > > .text.hyp_panic in vmlinux.o, while __guest_enter() will be in .text.
>> > > > Everything ends up in .text when we link vmlinux, of course.
>> > > >
>> > > > $ readelf --sections vmlinux.o | grep hyp_panic
>> > > > [3936] .text.hyp_panic PROGBITS 0000000000000000 004b56e4
>> > >
>> > > Note that disabling LTO here has essentially the same effect as using
>> > > __section(".text"). It stops the compiler from splitting these
>> > > functions into .text.* sections and makes it less likely that
>> > > hyp_panic() ends up too far away from __guest_enter().
>> > >
>> > > If neither of these workarounds sound appealing, I suppose we could
>> > > alternatively change hyp/entry.S to use adr_l for hyp_panic. Thoughts?
>> >
>> > That would be an actual fix instead of a workaround, as it would
>> > remove existing assumptions about the relative locations of the two
>> > objects. I guess you need to fix both instances with something such
>> > as:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > index b0afad7a99c6..a43e1f7ee354 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>> >
>> > // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
>> > get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
>> > - cbz x0, hyp_panic
>> > -
>> > + cbnz x0, 1f
>> > + adr_l x0, hyp_panic
>> > + br x0
>> > +1:
>>
>> Agree with replacing the conditional branches that refer to external
>> symbols: the compiler never emits those, for the reason we are seeing
>> here, i.e., the range is simply insufficient.
>>
>> But let's just use 'b hyp_panic' instead, no?
>
> Alright, this seems to work for me:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> index b0afad7a99c6..c62265951467 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>
> // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
> get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
> - cbz x0, hyp_panic
> + cbnz x0, 1f
> + b hyp_panic
>
> +1:
> // The hyp context is saved so make sure it is restored to
> allow
> // hyp_panic to run at hyp and, subsequently, panic to run in
> the host.
> // This makes use of __guest_exit to avoid duplication but sets
> the
> @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> // current state is saved to the guest context but it will only
> be
> // accurate if the guest had been completely restored.
> adr_this_cpu x0, kvm_hyp_ctxt, x1
> - adr x1, hyp_panic
> + adr_l x1, hyp_panic
> str x1, [x0, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(30)]
>
> get_vcpu_ptr x1, x0
>
> But when I say work, I mean this fixes the allmodconfig build with
> LTO, and my kernel boots at EL2. I don't actually have a way to
> properly test KVM on arm64. If nobody sees obvious issues here, I can
> send a proper patch a bit later.
Please do, it is "obviously correct"! ;-)
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable LTO in hyp
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 17:07:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc8359f03d939e6aaa9b81e4c29138ba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABCJKud2eSr8ZfPxwa3XVTaJvAfYgydsWUu-AKo2gtNStQshFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021-03-05 16:55, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:22 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 12:38, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:38:17 +0000,
>> > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:34 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:25:41 +0000,
>> > > > > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > > > > I assume hyp_panic() ends up being placed too far from __guest_enter()
>> > > > > > when the kernel is large enough. Possibly something to do with LLVM
>> > > > > > always splitting functions into separate sections with LTO. I'm not
>> > > > > > sure why the linker cannot shuffle things around to make everyone
>> > > > > > happy in this case, but I confirmed that this patch also fixes the
>> > > > > > build issue for me:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > index af8e940d0f03..128197b7c794 100644
>> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
>> > > > > > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __hyp_call_panic(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par)
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__hyp_call_panic);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -void __noreturn hyp_panic(void)
>> > > > > > +void __noreturn hyp_panic(void) __section(".text")
>> > > > > > {
>> > > > > > u64 spsr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
>> > > > > > u64 elr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We're getting into black-magic territory here. Why wouldn't hyp_panic
>> > > > > be in the .text section already?
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not quite black magic. LLVM essentially flips on
>> > > > -ffunction-sections with LTO and therefore, hyp_panic() will be in
>> > > > .text.hyp_panic in vmlinux.o, while __guest_enter() will be in .text.
>> > > > Everything ends up in .text when we link vmlinux, of course.
>> > > >
>> > > > $ readelf --sections vmlinux.o | grep hyp_panic
>> > > > [3936] .text.hyp_panic PROGBITS 0000000000000000 004b56e4
>> > >
>> > > Note that disabling LTO here has essentially the same effect as using
>> > > __section(".text"). It stops the compiler from splitting these
>> > > functions into .text.* sections and makes it less likely that
>> > > hyp_panic() ends up too far away from __guest_enter().
>> > >
>> > > If neither of these workarounds sound appealing, I suppose we could
>> > > alternatively change hyp/entry.S to use adr_l for hyp_panic. Thoughts?
>> >
>> > That would be an actual fix instead of a workaround, as it would
>> > remove existing assumptions about the relative locations of the two
>> > objects. I guess you need to fix both instances with something such
>> > as:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > index b0afad7a99c6..a43e1f7ee354 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
>> > @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>> >
>> > // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
>> > get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
>> > - cbz x0, hyp_panic
>> > -
>> > + cbnz x0, 1f
>> > + adr_l x0, hyp_panic
>> > + br x0
>> > +1:
>>
>> Agree with replacing the conditional branches that refer to external
>> symbols: the compiler never emits those, for the reason we are seeing
>> here, i.e., the range is simply insufficient.
>>
>> But let's just use 'b hyp_panic' instead, no?
>
> Alright, this seems to work for me:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> index b0afad7a99c6..c62265951467 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>
> // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
> get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
> - cbz x0, hyp_panic
> + cbnz x0, 1f
> + b hyp_panic
>
> +1:
> // The hyp context is saved so make sure it is restored to
> allow
> // hyp_panic to run at hyp and, subsequently, panic to run in
> the host.
> // This makes use of __guest_exit to avoid duplication but sets
> the
> @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> // current state is saved to the guest context but it will only
> be
> // accurate if the guest had been completely restored.
> adr_this_cpu x0, kvm_hyp_ctxt, x1
> - adr x1, hyp_panic
> + adr_l x1, hyp_panic
> str x1, [x0, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(30)]
>
> get_vcpu_ptr x1, x0
>
> But when I say work, I mean this fixes the allmodconfig build with
> LTO, and my kernel boots at EL2. I don't actually have a way to
> properly test KVM on arm64. If nobody sees obvious issues here, I can
> send a proper patch a bit later.
Please do, it is "obviously correct"! ;-)
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 18:45 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable LTO in hyp Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 18:45 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 18:45 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 19:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 19:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 19:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 21:25 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 21:25 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 21:25 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 22:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 22:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 22:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-04 22:34 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 22:34 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-04 22:34 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 2:38 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 2:38 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 2:38 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 11:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-05 11:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-05 11:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-05 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-05 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-05 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-05 16:55 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 16:55 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 16:55 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-03-05 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-03-05 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-05 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc8359f03d939e6aaa9b81e4c29138ba@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.