Re: [RESEND v2 1/6] dt-bindings: power: Add JH7110 AON PMU support

[Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>]

On 2023/5/4 17:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/05/2023 10:43, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/5/4 15:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2023 09:20, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Krzysztof,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am confused about what to do next. How to add this power-controller's
>>>>>> node in device tree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You just move power-domain-cells up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like this? 
>>>>
>>>> aon_syscon: syscon@17010000 {
>>>> 	compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon", "syscon", "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu";
>>>> 	reg = <0x0 0x17010000 0x0 0x1000>;
>>>> 	#power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> If right? I will tell the syscon patch's owner delete the "simple-mfd" in aon_syscon node.
>>>
>>> Yes, but your compatibles are now wrong. Just compatible =
>>> "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon", "syscon".
>>>
>>
>> If compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon", "syscon". My pmu drivers need use 
>> "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon" to match.
> 
> And how it would even work with your proposal
> "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon", "syscon", "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu"?
> 
> Try...
> 
>>  And my pmu series will add this 
>> aon_syscon in yaml and device tree, so the syscon patch's owner don't need 
>> to add the aon_syscon in its yaml and device tree?
> 
> I don't understand. But if you need to drop syscon, sure, drop it.
> 

Yes, I think it can drop aon_syscon node in syscon patch series. And maybe my
compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu", "syscon"; is better.

aon_syscon: syscon@17010000 {
	compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu", "syscon";
	reg = <0x0 0x17010000 0x0 0x1000>;
	#power-domain-cells = <1>;
};

Best regards,
Krzysztof



-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy