Re: what is a fixed bug?

[Rolf Leggewie <no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de>]

Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> it cannot change immediately to something else.
> 
> Otherwise, I'm all for the changes you propose 

Great.  Sorry I missed that drift.

I am certainly more than willing to try and understand the Angstrom
position and accomodate them where possible (I think that should have
been clear from my previous responses where I indicated the benefit I
see for A*).  Angstrom plays an important role for OE, no doubt about that.

> - if they will work.

I'd propose to try the process out.  I think you will even like it.
Maybe I was also misunderstood in that I think we need to have two bugs
for everything now, absolutely not.  My proposition is to just close
bugs when a fix has been pushed to .dev.  Angstrom should then keep a
watch on things and if necessary clone a bug that still needs fixing in
.stable (when for some reason the push cannot be done immediately).
Take look at bug 3838 which I created for illustration purposes of how I
think this should be done.

Regards

Rolf