kernel breackage, was Re: ipkg/opkg offical response

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Purdie schreef:
| On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 20:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
|> Richard Purdie schreef:
|>
|> | * Adding do_deploy to packaged-staging's knowledge. This is best done
|> | with the patch for kernel.bbclass that thesing was been working on.
I've
|> | made some suggestions for tweaks (looking at the version already in
|> | poky) and suggested he commits it after that.
|>
|> That patch broke uImage kernels *real bad*, I just pushed a fix for it.
|>
|> Proper review on mailinglist first next time?
|
| Well, it was posted for review on the mailing list and I was one of the
| few people who actually responded ;-).

You're being deliberatly obtuse.
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2008-March/004613.html
looks nothing like the patch that was committed, it doesn't have bugs
Jeremy and I fixed.
Or are you saying it's okay that people commit something different than
what was reviewed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFH7JhVMkyGM64RGpERAjcBAJ44PFUYtx86MAFoPwCQfJLGbUjxTACePy/y
KdT7FnpKR9ElE/JNayfIqww=
=JaFL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----