From: Anthony Foiani <tkil@scrye.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: "Robert P.J.Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: ppc/sata-fsl: orphan config value: CONFIG_MPC8315_DS
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:14:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gd35lbf55.fsf@dworkin.scrye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC5546A.4090506@freescale.com> (Scott Wood's message of "Tue, 29 May 2012 17:57:46 -0500")
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> writes:
> Board information is available from the device tree, and from
> platform code that was selected based on the device tree.
You're right, of course; I was focusing on discovery/probing, and
completely forgot about "provided information".
However, as I just mentioned in my reply to Yang, I'm pretty happy
with the kconfig solution (Adrian's patch, basically).
If we find that this is a more widespread problem, we can revisit this
discussion; but if only a handful of us have encountered this in a
5-year-old design, then I don't think it's worth the extra effort of
making it dynamic.
Maybe someone who knows devtree really well could crank that out in a
few minutes... but I'm not that person. :)
Regardless, thanks very much for helping out on this.
I do advocate that Adrian's patch get put into place, so that we don't
have undocumented / unconnected kconfig symbols in the tree. If we
ever do find out more details about the workaround, we can at least
add some comments at the code site.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 17:08 ppc/sata-fsl: orphan config value: CONFIG_MPC8315_DS Anthony Foiani
2012-05-21 6:31 ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-05-26 6:53 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-29 18:02 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-29 22:07 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-29 22:57 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-30 10:59 ` Li Yang
2012-05-30 20:07 ` Anthony Foiani
2012-05-30 20:14 ` Anthony Foiani [this message]
2012-05-30 20:20 ` Scott Wood
2012-05-30 20:52 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-04-30 6:41 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-04-30 18:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 0:34 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-01 0:42 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 2:06 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-01 18:05 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-01 23:35 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-02 0:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-30 21:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-05-02 6:37 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-05-08 12:04 ` Anthony Foiani
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-23 19:25 Scott Wood
2013-08-23 23:41 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-08-23 23:47 ` Scott Wood
2013-08-24 8:03 ` Anthony Foiani
2013-08-27 10:51 ` Xie Shaohui-B21989
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gd35lbf55.fsf@dworkin.scrye.com \
--to=tkil@scrye.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=r58472@freescale.com \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.