* autotools.bbclass question
@ 2009-01-03 19:44 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2009-01-03 22:53 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov @ 2009-01-03 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hi,
While trying to fix staging for net-snmp, I got a question regarding
autotools.bbclass. autotools_stage_all uses oe_runmake for installation
while autotools_stage_includes just issues make directly. Isn't it
a misfeature? Shouldn't both of them be changed to use the same approach?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: autotools.bbclass question
2009-01-03 19:44 autotools.bbclass question Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
@ 2009-01-03 22:53 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2009-01-03 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 19:44 +0000, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> While trying to fix staging for net-snmp, I got a question regarding
> autotools.bbclass. autotools_stage_all uses oe_runmake for installation
> while autotools_stage_includes just issues make directly. Isn't it
> a misfeature? Shouldn't both of them be changed to use the same approach?
Yes, both should probably use oe_runmake.
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Purdie
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-03 22:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-03 19:44 autotools.bbclass question Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2009-01-03 22:53 ` Richard Purdie
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.