All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Empty Target
@ 2009-02-06 22:05 Gilad Benjamini
  2009-02-07  2:15 ` Robert Nichols
  2009-02-07  7:12 ` Vincent Bernat
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gilad Benjamini @ 2009-02-06 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I am trying to troubleshoot an iptables rule set, trying to understand where
different packets are going. I have found that using "iptables -L -v" is a
useful tool, with the counters telling me what's going on.
To "trigger" counters I currently use LOG rules. I would actually prefer
some sort of empty rule; a rule that would do nothing beyond increasing the
counters.

Does something like that exist ?
Seems trivial to implement. 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Empty Target
  2009-02-06 22:05 Empty Target Gilad Benjamini
@ 2009-02-07  2:15 ` Robert Nichols
  2009-02-07  7:12 ` Vincent Bernat
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Nichols @ 2009-02-07  2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Gilad Benjamini wrote:
> I am trying to troubleshoot an iptables rule set, trying to understand where
> different packets are going. I have found that using "iptables -L -v" is a
> useful tool, with the counters telling me what's going on.
> To "trigger" counters I currently use LOG rules. I would actually prefer
> some sort of empty rule; a rule that would do nothing beyond increasing the
> counters.
> 
> Does something like that exist ?
> Seems trivial to implement. 

Extremely trivial, and already there.  There is no requirement that a rule
must have a target.  Just write the rule without one.  I have several such
rules in my ruleset.

-- 
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                 Do NOT delete it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Empty Target
  2009-02-06 22:05 Empty Target Gilad Benjamini
  2009-02-07  2:15 ` Robert Nichols
@ 2009-02-07  7:12 ` Vincent Bernat
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Bernat @ 2009-02-07  7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gilad Benjamini; +Cc: netfilter

OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert  d'encre ce jour du vendredi 06 février
2009, vers 23:05, "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@gmail.com> disait :

> I am trying to troubleshoot an iptables rule set, trying to understand where
> different packets are going. I have found that using "iptables -L -v" is a
> useful tool, with the counters telling me what's going on.
> To "trigger" counters I currently use LOG rules. I would actually prefer
> some sort of empty rule; a rule that would do nothing beyond increasing the
> counters.

> Does something like that exist ?
> Seems trivial to implement. 

You can also use the TRACE target if your kernel is recent enough.
-- 
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
-+- Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 7F17

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-07  7:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-06 22:05 Empty Target Gilad Benjamini
2009-02-07  2:15 ` Robert Nichols
2009-02-07  7:12 ` Vincent Bernat

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.