* kexec-tools-static question
@ 2009-04-23 11:37 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2009-04-23 11:48 ` Graeme Gregory
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov @ 2009-04-23 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hi,
I've stumbled upon kexec-tools/kexec-tools-static package. Currently it's packaged
inside generic feed (e.g. armv5te in my case). However it uses kernel headers
and klibc which are machine-specific IIRC. Shouldn't kexec-tools-static be built
with PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" instead?
As a side note: kexec-tools-static fails to build for tosa as the staged 2.6.29
kernel doesn't contain machine-specific headers (will look at it soon).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: kexec-tools-static question
2009-04-23 11:37 kexec-tools-static question Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
@ 2009-04-23 11:48 ` Graeme Gregory
2009-04-23 12:45 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Graeme Gregory @ 2009-04-23 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 04/23/2009 12:37 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've stumbled upon kexec-tools/kexec-tools-static package. Currently it's packaged
> inside generic feed (e.g. armv5te in my case). However it uses kernel headers
> and klibc which are machine-specific IIRC. Shouldn't kexec-tools-static be built
> with PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" instead?
>
> As a side note: kexec-tools-static fails to build for tosa as the staged 2.6.29
> kernel doesn't contain machine-specific headers (will look at it soon).
>
>
Look back in the mailing list archives, this is/has been/being discussed
already!
Graeme
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: kexec-tools-static question
2009-04-23 11:48 ` Graeme Gregory
@ 2009-04-23 12:45 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov @ 2009-04-23 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On 04/23/2009 12:37 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've stumbled upon kexec-tools/kexec-tools-static package. Currently
>> it's packaged inside generic feed (e.g. armv5te in my case). However it
>> uses kernel headers and klibc which are machine-specific IIRC.
>> Shouldn't kexec-tools-static be built with PACKAGE_ARCH =
>> "${MACHINE_ARCH}" instead?
>>
>> As a side note: kexec-tools-static fails to build for tosa as the
>> staged 2.6.29 kernel doesn't contain machine-specific headers (will
>> look at it soon).
>>
>>
> Look back in the mailing list archives, this is/has been/being discussed
> already!
Hmm. That was discussed in the first days of April and we are now facing May.
In that thread you said that your patches are not finished. Did you have time
to finish them so that they can be commited?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-23 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-23 11:37 kexec-tools-static question Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2009-04-23 11:48 ` Graeme Gregory
2009-04-23 12:45 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.