* TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ??
@ 2009-04-27 19:40 Leon Woestenberg
2009-04-27 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-27 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Woestenberg @ 2009-04-27 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel, Denis 'Gnutoo' Carikli
Hello,
I just came across this fix:
http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi?url=openembedded/commit/&id=413cc98aa563c9e6104d1104d5b24987ab9d12f8
which does:
+TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
to fix LDFLAGS QA(GNU-hash).
but doesn't this approach abuse TARGET_CC_ARCH?
Regards,
--
Leon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ??
2009-04-27 19:40 TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ?? Leon Woestenberg
@ 2009-04-27 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-27 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2009-04-27 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:40:53PM +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just came across this fix:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi?url=openembedded/commit/&id=413cc98aa563c9e6104d1104d5b24987ab9d12f8
>
> which does:
>
> +TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
>
> to fix LDFLAGS QA(GNU-hash).
>
> but doesn't this approach abuse TARGET_CC_ARCH?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/22670/focus=22703
--
Denys
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ??
2009-04-27 19:40 TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ?? Leon Woestenberg
2009-04-27 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
@ 2009-04-27 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2009-04-27 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 27-04-09 21:40, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just came across this fix:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi?url=openembedded/commit/&id=413cc98aa563c9e6104d1104d5b24987ab9d12f8
>
> which does:
>
> +TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
>
> to fix LDFLAGS QA(GNU-hash).
>
> but doesn't this approach abuse TARGET_CC_ARCH?
It is, but the alternative is to patch each and every
(c)makefile/sconscript/bjam for the project, which is very time
consuming. If you have the time, patch the buildsystem, but realize that
you will need to maintain those patches for every release if you don't
get them upstream.
regards,
Koen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-27 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-27 19:40 TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" ?? Leon Woestenberg
2009-04-27 19:52 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-27 21:19 ` Koen Kooi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.