* [PATCH 1/4] site/x86_64-linux: Add some vars from ix86-common @ 2009-08-13 15:00 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel ix86-common had a few updates in the past couple of years; bring them to x86_64. Some of these could probably be moved to common-glibc. Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> --- site/x86_64-linux | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/x86_64-linux b/site/x86_64-linux index 3c47a56..83d1511 100644 --- a/site/x86_64-linux +++ b/site/x86_64-linux @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ db_cv_path_strip=${db_cv_path_strip=/usr/bin/strip} db_cv_posixmutexes=${db_cv_posixmutexes=no} db_cv_sprintf_count=${db_cv_sprintf_count=yes} db_cv_uimutexes=${db_cv_uimutexes=no} + +# glib glib_cv_hasinline=${glib_cv_hasinline=yes} glib_cv_has__inline=${glib_cv_has__inline=yes} glib_cv_has__inline__=${glib_cv_has__inline__=yes} @@ -61,6 +63,8 @@ glib_cv_uscore=${glib_cv_uscore=no} glib_cv___va_copy=${glib_cv___va_copy=yes} glib_cv_va_copy=${glib_cv_va_copy=yes} glib_cv_va_val_copy=${glib_cv_va_val_copy=no} +ac_cv_func_posix_getgrgid_r=${ac_cv_func_posix_getgrgid_r=yes} + lftp_cv_va_copy=${lftp_cv_va_copy=yes} nano_cv_func_regexec_segv_emptystr=${nano_cv_func_regexec_segv_emptystr=no} samba_cv_HAVE_VA_COPY=${samba_cv_HAVE_VA_COPY=yes} @@ -80,3 +84,12 @@ am_cv_func_working_getline=${am_cv_func_working_getline=yes} #gcc ac_cv_lib_m_sin=${ac_cv_lib_m_sin=yes} + +# eds-dbus +ac_cv_libiconv_utf8=${ac_cv_libiconv_utf8=yes} + +#dbus +ac_cv_have_abstract_sockets=${ac_cv_have_abstract_sockets=yes} + +# p3scan / quagga +ac_cv_func_realloc_0_nonnull=${ac_cv_func_realloc_0_nonnull=yes} -- 1.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:00 [PATCH 1/4] site/x86_64-linux: Add some vars from ix86-common Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 ` Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel do_install was looking under ${D}/some long cross path/*/lib; needs to be lib64 on x86_64. On x86_64 base_libdir would be set to /lib64, so we can go by that. Bump INC_PR for recent gccs (4.3.3, 4.4.1). Hopefully no one is using older gcc for x86_64. Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> --- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc | 2 +- recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc | 2 +- recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc | 13 ++++++++----- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc index 5802492..4a3cb49 100644 --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv3" DEPENDS = "mpfr gmp" -INC_PR = "r5" +INC_PR = "r6" SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://fedora/gcc43-c++-builtin-redecl.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc index a5b9d91..2759ab9 100644 --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv3" DEPENDS = "mpfr gmp" -INC_PR = "r1" +INC_PR = "r2" FILESPATHPKG .= ":gcc-$PV" diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc index fa1f47f..6c4f9bb 100644 --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ do_install () { elif [ -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libgcc_s.so.? ]; then mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} else - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} || true + # Look for .../${TARGET_SYS}/lib/libgcc_s* + # (or /lib64/, on x86_64) + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} || true fi @@ -45,10 +47,11 @@ do_install () { mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true else - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libstdc++.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libg2c.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libgfortran*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true + # Look for .../${TARGET_SYS}/lib/lib* (or /lib64/ on x86_64) + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libstdc++.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libg2c.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libgfortran*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true fi -- 1.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 ` Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] openssl.inc: fix packaging on x86_64; use INC_PR Michael Smith 2009-09-01 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc " Khem Raj 2009-08-14 0:46 ` Douglas Royds 2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel udev installs binaries under $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev, even if ${libdir} is ${prefix}/lib64. This means some paths need to be hardcoded to "/lib" instead of "${base_libdir}". Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> --- recipes/udev/udev_141.bb | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb b/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb index 3f42564..13b3808 100644 --- a/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb +++ b/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPL" # Untested DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" -PR = "r11" +PR = "r12" # needed for init.d script RDEPENDS_${PN} += "udev-utils" @@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ RPROVIDES_${PN} = "hotplug" FILES_${PN} += "${usrbindir}/* ${usrsbindir}/udevd" FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${usrbindir}/.debug ${usrsbindir}/.debug" -FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/udev/* ${base_libdir}/udev/*" -FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${base_libdir}/udev/.debug" +# udev installs binaries under $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev, even if ${libdir} +# is ${prefix}/lib64 +FILES_${PN} += "/lib/udev/* /lib/udev/*" +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "/lib/udev/.debug" do_install () { install -d ${D}${usrsbindir} \ @@ -64,8 +66,11 @@ do_install () { install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/default ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/udev - mv ${D}${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/ - ln -sf ${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}${base_libdir}/udev/ + # Move udev rules from $(udev_prefix)/lib to /etc. + # This is hardcoded to $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev/rules.d in the + # Makefile, even if libdir is lib64. + mv ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/ + ln -sf ${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}/lib/udev/ cp ${S}/rules/rules.d/* ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/ cp ${S}/rules/packages/* ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/ -- 1.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] openssl.inc: fix packaging on x86_64; use INC_PR 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 ` Michael Smith 2009-09-01 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel openssl's makefile always installs to ${prefix}/lib, even if libdir is ${prefix}/lib64. Move some files around to make it fit. Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> --- recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7g.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7m.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8g.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl.inc | 13 +++++++++++-- recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7e.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7g.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7m.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g.bb | 2 +- recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8j.bb | 2 +- 10 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7g.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7g.bb index dfe3ab5..40558f2 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7g.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7g.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig native require openssl.inc -PR = "r2" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://armeb.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7m.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7m.bb index 445b6e9..ccae43e 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7m.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.7m.bb @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ require openssl.inc export FULL_OPTIMIZATION = " " export BUILD_OPTIMIZATION = " " -PR = "r2" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://armeb.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8g.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8g.bb index 27f0169..d567ae7 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8g.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8g.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig native require openssl.inc -PR = "r1" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" # This flag can contain target options (e.g -mfpu=neon for armv7-a systems) export FULL_OPTIMIZATION = " " diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb index ffbd5ea..976a4d7 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl-native_0.9.8j.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig native require openssl.inc -PR = "r1" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" # This flag can contain target options (e.g -mfpu=neon for armv7-a systems) export FULL_OPTIMIZATION = " " diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl.inc b/recipes/openssl/openssl.inc index e6e345b..fd0756b 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl.inc +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl.inc @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ SECTION = "libs/network" SRC_URI = "http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-${PV}.tar.gz" S = "${WORKDIR}/openssl-${PV}" +INC_PR = "r10" + AR_append = " r" CFLAG = "${@base_conditional('SITEINFO_ENDIANESS', 'le', '-DL_ENDIAN', '-DB_ENDIAN', d)} \ -DTERMIO ${FULL_OPTIMIZATION} -Wall" @@ -91,9 +93,16 @@ do_stage () { } do_install () { - install -m 0755 -d ${D}${libdir}/pkgconfig oe_runmake INSTALL_PREFIX="${D}" install - chmod 644 ${D}${libdir}/pkgconfig/openssl.pc + + # On x86_64, move lib/* to lib64 + if [ "${libdir}" != "${prefix}/lib" ] + then + install -d ${D}${libdir} ${D}${libdir}/pkgconfig + mv ${D}${prefix}/lib/lib* ${D}${libdir} + mv ${D}${prefix}/lib/pkgconfig/*.pc ${D}${libdir}/pkgconfig + fi + oe_libinstall -so libcrypto ${D}${libdir} oe_libinstall -so libssl ${D}${libdir} } diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7e.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7e.bb index cda364a..b821076 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7e.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7e.bb @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ require openssl.inc -PR = "r6" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://armeb.patch;patch=1 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7g.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7g.bb index fbd2af2..68a2614 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7g.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7g.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig require openssl.inc -PR = "r7" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://armeb.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7m.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7m.bb index fbd2af2..68a2614 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7m.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.7m.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig require openssl.inc -PR = "r7" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://armeb.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g.bb index 1cb360f..d76e756 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8g.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig require openssl.inc -PR = "r9" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" SRC_URI += "file://debian.patch;patch=1 \ file://configure-targets.patch;patch=1 \ diff --git a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8j.bb b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8j.bb index 21450d2..bb9694f 100644 --- a/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8j.bb +++ b/recipes/openssl/openssl_0.9.8j.bb @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ inherit pkgconfig require openssl.inc -PR = "r2" +PR = "${INC_PR}.0" export OE_LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}" -- 1.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] openssl.inc: fix packaging on x86_64; use INC_PR Michael Smith @ 2009-09-01 22:00 ` Michael Smith 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-09-01 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel Hi, Could someone with prefix = /usr give this a quick build test before I check it in? http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/940/ Thanks, Mike Michael Smith wrote: > udev installs binaries under $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev, even if ${libdir} > is ${prefix}/lib64. This means some paths need to be hardcoded to "/lib" > instead of "${base_libdir}". > > Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> > --- > recipes/udev/udev_141.bb | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb b/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb > index 3f42564..13b3808 100644 > --- a/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb > +++ b/recipes/udev/udev_141.bb > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPL" > # Untested > DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" > > -PR = "r11" > +PR = "r12" > > # needed for init.d script > RDEPENDS_${PN} += "udev-utils" > @@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ RPROVIDES_${PN} = "hotplug" > FILES_${PN} += "${usrbindir}/* ${usrsbindir}/udevd" > FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${usrbindir}/.debug ${usrsbindir}/.debug" > > -FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/udev/* ${base_libdir}/udev/*" > -FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${base_libdir}/udev/.debug" > +# udev installs binaries under $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev, even if ${libdir} > +# is ${prefix}/lib64 > +FILES_${PN} += "/lib/udev/* /lib/udev/*" > +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "/lib/udev/.debug" > > do_install () { > install -d ${D}${usrsbindir} \ > @@ -64,8 +66,11 @@ do_install () { > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default > install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/default ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/udev > > - mv ${D}${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/ > - ln -sf ${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}${base_libdir}/udev/ > + # Move udev rules from $(udev_prefix)/lib to /etc. > + # This is hardcoded to $(udev_prefix)/lib/udev/rules.d in the > + # Makefile, even if libdir is lib64. > + mv ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/ > + ln -sf ${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d ${D}/lib/udev/ > > cp ${S}/rules/rules.d/* ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/ > cp ${S}/rules/packages/* ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith @ 2009-08-13 15:43 ` Khem Raj 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Michael Smith 2009-08-14 0:46 ` Douglas Royds 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2009-08-13 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel On (13/08/09 11:00), Michael Smith wrote: > do_install was looking under ${D}/some long cross path/*/lib; > needs to be lib64 on x86_64. On x86_64 base_libdir would be set to > /lib64, so we can go by that. this one looks ok. you need to install same for 4.3.4 atleast. > > Bump INC_PR for recent gccs (4.3.3, 4.4.1). Hopefully no one is using > older gcc for x86_64. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com> > --- > recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc | 2 +- > recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc | 2 +- > recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc | 13 ++++++++----- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc > index 5802492..4a3cb49 100644 > --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc > +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.3.3.inc > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv3" > > DEPENDS = "mpfr gmp" > > -INC_PR = "r5" > +INC_PR = "r6" > > SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://fedora/gcc43-c++-builtin-redecl.patch;patch=1;pnum=0 \ > diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc > index a5b9d91..2759ab9 100644 > --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc > +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.4.1.inc > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv3" > > DEPENDS = "mpfr gmp" > > -INC_PR = "r1" > +INC_PR = "r2" > > FILESPATHPKG .= ":gcc-$PV" > > diff --git a/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc b/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc > index fa1f47f..6c4f9bb 100644 > --- a/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc > +++ b/recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc > @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ do_install () { > elif [ -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libgcc_s.so.? ]; then > mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} > else > - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} || true > + # Look for .../${TARGET_SYS}/lib/libgcc_s* > + # (or /lib64/, on x86_64) > + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libgcc_s.so* ${D}${target_base_libdir} || true > fi > > > @@ -45,10 +47,11 @@ do_install () { > mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/nof/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > > else > - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libstdc++.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libg2c.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libgfortran*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > - mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/lib/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > + # Look for .../${TARGET_SYS}/lib/lib* (or /lib64/ on x86_64) > + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libstdc++.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libg2c.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libgfortran*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > + mv -f ${D}${prefix}/*/${target_base_libdir}/libssp*.so* ${D}${target_libdir} || true > fi > > > -- > 1.6.3 > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc " Khem Raj @ 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Michael Smith 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-14 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel Khem Raj wrote: > On (13/08/09 11:00), Michael Smith wrote: >> Bump INC_PR for recent gccs (4.3.3, 4.4.1). Hopefully no one is using >> older gcc for x86_64. > this one looks ok. you need to install same for 4.3.4 atleast. OK, I'll bump PR for 4.1.2, 4.2.[34], 4.3.[34], 4.4.1 in the next patch ver. Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc " Khem Raj @ 2009-08-14 0:46 ` Douglas Royds 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Rolf Leggewie 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Douglas Royds @ 2009-08-14 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel FWIW, Ubuntu Hardy LTS 8.04 is on GCC 4.2.3: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=gcc Hardy LTS is the "Long-Term Support" version of Ubuntu, that they support for 2 years. It will be replaced in April 2010, which isn't tooooo far away. Douglas. Michael Smith wrote: > do_install was looking under ${D}/some long cross path/*/lib; > needs to be lib64 on x86_64. On x86_64 base_libdir would be set to > /lib64, so we can go by that. > > Bump INC_PR for recent gccs (4.3.3, 4.4.1). Hopefully no one is using > older gcc for x86_64. > ======================================================================= This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this transmission. If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no other act on the email. Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or corrupted during transmission. ======================================================================= ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-14 0:46 ` Douglas Royds @ 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Rolf Leggewie 2009-08-14 14:15 ` Michael Smith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Rolf Leggewie @ 2009-08-14 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel Douglas Royds wrote: > FWIW, Ubuntu Hardy LTS 8.04 is on GCC 4.2.3: > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=gcc > > Hardy LTS is the "Long-Term Support" version of Ubuntu, that they > support for 2 years. It will be replaced in April 2010, which isn't > tooooo far away. Hardy is my main build machine. I hope OE will continue to work with it. Hardy will be EOL'd on the desktop in April 2011. Support for the console/server version will run another two years after that. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Rolf Leggewie @ 2009-08-14 14:15 ` Michael Smith 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Michael Smith @ 2009-08-14 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel > From: Rolf Leggewie <no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de> > Hardy is my main build machine. I hope OE will continue to work with it. Yes, I bumped a limited set of INC_PRs because the change affected only builds for x86_64 targets, and I think that usage is quite rare and probably limited to newer GCCs. I just didn't want to force everybody to rebuild when the vast majority are not building for 64. It should in no way affect compatibility with other GCCs, other than that if someone is already using one to build for x86_64, their libgcc pkg will stay broken tilll they force a rebuild :) Mike ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-01 22:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-08-13 15:00 [PATCH 1/4] site/x86_64-linux: Add some vars from ix86-common Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix " Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] openssl.inc: fix packaging on x86_64; use INC_PR Michael Smith 2009-09-01 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] udev 141: fix packaging on x86_64 Michael Smith 2009-08-13 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] gcc: fix libstdc/libgcc " Khem Raj 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Michael Smith 2009-08-14 0:46 ` Douglas Royds 2009-08-14 13:06 ` Rolf Leggewie 2009-08-14 14:15 ` Michael Smith
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.