* [lm-sensors] libsensors - can subfeature number be negative?
@ 2009-11-13 17:39 Ian Pilcher
2009-11-13 19:40 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pilcher @ 2009-11-13 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Am I safe in assuming that subfeature numbers are never negative?
Thanks!
--
====================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com
====================================
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] libsensors - can subfeature number be negative?
2009-11-13 17:39 [lm-sensors] libsensors - can subfeature number be negative? Ian Pilcher
@ 2009-11-13 19:40 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2009-11-13 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:39:57 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Am I safe in assuming that subfeature numbers are never negative?
Yes you are. The lowest subfeature number is
SENSORS_SUBFEATURE_IN_INPUT, value 0.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-13 19:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-13 17:39 [lm-sensors] libsensors - can subfeature number be negative? Ian Pilcher
2009-11-13 19:40 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.